JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. A study was made of how the economic orientation of an organization can influence its innovativeness. The effects of two factors, organizational slack and economic orientation, were studied in an empirical setting. Measures of these two variables were made in a group of hospitals and correlated with the frequency and promptness with which new drugs were tried in the hospitals. Trial of new drugs tended to vary directly with organizational slack and inversely with economic orientation. This is a special case, however, since the primary goal of hospitals is not economic, and the costs of trying of new drugs are minimal. It is suggested that the factors studied may be more important in more typical situations.Martin M. Rosner is associate professor in the College of Commerce at De Paul University.
Administrative control procedures and organizational innovation appear to be incompatible organizational processes. Administrative control procedures are used to maximize coordination and to ensure reliability and predictability of behavior in the organization. Innovations are used to facilitate adaptation to the environment and to improve achievement of organizational goals. Innovation may reduce the degree of reliability in the organization, and the use of administrative controls may reduce innovation. However, administrative controls assume two forms whose effects on innovation may differ. One form is activity control-the degree to which members of the organization use procedures or resources specified by their superiors. The other is visibility of consequences-the ability and willingness to measure the consequences of organizational programs in terms of organizational goals. The following general hypotheses are advanced: (1) innovation varies inversely with activity control because activity control reduces the search for new programs and abridges the individual's capacity and incentive to innovate; and (2) innovation varies directly with visibility of consequences, since visibility of consequences allows the owner of an organization to evaluate the innovation's effect on goal achievement and to reward and encourage successful innovators.The variables were measured in 24 short-term, voluntary, nonteaching hospitals in the Chicago area, ranging in size from 216 to 393 beds. Innovation was measured by the promptness and frequency of trial of new drugs. Activity control and visibility of consequences were measured by indices of hospital procedures affecting medical staff practices. The following operational hypotheses were advanced: (1) the greater the control over medical staff activities, the less prompt the trials of new drugs; (2) the greater the control over medical staff activities, the less frequent the trials of new drugs; (3) the higher the visibility over medical care, the more prompt the trials of new drugs; and (4) the higher the visibility over medical care, the more frequent the trials of new drugs. Multiple regression analyses of the data were made. Other factors likely to affect innovation were included in the regressions to control for their effects. Hypothesis 4 received support at the 0.06 level of significance and the others received support at the 0.10 level. The pattern of findings lends support to the general hypotheses. The findings assume added importance because hospital control over medical st& activities is minimal. The relationships may be more pronounced in more tightly controlled organizations. CCI)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.