Background:
The high accuracy of feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging qualifies this novel modality as potential gold standard for myocardial strain analyses in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients; however, the incremental prognostic validity of feature-tracking-CMR over left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and myocardial damage remains unclear. This study therefore aimed to determine the value of myocardial strain measured by feature-tracking-CMR for the prediction of clinical outcome following ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Methods:
This prospective observational study enrolled 451 revascularized ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Comprehensive CMR investigations were performed 3 (interquartile range, 2–4) days after infarction to determine LVEF, global longitudinal strain (GLS), global radial strain, and global circumferential strain as well as myocardial damage. Primary end point was a composite of death, re-infarction, and congestive heart failure (major adverse cardiac events [MACE]).
Results:
During a follow-up of 24 (interquartile range, 11–48) months, 46 patients (10%) experienced a MACE event. All 3 strain indices were impaired in patients with MACE (all
P
<0.001). However, GLS emerged as the strongest MACE prognosticator among strain parameters (area under the curve, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.69–0.77]) and was significantly better (
P
=0.005) than LVEF (area under the curve, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59–0.68]). The association between GLS and MACE remained significant (
P
<0.001) after adjustment for global radial strain, global circumferential strain, and LVEF as well as for infarct size and microvascular obstruction. The addition of GLS to a risk model comprising LVEF, infarct size, and microvascular obstruction led to a net reclassification improvement (0.35 [95% CI, 0.14–0.55];
P
<0.001).
Conclusions:
GLS by feature-tracking-CMR strongly and independently predicted the occurrence of medium-term MACE in contemporary revascularized ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Importantly, the prognostic value of GLS was superior and incremental to LVEF and CMR markers of infarct severity.
Background
Acute complete occlusion of a coronary artery results in progressive ischemia, moving from the endocardium to the epicardium (ie, wavefront). Dependent on time to reperfusion and collateral flow, myocardial infarction (
MI
) will manifest, with transmural
MI
portending poor prognosis. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can detect
MI
with high diagnostic accuracy. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with
ST
‐segment–elevation MI with <12 hours of symptom onset. We sought to visualize time‐dependent necrosis in a population with
ST
‐segment–elevation MI by using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (STEMI‐SCAR project).
Methods and Results
ST
‐segment–elevation MI patients with single‐vessel disease, complete occlusion with TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) score 0, absence of collateral flow (Rentrop score 0), and symptom onset <12 hours were consecutively enrolled. Using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, the area at risk and infarct size, myocardial salvage index, transmurality index, and transmurality grade (0–50%, 51–75%, 76–100%) were determined. In total, 164 patients (aged 54±11 years, 80% male) were included. A receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the curve: 0.81) indicating transmural necrosis revealed the best diagnostic cutoff for a symptom‐to‐balloon time of 121 minutes: patients with >121 minutes demonstrated increased infarct size, transmurality index, and transmurality grade (all
P
<0.01) and decreased myocardial salvage index (
P
<0.001) versus patients with symptom‐to‐balloon times ≤121 minutes.
Conclusions
In MI with no residual antegrade and no collateral flow, immediate reperfusion is vital. A symptom‐to‐balloon time of >121 minutes causes a high grade of transmural necrosis. In this pure
ST
‐segment–elevation MI population, time to reperfusion to salvage myocardium was less than suggested by current guidelines.
Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the comparative prognostic value of mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) versus left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Methods CMR was performed in 255 STEMI patients within 2 days (interquartile range (IQR) 2-4 days) after infarction. CMR included MAPSE measurement on CINE 4-chamber view. Patients were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-death, non-fatal myocardial re-infarction, stroke, and new congestive heart failure. Results Patients with MACE (n = 35, 14%, median follow-up 3 years [IQR 1-4 years]) showed significantly lower MAPSE (8 mm [7-8.8] vs. 9.6 mm [8.1-11.5], p < 0.001). The association between decreased MAPSE (< 9 mm, optimal cutoff value by c-statistics) remained significant after adjustment for independent clinical and CMR predictors of MACE. The AUC of MAPSE for the prediction of MACE was 0.74 (CI 95% 0.65-0.82), significantly higher than that of LVEF (0.61 [CI 95% 0.50-0.71]; p < 0.001). Conclusions Reduced long-axis function assessed with MAPSE measurement using CINE CMR independently predicts longterm prognosis following STEMI. Moreover, MAPSE provided significantly higher prognostic implication in comparison with conventional LVEF measurement. Key Points • MAPSE determined by CMR independently predicts long-term prognosis following STEMI. • MACE-free survival is significantly higher in patients with MAPSE ≥ 9 mm than < 9 mm. • MAPSE provides significantly higher prognostic implication than conventional LVEF.
Background. Sarcopenia is an established risk factor predicting survival in chronically ill and trauma patients. We herein examine the assessment and clinical implication of sarcopenia in liver transplantation (LT). Methods. Computerized tomography scans from 172 patients waitlisted for LT were analyzed by applying 6 morphometric muscle scores, including 2 density indices (psoas density [PD] and skeletal muscle density [SMD]) and 4 scores based on muscle area (total psoas area, psoas muscle index, skeletal muscle area, and skeletal muscle index). Results. The prevalence of sarcopenia in our cohort ranged from 7.0% to 37.8%, depending on the score applied. Only sarcopenia as defined by the density indices PD and SMD (but not total psoas area, psoas muscle index, skeletal muscle area, or skeletal muscle index) revealed clinical relevance since it correlates significantly with postoperative complications (≥Grade III, Clavien-Dindo classification) and sepsis. Furthermore, sarcopenia predicted inferior patient and graft survival, with low muscle density (PD: <38.5 HU or SMD: <30 HU) representing an independent risk factor in a multivariate regression model (P < 0.05). Importantly, the widely used Eurotransplant donor risk index had a predictive value in nonsarcopenic patients but failed to predict graft survival in patients with sarcopenia. Conclusions. Sarcopenia revealed by low muscle density correlates with major complications following LT and acts as an independent predictor for patient and graft survival. Therefore, the application of a simple computerized tomographymorphologic index can refine an individual recipient's risk estimate in a personalized approach to transplantation.
• Combination of B-mode US and SEL proved efficiency in diagnosing lateral epicondylitis. • Combination of B-mode US and SEL in lateral epicondylitis correlates to histology. • Combination of both modalities provides improved sensitivity without loss of specificity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.