Abstract. The Aerodyne Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) was recently developed to provide long-term real-time continuous measurements of ambient non-refractory (i.e., organic, sulfate, ammonium, nitrate, and chloride) submicron particulate matter (NR-PM1). Currently, there are a limited number of field studies that evaluate the long-term performance of the ACSM against established monitoring networks. In this study, we present seasonal intercomparisons of the ACSM with collocated fine aerosol (PM2.5) measurements at the Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH) Jefferson Street (JST) site near downtown Atlanta, GA, during 2011–2012. The collocated measurements included a second ACSM, continuous and integrated sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium measurements, as well as a semi-continuous Sunset organic carbon/elemental carbon (OC/EC) analyzer, continuous tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM), 24 h integrated Federal Reference Method (FRM) filters, and continuous scanning electrical mobility system-mixing condensation particle counter (SEMS-MCPC). Intercomparison of the two collocated ACSMs resulted in strong correlations (r2 > 0.8) for all chemical species, except chloride (r2 = 0.21); mass concentration for all chemical species agreed within ±27%, indicating that ACSM instruments are capable of stable and reproducible operation. Chemical constituents measured by the ACSM are also compared with those obtained from the continuous measurements from JST. Since the continuous measurement concentrations are adjusted to match the integrated filter measurements, these comparisons reflect the combined uncertainties of the ACSM, continuous, and filter measurements. In general, speciated ACSM mass concentrations correlate well (r2 > 0.7) with the continuous measurements from JST, although the correlation for nitrate is weaker (r2 = 0.55) in summer. Differences between ACSM mass concentrations and the filter-adjusted JST continuous data are 5–27%, 4–25%, and 34–51% for sulfate, ammonium, and nitrate, respectively. These comparisons are all close to the stated ±30% accuracy of the ACSM except for nitrate. These discrepancies could be due to positive biases in the ACSM nitrate concentrations from interferences at the NO+ (m/z 30) fragment ion and/or negative artifacts in the nitrate filter measurement (from volatilization of NH4NO3) are also possible. The organic matter OM/OC ratios derived from linear regression of ACSM OM vs. Sunset OC/EC analyzer are 4.18 ± 0.04 and 3.59 ± 0.02 for summer and fall, respectively. Linear correlations of the ACSM NR-PM1 plus EC with TEOM PM2.5 mass are strong (r2 > 0.7) with percentage difference of 19% and 80% during summer and fall, respectively. On the other hand, the ACSM NR-PM1 correlation with FRM PM1 is high (r2 > 0.8) with percentage difference of ±47% over three seasons. Correlation of ACSM NR-PM1 plus EC mass with SEMS-MCPC PM1 volume concentration results in an estimation of aerosol density of 1.61 g cm−3 for fall 2012 period. ACSM organic concentrations measured during this study were obtained using relative ionization efficiency (RIE) values observed in Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS). Explicit calibration of the ACSM relative ionizations for ammonium, nitrate, and sulfate, during this study was shown to improve the comparisons between ACSM and collocated measurements for these species. The accuracy of the organic and total mass concentrations would likely also be improved if organic relative ionization efficiency values for the ACSM were available during this study. Laboratory calibrations of ACSM relative ionization efficiencies using organic particles of known composition are recommended for future studies.