No abstract

No abstract

Fine‐grained (<63 μm) suspended sediment is an important vector for transporting contaminants in aquatic systems. Characterization of physical and biogeochemical properties of suspended sediment usually requires bulk samples to assess its quality and to determine its source. Low‐flow rate (~2 to 4 L min−1) continuous‐flow centrifugation (CFC) systems may need a time period from several hours to one day to collect such samples, and thus, due to their low inflow rate, limits application of these devices. A field study was conducted in three different freshwater systems in Manitoba, Canada to examine and compare the performance of two high‐flow rate systems as alternative approaches: the M512 continuous‐flow centrifuge (M512); and continuous filtration using PENTEK 1 μm filtration bags (filtration system). It was determined that the mass collection efficiency (MCE) for the M512 (in absolute terms) was similar to low‐flow rate CFC systems. As with low‐flow rate CFC systems, the M512 preferentially collected particles of a certain size range (i.e., in the case of M512, particles ≥ 0.83 μm) and accordingly this may affect the collection of a truly geochemically and physically representative sample in waters containing a high proportion of finer particles (≤1 μm). Several filtration systems in series improved its MCE performance and, in terms of total collected mass, this configuration appears to be as efficient as the low‐flow rate CFC systems in an equivalent sampling time. The results of this study confirmed that, in nearly all cases, the filtration system collected a representative sample of ambient suspended sediment, in terms of particle size composition, and geochemical and colour properties. In practice, it is suggested that the filtration systems in series have advantages over M512 as the filtration system is more portable and cost‐effective with a lower power demand.

No abstract

Sediment erosion and deposition rates are two of the most important factors that influence fluvial geomorphology. Several experimental devices have been constructed to estimate cohesive sediment erosion rate. However, estimated erosion rates may not be reliable for large rivers due to limited soil sampling and a high dependency of cohesive sediment behaviour on several physical, mechanical, and electrochemical properties of the sediment and eroding fluid. A new methodology has been developed to estimate the erosion and deposition rate of wide rivers using in situ measurements. To test this methodology, an acoustic Doppler current profiler was used to collect bathymetry and velocity profiles over a study area along the Red River in Winnipeg, Canada. Sediment concentration profiles along an 8.5 km reach of the river were measured several times under different flow conditions. Finally, an advection–dispersion equation was numerically solved using measured and calculated streamwise dispersion coefficients, flow and channel characteristics to calculate net erosion and deposition over the study area. Moreover, an exponential relationship was obtained between the river discharge and longitudinal dispersion coefficient for the Red River.

The Burntwood River (BR) and Upper Nelson River (UNR) are regulated rivers in the subarctic region of Canada. They merge at Split Lake and then discharge into Hudson Bay via the Lower Nelson River (LNR). The BR water discharge was increased eightfold by a cross-watershed diversion in 1976. The UNR drains the 11 th largest lake in the world, Lake Winnipeg, which itself receives discharge from a large North Ameri-

Collecting a representative time‐integrated sample of fluvial fine‐grained suspended sediment (<63 μm) is an important requirement for the understanding of environmental, geomorphological, and hydrological processes operating within watersheds. This study (a) characterized the hydrodynamic behaviour of a commonly used time‐integrated fine sediment sampler (TIFSS) using an acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) in controlled laboratory conditions and (b) measured the mass collection efficiency (MCE) of the sampler by an acoustic Doppler current profiler under field conditions. The laboratory results indicated that the hydrodynamic evaluations associated with the original development of the TIFSS involved an underestimation of the inlet flow velocity of the sampler that results in a significant overestimation of the theoretical MCE. The ADV data illustrated that the ratio of the inlet flow velocity of the sampler to the ambient velocity was 87% and consequently, it can be assumed that a representative sample of the ambient fine suspended particles entered into the sampler. The field results showed that the particle size distribution of the sediment collected by the TIFSS was statistically similar to that for the ambient sediment in the Red River, Manitoba, Canada. The MCE of the TIFSS in the field trials appeared to be as low as 10%. Collecting a representative sample in the field was consistent with the previous findings that the TIFSS is a suitable sampler for the collection of a representative sample of sufficient mass (e.g., >1 g) for the investigation of the properties of fluvial fine‐grained suspended sediment. Hydrodynamic evaluation of the TIFSS under a wider range of hydraulic conditions is suggested to assess the performance of the sampler during high run‐off events.

No abstract