The snow leopard, Panthera uncia, is an elusive high-altitude specialist that inhabits vast, inaccessible habitat across Asia. We conducted the first range-wide genetic assessment of snow leopards based on noninvasive scat surveys. Thirty-three microsatellites were genotyped and a total of 683 bp of mitochondrial DNA sequenced in 70 individuals. Snow leopards exhibited low genetic diversity at microsatellites (A N = 5.8, H O = 0.433, H E = 0.568), virtually no mtDNA variation, and underwent a bottleneck in the Holocene (∼8000 years ago) coinciding with increased temperatures, precipitation, and upward treeline shift in the Tibetan Plateau. Multiple analyses supported 3 primary genetic clusters: (1) Northern (the Altai region), (2) Central (core Himalaya

Aim: Comprehensive, global information on species’ occurrences is an essential biodiversity variable and central to a range of applications in ecology, evolution, biogeography and conservation. Expert range maps often represent a species’ only available distributional information and play an increasing role in conservation assessments and macroecology. We provide global range maps for the native ranges of all extant mammal species harmonised to the taxonomy of the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) mobilised from two sources, the Handbook of the Mammals of the World (HMW) and the Illustrated Checklist of the Mammals of the World (CMW). Location: Global. Taxon: All extant mammal species. Methods: Range maps were digitally interpreted, georeferenced, error-checked and subsequently taxonomically aligned between the HMW (6253 species), the CMW (6431 species) and the MDD taxonomies (6362 species). Results: Range maps can be evaluated and visualised in an online map browser at Map of Life ( mol.org ) and accessed for individual or batch download for non-commercial use. Main conclusion: Expert maps of species’ global distributions are limited in their spatial detail and temporal specificity, but form a useful basis for broad-scale characterizations and model-based integration with other data. We provide georeferenced range maps for the native ranges of all extant mammal species as shapefiles, with species-level metadata and source information packaged together in geodatabase format. Across the three taxonomic sources our maps entail, there are 1784 taxonomic name differences compared to the maps currently available on the IUCN Red List website. The expert maps provided here are harmonised to the MDD taxonomic authority and linked to a community of online tools that will enable transparent future updates and version control.

Parasites exploit hosts to replicate and transmit, but overexploitation kills host and parasite (1): predators may shift this cost-benefit balance by consuming hosts (2-4) or changing host behavior, but the strength of these effects remains unclear. Modeling both, we find a primary, strong effect: hosts group to defend against predators (5), increasing parasite transmission, thus multiple infections, and therefore favoring more exploitative, virulent, parasites (6). Indeed, among 18 Trinidadian Gyrodactyus spp. parasite lines, those collected from high predation guppy populations were more virulent in common garden than those from low .

No abstract

Social interactions with conspecifics are key to the fitness of most animals and, through the transmission opportunities they provide, are also key to the fitness of their parasites. As a result, research to date has largely focused on the role of host social behavior in imposing selection on parasites, particularly their virulence and transmission phenotypes. However, host social behavior also influences the distribution of parasites among hosts, with implications for their evolution through non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift, and thus ability to respond to that selection. Here, we review the paucity of empirical studies on parasites, and draw from empirical studies of free-living organisms and population genetic theory to propose several mechanisms by which host social behavior potentially drives parasite evolution through these less-well studied mechanisms. We focus on the guppy host and Gyrodactylus (Monogenea) ectoparasitic flatworm system and follow a spatially hierarchical outline to highlight that social behavior varies between individuals, and between host populations across the landscape, generating a mosaic of ecological and evolutionary outcomes for their infecting parasites. We argue that the guppy-Gyrodactylus system presents a unique opportunity to address this fundamental knowledge gap in our understanding of the connection between host social behavior and parasite evolution. Individual differences in host social behavior generates fine-scale changes in the spatial distribution of parasite genotypes, shape the size, and diversity of their infecting parasite populations and may generate non-random mating on, and non-random transmission between hosts. While at population and metapopulation level, variation in host social behavior interacts with landscape structure to affect parasite gene flow, effective population size, and genetic drift to alter the coevolutionary potential of local adaptation. Significance statementSocial interactions between animals shape the evolution of the pathogens that infect them. Most research exploring this phenomenon has focused on the selection such interactions impose, but social hosts also shape parasite evolution by determining the ability of their parasites to respond to that selection. Here, we explore how host social behavior drives parasite evolution by shaping non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift, from the scale of the individual to the landscape. The relative strength of these evolutionary mechanisms can have striking implications for the evolution of parasite traits such as virulence and alter the evolutionary trajectories of populations across the landscape. We emphasize the importance of studies combining parasite population genetics, host social behavior, and landscape processes to illuminate complex host-parasite coevolutionary dynamics.

Parasites exploit hosts to replicate and transmit, but overexploitation kills both host and parasite: parasite virulence evolves to balance these costs and benefits. Predators can in theory shift this balance by consuming hosts. However, the non-consumptive effects of predators may be as important as their consumptive effects. Here, we use an eco-coevolutionary model to show that predators select for host grouping, a common anti-predator, defensive social behaviour. Host grouping simultaneously increases parasite transmission, thus within-host parasite competition, and therefore favours more exploitative, virulent, parasites. When parametrized with data from the guppy-Gyrodactylus spp. system, including our experimentally demonstrated trade-off between virulence and transmission, our model accurately predicted the common garden-assayed virulence of 18 parasite lines collected from four Trinidadian guppy populations under different predation regimes. The quantitative match between theory and data lends credence to the model insight that the non-consumptive, social behaviour pathway is entirely responsible for the observed increase in virulence with predation pressure. Our results indicate that parasites play an important, underappreciated role in guppy evolutionary ecology. Moreover, group living is a common anti-predator defence and our general model accommodates host-parasite interactions across taxa: its insight into the interactions among predation, sociality, and virulence evolution may apply broadly. Our results additionally suggest that social distancing, by reducing host-host contact, can select for less virulent parasites and pathogens.

Field research can be an important component of the career trajectories for researchers in numerous academic fields; however, conducting research in field settings poses risks to health and safety, and researchers from marginalized groups often face greater risks than those experienced by other researchers in their fields; If these additional risks are not actively and thoughtfully mitigated, they are likely to hinder the participation of qualified investigators in field research and counteract efforts to improve and promote diversity, equity and inclusion in the field sciences. Here we provide, from our perspectives as co‐authors of a field safety manual for the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania, United States, (A) background on risks and barriers that should be considered when planning and conducting field research and (B) suggestions on how to work as a collaborative team for developing an inclusive field safety manual. As an example of a manual this proposed process has yielded, we have included our own field safety manual written with diversity, equity and inclusion as a central focus. We hope this publication serves as a starting point for those interested in developing a similar document for use in their laboratory group, department or institution.

No abstract