2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04497
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hazardous Air Pollutants in Fresh and Aged Western US Wildfire Smoke and Implications for Long-Term Exposure

Abstract: Wildfires have a significant adverse impact on air quality in the United States (US). To understand the potential health impacts of wildfire smoke, many epidemiology studies rely on concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM) as a smoke tracer. However, there are many gas-phase hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that are also present in wildfire smoke plumes. Using observations from the Western Wildfire Experiment for Cloud Chemistry, Aerosol Absorption, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
106
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
7
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, O'Dell et al. (2020) found general agreement between this chemical age categorization and physical age estimates of fresh smoke plumes samples during WE‐CAN. Thus, age uncertainties are unlikely to significantly impact our conclusions.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Furthermore, O'Dell et al. (2020) found general agreement between this chemical age categorization and physical age estimates of fresh smoke plumes samples during WE‐CAN. Thus, age uncertainties are unlikely to significantly impact our conclusions.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Based on the emissions and lifetime (e.g., at least a day), we would expect elevated levels of hydrogen cyanide, acetone, acetonitrile, and methyl ethyl ketone during smoke‐impacted periods (Akagi et al., 2012), although these species were not quantified by the instrument system used in this study. Some species that are both emitted and produced in smoke (e.g., acetaldehyde and formaldehyde) would also be present in aged smoke (O'Dell et al., 2020), but these species are also not available for this analysis. When a 7th factor is included in the PMF model to represent an additional source contribution from smoke in the entire summer dataset and the resultant 7‐factor solution is compared with the 6‐factor smoke‐free PMF solution, the results show that there is little difference in the percent contributions from each of the six nonsmoke factors to the observed NMVOC mixing ratios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also assigned a broader set of smoke plume intercepts an approximate chemical age following O'Dell et al. (2020). This assignment of chemical age is useful because it allows us to examine the partitioning of NH x in all the smoke samples intercepted during WE‐CAN, not just those that were sampled in a pseudo‐lagrangian fashion from known fires.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%