In 2005, the German Aerospace Center (DLR) started an internal project, called TIVA, with the main goal to strengthen the multidisciplinary collaboration in the field of conceptual aircraft design. This approach was intended not only to couple disciplinary analysis tools from different institutes, but also to establish a process which keeps the disciplinary experts in the loop as well. Linking the tools and corresponding experts, this process should finally enable each discipline to study the consequences of their new concepts and technologies on overall aircraft level. One major component of this process is a new data exchange file format called CPACS, which serves as central interface and common language between the disciplinary analysis tools. The second key component is the integration framework, which allows the user to couple the single tools to multidisciplinary process chains for analysis and optimization tasks. Since the end of the TIVA project in 2009, the system is continuously being enhanced and extended in TIVA's successor-project VAMP, as well as in several other research projects which are based on this technology. For the near future, it is further planned to open the system with its major components to external partners and to use it for common projects with Industry and Universities.
Abstract:It is always a strong motivation for aeronautic researchers and engineers to reduce the aircraft emissions or even to achieve emission-free air transport. In this paper, the impacts of different game-changing technologies together on the reduction of aircraft fuel consumption and emissions are studied. In particular, a general tool has been developed for the technology assessment, integration and also for the overall aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization. The validity and robustness of the tool has been verified through comparative and sensitivity studies. The overall aircraft level technology assessment and optimization showed that promising fuel efficiency improvements are possible. Though, additional strategies are required to reach the aviation emission reduction goals for short and medium range configurations.
Preliminary design studies indicate that a cruise-efficient short takeoff and landing aircraft has enhanced takeoff performance at competitive direct operating costs when using high-speed propellers in combination with internally blown flaps. The original tractor configuration is compared to an over-the-wing propeller, which allows for noise shielding. An additional geometry with partially embedded rotor similar to a channel wing is considered to increase the beneficial interaction. This paper shows the aerodynamic integration effects with a focus on climb performance and provides an assessment of the three aforementioned configurations for a simplified wing segment at takeoff conditions. Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations have been conducted using an actuator disk model and were evaluated based on the overall design. Interacting with the blown flap, the conventional tractor propeller induces large lift and drag increments due to the vectored sliptream. Although this effect is much smaller for an overthe-wing configuration, by halving the lift augmentation, the lift-to-drag ratio and the propulsive efficiency are considerably improved. Besides a moderate lift gain, the main advantage of a channel wing design is the location of the thrust vector close to the center of gravity resulting in a smaller nosedown pitching moment due to thrust. A disadvantage of over-the-wing propellers is the inhomogeneous inflow at higher velocity, which leads to oscillating blade loads and reduced efficiency.lift coefficient of aircraft C M;y = M y ∕q ∞ · S ref · MAC, pitching moment coefficient of aircraft C P;s = shaft power coefficient C T = 2 · T∕q ∞ · S ref , thrust coefficient of aircraft c = chord length of rectangular wing segment c d = section drag coefficient c l = section lift coefficient c m = section pitching moment coefficient c p = p − p ∞ ∕q ∞ , pressure coefficient D P = propeller diameter p = static pressure q ∞ = dynamic pressure of freestream S ref = wing area of reference aircraft s = semispan of rectangular wing segment T = thrust of one engine T inst = T − ΔD, installed thrust t∕t max = relative blade element thrust V ∞ = freestream velocity α = angle of attack α e = effective angle of attack at blade element β 75= propeller blade pitch angle (at 75% radius) η P = propeller efficiency η Pro = propulsive efficiency ρ ∞ = density of freestream Subscripts x,y,z = Cartesian coordinates
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.