The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

No abstract

Actin is one of the most abundant and versatile proteins in eukaryotic cells. As discussed in many contributions to this Special Issue, its transition from a monomeric G-actin to a filamentous F-actin form plays a critical role in a variety of cellular processes, including control of cell shape and cell motility. Once polymerized from G-actin, F-actin forms the central core of muscle-thin filaments and acts as molecular tracks for myosin-based motor activity. The ATP-dependent cross-bridge cycle of myosin attachment and detachment drives the sliding of myosin thick filaments past thin filaments in muscle and the translocation of cargo in somatic cells. The variation in actin function is dependent on the variation in muscle and non-muscle myosin isoform behavior as well as interactions with a plethora of additional actin-binding proteins. Extensive work has been devoted to defining the kinetics of actin-based force generation powered by the ATPase activity of myosin. In addition, over the past decade, cryo-electron microscopy has revealed the atomic-evel details of the binding of myosin isoforms on the F-actin surface. Most accounts of the structural interactions between myosin and actin are described from the perspective of the myosin molecule. Here, we discuss myosin-binding to actin as viewed from the actin surface. We then describe conserved structural features of actin required for the binding of all or most myosin isoforms while also noting specific interactions unique to myosin isoforms.

No abstract

Following binding to the thin filament, β-cardiac myosin couples ATP-hydrolysis to conformational rearrangements in the myosin motor that drive myofilament sliding and cardiac ventricular contraction. However, key features of the cardiac-specific actin-myosin interaction remain uncertain, including the structural effect of ADP release from myosin, which is rate-limiting during force generation. In fact, ADP release slows under experimental load or in the intact heart due to the afterload, thereby adjusting cardiac muscle power output to meet physiological demands. To further elucidate the structural basis of this fundamental process, we used a combination of cryo-EM reconstruction methodologies to determine structures of the human cardiac actin–myosin–tropomyosin filament complex at better than 3.4 Å-resolution in the presence and in the absence of Mg2+·ADP. Focused refinements of the myosin motor head and its essential light chains in these reconstructions reveal that small changes in the nucleotide-binding site are coupled to significant rigid body movements of the myosin converter domain and a 16-degree lever arm swing. Our structures provide a mechanistic framework to understand the effect of ADP binding and release on human cardiac β-myosin, and offer insights into the force-sensing mechanism displayed by the cardiac myosin motor.

During force-generating steps of the muscle crossbridge cycle, the tip of the myosin motor, specifically loop-4, contacts the tropomyosin cable of actin filaments. In the current study, we determined the corresponding effect of myosin loop-4 on the regulatory positioning of tropomyosin on actin. To accomplish this, we compared high-resolution cryo-EM structures of myosin S1-decorated thin filaments containing either wild-type or a loop-4 mutant construct, where the seven-residue portion of myosin loop-4 that contacts tropomyosin was replaced by glycine residues, thus removing polar side chains from residues 366–372. Cryo-EM analysis of fully decorated actin-tropomyosin filaments with wild-type and mutant S1, yielded 3.4–3.6 Å resolution reconstructions, with even higher definition at the actin-myosin interface. Loop-4 densities both in wild-type and mutant S1 were clearly identified, and side chains were resolved in the wild-type structure. Aside from loop-4, actin and myosin structural domains were indistinguishable from each other when filaments were decorated with either mutant or wild-type S1. In marked contrast, the position of tropomyosin on actin in the two reconstructions differed by 3 to 4 Å. In maps of filaments containing the mutant, tropomyosin was located closer to the myosin-head and thus moved in the direction of the C-state conformation adopted by myosin-free thin filaments. Complementary interaction energy measurements showed that tropomyosin in the mutant thin filaments sits on actin in a local energy minimum, whereas tropomyosin is positioned by wild-type S1 in an energetically unfavorable location. We propose that the high potential energy associated with tropomyosin positioning in wild-type filaments favors an effective transition to B- and C-states following release of myosin from the thin filaments during relaxation.

No abstract

Translation initiation in eukaryotes requires multiple eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) and involves continuous remodeling of the ribosomal preinitiation complex (PIC). The GTPase eIF2 brings the initiator Met‐tRNAi to the PIC. Upon start codon selection and GTP hydrolysis promoted by its GTPase‐activating protein (GAP) eIF5, eIF2‐GDP is released in complex with eIF5. It is not known how eIF5 dissociates from its other binding partners to leave the PIC with only eIF2. Here, we report that two intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in eIF5, the DWEAR motif and the C‐terminal tail (CTT) dynamically contact the folded C‐terminal domain (CTD) and compete with each other. The eIF5‐CTD•CTT interaction shows modest synergy with eIF2β binding to eIF5‐CTD, whereas the eIF5‐CTD•DWEAR interaction favors eIF1A binding, instead. These findings allowed us to propose a model explaining how the rearrangement of the eIF5 intramolecular contacts can mediate remodeling of multiple interactions upon start codon selection. Using phosphomimetic mutations, we show that phosphorylation of eIF5 by Casein Kinase 2 (CK2) increases the affinity of eIF5 for eIF2β. Our results help elucidate the molecular mechanisms of stimulation of protein synthesis and cell proliferation by CK2.