1968
DOI: 10.2307/2391536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Determinants of Organizational Innovation

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. A study was made of how the economic orientation of an organization can influence its innovativeness. The effects of two factors, organizational slack and economic orientation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
6

Year Published

1974
1974
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Since large firms are usually endowed with more resources, particularly financial (Rosner, 1968) they have the ability to diversify into non-core areas. In pursuing opportunities in non-core areas large firms use knowledge transfer and research support relationships to build new competencies and create enabling technologies in ancillary areas that are not central to the firm's core business (Quadrant I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since large firms are usually endowed with more resources, particularly financial (Rosner, 1968) they have the ability to diversify into non-core areas. In pursuing opportunities in non-core areas large firms use knowledge transfer and research support relationships to build new competencies and create enabling technologies in ancillary areas that are not central to the firm's core business (Quadrant I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, large firms often pursue risky initiatives outside their current technological domain simply because they have the financial strength to do so (NSB, 1993(NSB, , 2000(NSB, , 1993Rosner, 1968). Large firms work with universities on industry-wide, pre-competitive issues related to a broad range of leading-edge technologies, many of which are unrelated to the firm's core business (Rea et al, 1997).…”
Section: Dynamic Firm Capabilities and Technology Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, firms in industries characterized by intensive technologies should have cultures characterized by high levels of innovation, since projects require nonroutine problem solving (Pennings & Harianto, 1992), and by a strong team orientation, since such ill-structured tasks are more likely to require that members collaborate to solve problems (e.g., Kanter, 1988). Opportunities for growth may, similarly, influence innovation (Gordon, 1985;Rosner, 1968) and a firm's desire to be unique or rare (Barney, 1986). For example, high growth rates increased innovation and flexibility among hightechnology firms in Silicon Valley (Saxenian, 1990).…”
Section: Links Between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Cumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universities provide their students and faculties with practical problems related to technological areas, and create employment opportunities for their graduates (NSB, 2000). Universities also interact with industry to access additional funds, particularly for research (Rosner, 1968;NSB, 2000). The role of government has developed from one of passive-assistance to a more active one involving stimulating the creation of linkages and facilitating the transfer of university innovations through incubator facilities and entrepreneurship centres (Klofsten et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%