Purpose Sinonasal symptoms are prevalent in COPD, and knowledge of the relationship between these symptoms and clinical markers of COPD is limited. This study explores the associations between the burden of sinonasal symptoms and clinical markers and thresholds recommended for guiding treatment decisions in the GOLD guidelines. Patients and Methods Sinonasal symptoms were quantified with the rhinological subscale of the Sino-Nasal-Outcome-Test (SNOT-22) in 93 COPD patients characterized by the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) 2012 diagnostic criteria for rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (RSsNP). Associations between a high burden, defined as a SNOT22_rhinological score of ≥11, and the following markers were assessed by adjusted multivariable linear regressions; severity of dyspnea [modified Medical Research Council (mMRC)] and cough [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], physical activity [6-minute walking distance (6MWD)], mortality risk (BODE index), and HRQoL [disease-specific COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and physical component summary, Short Form-36 version 2.0 (PCS SF-36v2)]. Odds ratios for the association of a high burden and threshold levels for regular treatment were estimated by adjusted binomial logistic regression models. Results A high burden was associated with greater severity of dyspnea and cough, lower 6MWD, higher BODE index and poorer HRQoL. The odds ratio of having CAT and SGRQ scores that are above the thresholds recommended for treatment was 5–7-fold greater in the high burden group. Conclusion A high burden of sinonasal symptoms is positively associated with the clinical markers of symptom severity and mortality risk and is inversely associated with physical activity and HRQoL in COPD. These findings add further support that the UAD concept also applies to COPD. Enquiry about sinonasal symptoms in COPD patients should be incorporated into the clinical routine.

Background: Olfaction is poorly characterized in COPD. To test the hypothesis that olfaction is reduced in COPD, we assessed olfaction with the “Sniffin’ Sticks” test and a questionnaire addressing olfaction in COPD and a corresponding control group in respect to age and sex. We also explored whether there is an association between COPD, chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and other predefined covariates with olfactory function. Methodology: Olfactory function was assessed by the score for threshold (T), discrimination (D) and identification (I), and the composite TDI score in the “Sniffin’ Sticks” test and by self-reported evaluation of impaired olfaction and of “decreased sense of smell and taste” in the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) in 90 COPD patients and 93 controls. A clinical interview and ENT-examination with nasal endoscopy, skin prick test and spirometry with reversibility were performed. Results: The TDI, D and I scores were significantly lower in the COPD group than in the control group. The T score was not significantly different between the two groups. Hyposmia and anosmia were present in up to 79% of patients with COPD. The prevalence of self-reported impaired olfactory function and for 'decreased sense of smell and taste'; - was more than two-fold greater in the COPD than in the control group. COPD, higher age, male sex and allergy were associated with a lower TDI score, while CRSsNP was not associated with the TDI score. Conclusions: COPD is associated with olfactory dysfunction and the underlying mechanisms for this dysfunction should be elucidated.

Rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (RSsNP) is prevalent in COPD. Previous studies on its association with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) have limitations, and RSsNP is currently not recognized as a comorbidity. This study investigates HRQoL in COPD including a focus on RSsNP.Generic HRQoL was assessed with the Short Form-36 (SF-36v2) questionnaire and compared between 90 COPD and 93 control subjects and in subgroups with and without RSsNP. The association between RSsNP and COPD versus not and generic HRQoL was assessed by multivariable linear regression with adjustments for age, education, and body mass index (BMI). Disease-specific HRQoL was assessed by Sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and compared between COPD with and without RSsNP, and their association to RSsNP was assessed by multivariable linear regression with adjustments for age, BMI, and FEV 1 % predicted.RSsNP was associated with poorer disease-specific HRQoL, with higher SNOT-22 total score (14.67 points; 95% CI, 7.06-22.28; P < .001) and psychological subscale score (3.24 points; 95% CI, 0.37-6.11; P = .03), SGRQ symptom score (13.08 points; 95% CI, 2.73-23.4; P = .014), and CAT score (4.41 points; 95% CI, 1.15-7.66; P = .009).Generic HRQoL was poorer in COPD patients than in the control subjects. In addition to COPD, concomitant RSsNP was associated with poorer physical functioning, general health, vitality, and physical component summary.RSsNP in COPD is associated with poorer disease-specific HRQoL that is clinically relevant and, as it is amenable for treatment, should be recognized as a comorbidity of COPD.

Purpose The lack of epidemiological data on the proportion of olfactory dysfunction (OD) using comprehensive olfactory assessment in healthy adults in Scandinavia motivated to the present study which aimed to explore the proportion of OD in voluntary healthy Norwegian adults, assessed by Sniffin’ Sticks, and its correlation to self-reported olfactory function. Furthermore, sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with olfactory function were analysed. Methods The sample included 405 Norwegian participants, aged 18–78 years, 273 women and 132 men, who underwent olfactory testing with extensive Sniffin’ Sticks test, allergy testing, clinical examination with nasal endoscopy and completed a self-administered questionnaire, including self-evaluation of olfactory function on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale. Results We found that 37% had OD, of which 1.2% had anosmia assessed with extensive Sniffin’ Sticks test. The proportion of hyposmia and anosmia increased with age. Men and participants with low education had poorer olfactory function scores. Allergy, smoking status, general health and endoscopic findings were not associated with measured olfactory function. We found no correlation between self-reported and measured olfactory function. Conclusions This study has identified that a large proportion of our sample of voluntary healthy Norwegian adults have OD, considerably more common in older adults and somewhat more common in men and individuals with low education. The lack of correlation between self-reported and measured olfactory function highlights the importance of using validated tests for a reliable olfactory evaluation.