Behaviour problems in Romanian orphans adopted to Canada were examined through parents’ interview reports of specific problems, and children’s scores on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (Achenbach, Edelbrock, & Howell, 1987) completed by their parents. Three groups of children were studied. Romanian orphanage (RO) children had spent at least 8 months in a Romanian orphanage. Parents’ reports of RO children’s problems were compared to parent reports from 2 comparison groups: (1) Canadian-born children (CB) who were not adopted and never institutionalised; and (2) children who would have gone to a Romanian orphanage had they not been adopted before 4 months of age (Romanian Comparison: RC). RO children scored higher than CB and RC children for Total problems and Internalizing problems on the CBCL. No significant differences were found for any group comparison on Externalizing problems. CBCL scores were positively correlated with RO children’s total time in orphanage. According to parent interview, RO children had more eating problems, medical problems, and stereotyped behaviour problems than both CB and RC children. These problems were distinctive ones, rarely if ever being reported for CB or RC children. It is suggested that these distinctive RO problems arise out of a normal developmental base, and reflect either continuations of orphanage behaviours, reactions to stimuli different from those experienced in orphanage, or lack of opportunity for development or learning within the orphanage.

Low plasma busulfan (Bu) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is associated with graft failure and relapsed leukemias, and high AUC with toxicities when Bu is used orally or i.v. 4 times daily combined with cyclophosphamide in myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) conditioning regimens. We report Bu AUC and its association with clinical outcomes in 130 patients with hematologic malignancies given a once-daily i.v. Bu (3.2 mg/kg days -5 to -2) and fludarabine (Flu, 50 mg/m(2) days -6 to -2) regimen. Total-body irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy x 2 was added for 51 patients with acute leukemias. Plasma AUC varied 3.6-fold (2184-7794 microM.min, median 4699 microM.min). Patients with an AUC >6000 microM.min had lower overall survival (OS) than those with AUC < or =6000 microM.min at 12 months (38% versus 74%) and 36 months (23% versus 68%, P < .001). This effect was apparent in patients with standard-risk and high-risk disease, and persisted when potential confounders were considered (hazard ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.7-6.3). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days (6% versus 19%) and progression free survival (PFS; 58% versus 16%) at 3 years were better with AUC < or =6000 microM.min. These data support a role for therapeutic dose monitoring and dose adjustment with daily i.v. busulfan.

HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) has improved donor availability. However, a matched sibling donor (MSD) is still considered the optimal donor. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT vs MSD in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Data from 1205 adult CR1 AML patients (2008-2015) were analyzed. A total of 336 patients underwent PT-Cy–based Haplo-HCT and 869 underwent MSD using calcineurin inhibitor–based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The Haplo-HCT group included more reduced-intensity conditioning (65% vs 30%) and bone marrow grafts (62% vs 7%), consistent with current practice. In multivariable analysis, Haplo-HCT and MSD groups were not different with regard to overall survival (P = .15), leukemia-free survival (P = .50), nonrelapse mortality (P = .16), relapse (P = .90), or grade II-IV acute GVHD (P = .98). However, the Haplo-HCT group had a significantly lower rate of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.48; P &lt; .001). Results of subgroup analyses by conditioning intensity and graft source suggested that the reduced incidence of chronic GVHD in Haplo-HCT is not limited to a specific graft source or conditioning intensity. Center effect and minimal residual disease–donor type interaction were not predictors of outcome. Our results indicate a lower rate of chronic GVHD after PT-Cy–based Haplo-HCT vs MSD using calcineurin inhibitor–based GVHD prophylaxis, but similar other outcomes, in patients with AML in CR1. Haplo-HCT is a viable alternative to MSD in these patients.

A myeloablative conditioning regimen incorporating daily intravenous busulfan, fludarabine, and 400 cGy total-body irradiation was given before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) to 64 adults with acute leukemia in first and second remission. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included methotrexate, cyclosporine A, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin). For 31 matched related (MRD) and 33 alternate donor (AD) SCT the incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV was 11% +/- 6% versus 35% +/- 9% (P = .047), acute GVHD grade III-IV was 0% versus 10% +/- 6% (P = .09), and chronic GVHD was 40% +/- 9% versus 66% +/- 9% (P = NS), respectively. Overall transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 3% +/- 2%. Projected disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (n = 36) are the same at 83% +/- 6%, and for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n = 28) are 65% +/- 10% and 78% +/- 8%, respectively. For MRD SCT DFS is 77% +/- 9%, OS 87% +/- 6%, for AD SCT the respective figures are 71% +/- 8% and 74% +/- 8%. OS and DFS in patients without and with high-risk features are 100% versus 71% +/- 7% (P = .007) and 88% +/- 8% versus 68% +/- 7% (P = .04), respectively. This combination appears relatively well tolerated, gives equivalent final outcomes from MRD and AD, and may be a reasonable alternative to conventional myeloablative regimens.

Cytogenetics play a major role in determining the prognosis of patients with AML. However, the existing cytogenetics classifications were developed on chemotherapy-treated patients and may not be optimal for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We studied 821 adult patients reported to the CIBMTR who underwent HCT for AML in first or second CR between 1999 and 2004. We compared the ability of the 6 existing classifications to stratify patients by overall survival (OS). We then defined a new schema specifically applicable to HCT patients using this patient cohort. Under this CIBMTR schema, inv(16) is favorable, complex karyotype (4+ abnormalities) is adverse, and all other classified abnormalities are intermediate in predicting survival after HCT (5y OS 64%, 18%, and 50%, respectively, p=0.0001). This schema stratified patients into 3 groups with similar non-relapse mortality, but significantly different incidences of relapse, overall and leukemia-free survival. It applied to patients regardless of their disease status (CR1 or CR2), donor type (MRD or URD), or conditioning intensity (myeloablative or reduced intensity). This transplantation-specific classification could be adopted for prognostication purposes and to stratify patients with AML and karyotypic abnormalities entering HCT clinical trials.

Outpatient management of AML is safe and feasible using the strategies outlined in this report.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P &lt; .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P &lt; .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P &lt; .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P &lt; .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.

A combination of fludarabine (Flu) and daily i.v. busulfan (Bu) is well tolerated and effective in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). The addition of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) may reduce morbidity and mortality from graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but lead to increased relapse. To compensate for this effect, we added 400 cGy of total body irradiation (TBI) to the Flu/Bu regimen in 89 patients, and compared outcomes with those achieved in 90 patients who received the drug combination alone. Although nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years did not differ between the groups, the inclusion of TBI significantly reduced relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15-0.54; P = .0001). Consequently, both overall survival (OS; HR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.3-0.84; P = .009) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.26-0.72; P = .001) were improved with the inclusion of TBI. This study confirms the importance of regimen intensity in allogeneic HSCT for AML. The combination of daily i.v. Bu, Flu, 400 cGy TBI, and ATG provides a well-tolerated regimen with antileukemic activity in AML comparable to that of other, conventional myeloablative (MA) regimens.