Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) have been studied for the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI). In previous studies, we showed that the transplantation of BMSCs, even though they disappeared from the host spinal cord within 1-3 weeks after transplantation, improved locomotor behaviors and promoted axonal regeneration. This result led to the hypothesis that BMSCs might release some neurotrophic factors effective for the treatment of SCI. The present study examined this by injecting the conditioned medium (CM) of BMSCs to treat SCI in rats. The spinal cord was contusion-injured, followed immediately by continuous injection for 2 weeks of the CM of BMSCs through the cerebrospinal fluid via the 4th ventricle using an Alzet osmotic pump. Locomotor behaviors evaluated by the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan score were markedly improved in the CM-injection group, compared with the control group, at 1 to 4 weeks post-injection. The contusion-injured site of the spinal cord was identified as an astrocyte-devoid area, which contained no astrocytes but was filled with collagen matrices and empty cavities of various sizes. Collagen matrices contained type I collagen and laminin. Numerous axons extended through the collagen matrices of the astrocyte-devoid area. Axons were surrounded by Schwann cells, exhibiting the same morphological characteristics as peripheral nerve fibers. The density of axons extending through the astrocyte-devoid area was higher in the CM-injection group, compared with the control group. CM injection had beneficial effects on locomotor improvements and tissue repair, including axonal regeneration, meaning that the BMSC-CM stimulated the intrinsic ability of the spinal cord to regenerate. Activation of the intrinsic ability of the spinal cord to regenerate by the injection of neurotrophic factors such as BMSC-CM is considered to be a safe and preferable method for the clinical treatment of SCI.
The effects of multiple injection of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNCs) on spinal cord injury (SCI) were compared with those of single injection in rats. BMNCs separated by density-gradient centrifugation from a bone marrow perfusate were injected three times (once weekly) through the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) via the fourth ventricle, and the locomotor improvement and tissue recovery, including axonal regeneration, were compared with those of single injection. While the single-injection group showed a steep elevation of the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) score 1 week after transplantation, the multiple-injection group maintained a similar steep elevation for 2 weeks after transplantation, and the BBB scores of the multiple-injection group remained thereafter at a level approximately 2-3 points higher than those of the single-injection group until the end of the experiment. There were significant differences between the single- and multiple-injection groups at 3, 4, and 8 weeks after transplantation. The difference in BBB scores at 8 weeks after transplantation suggested that there was a marked difference in the quality of locomotor behaviors between the single-and multiple-injection groups at this stage. An extensive outgrowth of regenerating axons through the astrocyte-devoid areas and a marked reduction of cavity formation were found in both the single- and multiple-injection groups. There were, however, no significant differences in the density of regenerating axons or volumes of cavities between the single- and multiple-injection groups. These results showed that although tissue recoveries were similar between single and multiple injection, the multiple injection of BMNCs was more beneficial for locomotor improvement than single injection for the treatment of SCI. Considering the technically simple and low-cost procedures for the preparation and injection of BMNCs, multiple injection of BMNCs by lumbar puncture has an advantage over single injection on clinical application.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.