2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive fluvial geomorphology study of riverbank erosion on the Red River in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect has been widely discussed and therefore, the obtained results confirm its validity. In addition, the increased mean temperature provokes the thawing of the frozen shallow soil layers, which reduces the soil strength and therefore, loosens the surface and makes it susceptible to the different erosive agents [90].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect has been widely discussed and therefore, the obtained results confirm its validity. In addition, the increased mean temperature provokes the thawing of the frozen shallow soil layers, which reduces the soil strength and therefore, loosens the surface and makes it susceptible to the different erosive agents [90].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the cylinder was covered with a lid and kept under a static condition for 7 days. During sediment suspension, the perforated grids were oscillated with vertical amplitude of 3.2 cm (between 5.0 and 8.2 cm above from the sediment surface), and they were driven by the speed motor with 150 rpm, corresponding to 6.4 N/m 2 , which was in the range of erosion shear stress (0.2-75 N/m 2 ) found in natural rivers (Babaeyan-Koopaei et al, 2002;Keevil et al, 2015;Kimiaghalam et al, 2015;Krishnappan and Marsalek, 2002;Reungoat et al, 2014). Furthermore, the experimental parameters including water depth and the sediment thickness used in this study are similar to other simulation experiments Schneider et al, 2007).…”
Section: Sediment Resuspension Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() between the morphological activity rate of the river bank and the water discharge in a British upland catchment. However, it has been proven that non‐fluvial factors such as the geotechnical properties of bank soil and the change in groundwater level can also play an important role in bank retreat processes (Simon et al ., ; Couper, ; Chiang et al ., ; Karmaker and Dutta, ; Xia et al ., ; Kimiaghalam et al ., ). In terms of geotechnical properties, cohesive bank soil usually has a stronger resistance to erosion than non‐cohesive bank soil, due to the electromechanical cohesive forces among soil particles and the stronger shear strength of the soil (Thorne et al ., ; Karmaker and Dutta, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%