Actitud y habilidades del médico residente de pediatría en la enseñanza de los médicos internos de pregrado, experiencia en hospitales públicos y privados al noroeste de México
Introduction: The Calgary Family Medicine (FM) Residency Program implemented a competency-based curriculum in 2012 (Triple C). To meet the College of Family Physicians' accreditation standards, the Program also implemented a new assessment program. Field notes (FNs) were introduced to record feedback and to provide data for decisions around Resident competence and progress. Validation of inferences from data collected in field notes is sparse, particularly in relation to how the data can be extrapolated to competence and professional practice. This study investigates the quality and trustworthiness of FNs when their content is used to make decisions about a Resident's competence. Methods: Assessment data from over 3100 FNs, 99 inprogram progress decisions, and scores on the the SOOs and SAMPs components of the College of CFPC Certification Examination in FM were analysed for 16 randomly selected Residents who had successfully completed the Urban FM Residency Program in Calgary under the Triple C Curriculum. Six independent raters (FM community preceptors) were recruited to review copies of the same sets of FNs that were originally used by in-program preceptors to assess Resident progress. 2 independent blinded raters were randomly assigned to each set of FNs. Raters were asked to use FN data to decide on Resident progress, and indicate their level of confidence in their decisions. This was compared with Peer Review under the responsibility of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. the actual in-program progress decision previously made for each Resident. Quality of FNs was assessed using a Formative Feedback Evaluation Tool (FFET), and were scored 1-5. Results: The quality of the FN data was found to be suboptimal (mean 2.27). The consistency of raters' progress decisions was high (89%). Correlation analyses indicated a significant weak positive relationship between quality of FNs and raters' confidence, r(196) = .201, p = .005; a significant moderate positive linear relationship between number of FNs and raters' confidence, r(196) = .30, p < .001; and a significant moderate positive linear relationship between total number of FNs received by a resident and the residents z-scores in the SAMPS component of the CFPC exam, r(14) = .55, p = .026 Conclusion: The results provide evidence supporting the validity of assessment decisions based on Field Note data. The quality and number as well as the quality of the FNs appears important in supporting the trustworthiness of summative progress decisions.
El cuidado del equipo interprofesional de salud es un factor indispensable para que el sistema sanitario funcione de manera estable y resiliente, especialmente cuando la presión se vuelve extrema. La pandemia, además de poner a prueba los sistemas de salud y sus actores, ha dejado algunas dudas respecto a los alcances del profesionalismo, frente a las demandas y expectativas que la sociedad tiene. Para efectos de la presente revisión, el concepto de profesionalismo en tiempos de crisis incluye controversias y dilemas que surgen en la relación con la sociedad, ética profesional y responsabilidad sobre el autocuidado. El compromiso y la resiliencia para garantizar el cuidado del paciente son evidentes en el actuar de los profesionales de la salud; sin embargo, en ocasiones esto ha ido en detrimento de su propia integridad física y moral. La agenda de salud en México está en deuda con médicos, residentes y profesionales de enfermería, una vía para saldarla es a través del fortalecimiento de las instituciones, la definición de políticas y normativas institucionales que promuevan el autocuidado y, entre otras medidas, el establecimiento de sistemas que no obliguen a aquéllos a convertirse en héroes enfrentados a los riesgos de una crisis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.