The evolution of organic aerosol (OA) and brown carbon (BrC) in wildfire plumes, including the relative contributions of primary versus secondary sources, has been uncertain in part because of limited knowledge of the precursor emissions and the chemical environment of smoke plumes. We made airborne measurements of a suite of reactive trace gases, particle composition, and optical properties in fresh western US wildfire smoke in July through August 2018. We use these observations to quantify primary versus secondary sources of biomass-burning OA (BBPOA versus BBSOA) and BrC in wildfire plumes. When a daytime wildfire plume dilutes by a factor of 5 to 10, we estimate that up to one-third of the primary OA has evaporated and subsequently reacted to form BBSOA with near unit yield. The reactions of measured BBSOA precursors contribute only 13 ± 3% of the total BBSOA source, with evaporated BBPOA comprising the rest. We find that oxidation of phenolic compounds contributes the majority of BBSOA from emitted vapors. The corresponding particulate nitrophenolic compounds are estimated to explain 29 ± 15% of average BrC light absorption at 405 nm (BrC Abs405) measured in the first few hours of plume evolution, despite accounting for just 4 ± 2% of average OA mass. These measurements provide quantitative constraints on the role of dilution-driven evaporation of OA and subsequent radical-driven oxidation on the fate of biomass-burning OA and BrC in daytime wildfire plumes and point to the need to understand how processing of nighttime emissions differs.
Despite increasing incidence of wildfires in the UnitedStates, wildfire smoke is poorly characterized, with little known about particle composition and emission rates. Chemistry in transported plumes confounds interpretation of ground and aircraft data, but nearfield observations can potentially disentangle the effects of oxidation and dilution on aerosol mass and chemical composition. We report the organic aerosol (OA) emission ratios from aircraft observations near the fire source for the 20 wildfires sampled during the Western Wildfire Experiment: Cloud Chemistry, Aerosol Absorption, and Nitrogen (WE-CAN) study of summer 2018. We observe no changes in submicron nonrefractory OA mass concentration, relative to CO which accounts for simple dilution, between 0.5 and up to 8 h of aging. However, static OA excess mixing ratios hide shifts in the aerosol chemical composition that suggest near-balanced, simultaneous oxidation-driven condensation and dilution-driven evaporation. Specifically, we observe significant increases in the extent of oxidation, evident by an increase in oxidation marker f 44 and loss of the biomass burning marker f 60 , as the smoke ages through chemistry and dilution. We discuss the competing effects of oxidative chemistry and dilution-driven evaporation on the evolution of the chemical composition of aerosols in wildfire smoke over time.
Aerosols impact climate, human health, and the chemistry of the atmosphere, and aerosol pH plays a major role in the physicochemical properties of the aerosol. However, there remains uncertainty as to whether aerosols are acidic, neutral, or basic. In this research, we show that the pH of freshly emitted (nascent) sea spray aerosols is significantly lower than that of sea water (approximately four pH units, with pH being a log scale value) and that smaller aerosol particles below 1 μm in diameter have pH values that are even lower. These measurements of nascent sea spray aerosol pH, performed in a unique ocean−atmosphere facility, provide convincing data to show that acidification occurs “across the interface” within minutes, when aerosols formed from ocean surface waters become airborne. We also show there is a correlation between aerosol acidity and dissolved carbon dioxide but no correlation with marine biology within the seawater. We discuss the mechanisms and contributing factors to this acidity and its implications on atmospheric chemistry.
Wildfires have a significant adverse impact on air quality in the United States (US). To understand the potential health impacts of wildfire smoke, many epidemiology studies rely on concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM) as a smoke tracer. However, there are many gas-phase hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that are also present in wildfire smoke plumes. Using observations from the Western Wildfire Experiment for Cloud Chemistry, Aerosol Absorption, and Nitrogen (WE-CAN), a 2018 aircraft-based field campaign that measured HAPs and PM in western US wildfire smoke plumes, we identify the relationships between HAPs and associated health risks, PM, and smoke age. We find the ratios between acute, chronic noncancer, and chronic cancer HAPs health risk and PM in smoke decrease as a function of smoke age by up to 72% from fresh (<1 day of aging) to old (>3 days of aging) smoke. We show that acrolein, formaldehyde, benzene, and hydrogen cyanide are the dominant contributors to gas-phase HAPs risk in smoke plumes. Finally, we use ratios of HAPs to PM along with annual average smoke-specific PM to estimate current and potential future smoke HAPs risks.
Reactive nitrogen (N r) within smoke plumes plays important roles in the production of ozone, the formation of secondary aerosols, and deposition of fixed N to ecosystems. The Western Wildfire Experiment for Cloud Chemistry, Aerosol Absorption, and Nitrogen (WE-CAN) field campaign sampled smoke from 23 wildfires throughout the western U.S. during summer 2018 using the NSF/NCAR C-130 research aircraft. We empirically estimate N r normalized excess mixing ratios and emission factors from fires sampled within 80 min of estimated emission and explore variability in the dominant forms of N r between these fires. We find that reduced N compounds comprise a majority (39%-80%; median = 66%) of total measured reactive nitrogen (ΣN r) emissions. The smoke plumes sampled during WE-CAN feature rapid chemical transformations after emission. As a result, within minutes after emission total measured oxidized nitrogen (ΣNO y) and measured total ΣNH x (NH 3 + pNH 4) are more robustly correlated with modified combustion efficiency (MCE) than NO x and NH 3 by themselves. The ratio of ΣNH x /ΣNO y displays a negative relationship with MCE, consistent with previous studies. A positive relationship with total measured ΣN r suggests that both burn conditions and fuel N content/volatilization differences contribute to the observed variability in the distribution of reduced and oxidized N r. Additionally, we compare our in situ field estimates of N r EFs to previous lab and field studies. For similar fuel types, we find ΣNH x EFs are of the same magnitude or larger than lab-based NH 3 EF estimates, and ΣNO y EFs are smaller than lab NO x EFs. Plain Language Summary Smoke from large wildfires in the western U.S. degrades air quality across the whole U.S. Smoke contains a mixture of many different gases and particles, including carbon compounds like carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, as well as nitrogen compounds such as ammonia and nitrogen oxides. Gases containing nitrogen are important for the production of ozone and the formation of more or larger particles as the smoke moves downwind. During the summer of 2018, we used the National Science Foundation/National Center for Atmospheric Research C130 research aircraft to fly through smoke across the western U.S. and measure many of the most abundant nitrogen compounds. We find that the smoke plumes we sampled emitted more nitrogen in a reduced form than in an oxidized form, and chemical reactions change the form and phase of nitrogen very quickly in the smoke. We compare our field measurements with laboratory measurements with the goal of using them together to improve our forecasts of how and where wildfire smoke will impact air quality. LINDAAS ET AL.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.