BackgroundNatural killer cells are known to have anti-tumor activity in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We hypothesized that reconstituted circulating natural killer cells may be associated with improved relapse-free survival after HLA-matched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
In a single-center study, we analyzed the outcomes of 66 patients with advanced hematological malignancies receiving two reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for allogeneic transplantation: fludarabine and low-dose TBI (flu/TBI, n ¼ 25), or fludarabine, antithymocyte globulin and BU (flu/ATG/BU, n ¼ 41). The selection criteria were based on the hypothesis that flu/TBI patients were expected to achieve autologous recovery in the event of non-engraftment. Sixty-three patients (95%) engrafted. Regimen-related mortality at day 100 and 1 year was 6 and 15%, respectively. With median follow-up of 50.4 months, survival did not differ by regimen. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the type of regimen did not affect relapse. In patients achieving full donor chimerism by day 30, those conditioned with flu/TBI showed greater overall survival (P ¼ 0.02). Engraftment failure occurred in two patients (3%), both of whom received flu/TBI. We conclude that conditioning with flu/TBI or flu/ATG/BU yields comparable survival and remission outcomes. By contrast to our hypothesis, patients receiving flu/TBI who subsequently failed engraftment did not achieve autologous recovery. Yet, rapid attainment of full donor chimerism after flu/TBI is associated with greater survival than after flu/ATG/BU. Further, larger prospective randomized studies are required to define the advantage of one regimen over the other.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.