[1] A fundamental problem in avalanche engineering is to determine the impact pressures exerted on structures. This task is complicated because snow avalanches flow in a variety of regimes, primarily depending on snow temperature and moisture content. In this paper we address this problem by analyzing measured impact pressures, flow velocities, and flow depths of five Vallée de la Sionne avalanches. The measurements are made on a 20 m high tubular pylon instrumented with high-frequency pressure transducers and optoelectronic velocity sensors. In the observed avalanches, we find both subcritical and supercritical flow regimes. Typical Froude numbers were smaller than 6. The subcritical regime (Fr < 1) is characterized by a flow plug riding above a highly sheared basal layer. The measured pressures are large and velocity-independent in contradiction to calculation procedures. Pressure fluctuations increase with flow depth, indicating a kinematic stick-slip phenomena which is largest at the basal layer. Supercritical flow regimes (1 < Fr < 6) are characterized by a sheared flow all over the avalanche depth. In this regime the impact pressure is velocity-dependent. We derive relationships governing impact pressure as a function of the Froude number, and therefore flow regime, encompassing all the observed avalanches.Citation: Sovilla, B., M. Schaer, M. Kern, and P. Bartelt (2008), Impact pressures and flow regimes in dense snow avalanches observed at the Vallée de la Sionne test site,

[1] The snow surface height was precisely measured, with a laser scanner, before and after the passage of two dry-mixed avalanches in Vallée de la Sionne during the winter of [2005][2006]. The measurements were used to calculate the depth of the deposited snow along each entire avalanche path with a height resolution of 100 mm and a horizontal resolution of 500 mm. These data are much more accurate than any previous measurements from large avalanches and show that the deposit depth is strongly negatively correlated with the slope angle. That is, on steep slopes the deposit is shallow, and on gentle slopes the deposit is deep. The time evolution of the snow depth, showing the initial erosion and final deposition as the avalanche passed, was also observed at one position using a frequency-modulated continuous wave radar. Measurements at a nearby position gave flow speed profiles and showed that the avalanche tail consists of a steady state subcritical flow that lasts for about 100 s. Eventually, the tail slowly decelerates as the depth slightly decreases, and then it comes to rest. We show that the dependency between the slope angle and the deposition depth can be explained by both a cohesive friction model and the Pouliquen h stop model.

ABSTRACT. We report impact pressures exerted by three wet-snow avalanches on a pylon equipped with piezoelectric load cells. These pressures were considerably higher than those predicted by conventional avalanche engineering guidelines. The time-averaged pressure linearly increased with the immersion depth of the load cells and it was about eight times larger than the hydrostatic snow pressure. At the same immersion depth, the pressures were very similar for all three avalanches and no dependency between avalanche velocity and pressure was apparent. The pressure time series were characterized by large fluctuations. For all immersion depths and for all avalanches, the standard deviations of the fluctuations were, on average, about 20% of the mean value. We compare our observations with results of slow-drag granular experiments, where similar behavior has been explained by formation and destruction of chain structures due to jamming of granular material around the pylon, and we propose the same mechanism as a possible microscale interpretation of our observations.

No abstract

In winter 1998/99, high-frequency pressure measurements with 10 cm sensors mounted 1–19 m above ground were carried out in the upper run-out zone of the avalanche test site at Vallée de la Sionne, Switzerland. Two large dry-snow avalanches clearly revealed a three-layered structure, with surprisingly low pressures in the suspension (or powder-snow) layer. The height of the saltation layer varied between 1 and > 3 m. From the duration, impulse and frequency of single-particle impacts (observed in the saltation layer and intermittently in the dense flow),particle-size and velocity distribution functions as well as strongly varying saltation-layer densities were found. With improved methods for peak detection and correction for grazing impacts, pressure measurements will become premier tool for testing granular flow models.

Observations of the deposits, flow marks, and damages of three mixed-snow avalanches of widely different size were analyzed with regard to flow regimes, velocities, pressures, densities, flow depths, erosion modes, and mass balance. Three deposit types of different density and granulometry could be clearly discerned in these avalanches. They are attributed to dense, fluidized, and suspension flow regimes, respectively. Combining observations, we estimated the density in the fluidized layer as 35–100 kg m − 3 , in good agreement with inferences from pressure measurements. Upper bounds for the suspension layer density, arising from the run-up height, velocity, and damage pattern, are about 5 kg m − 3 at the valley bottom. An approximate momentum balance of the dense layer suggests that the snow cover was eroded to considerable depth, but only partly entrained into the flow proper. The suspension layer had largely lost its erosive power at the point where it separated from the denser parts of the avalanche. Our estimates shed doubt on collisions between snow particles and aerodynamic forces at the head of the avalanche as sole mechanisms for creating and upholding the fluidized layer. We conjecture that the drag from air escaping from the snow cover as it is being compressed by the overriding avalanche could supply the missing lift force.

<p>When planning maintenance and repair actions, the owners of existing structures are often faced with the problem that the structure cannot be verified any more with the current design codes. The expected costs of retrofitting can be significant, which raises the question whether investments are proportionate or whether a lower reliability level can be accepted for a particular structure. The present paper shows how target reliabilities can be defined based on risk and efficiency considerations and how design values for loads and/or resistances can be derived from this design target. The focus is on avalanche loads on protection galleries, for which no standard probabilistic models exist. The derivation of probabilistic load distributions from scenarios and return periods estimated by experts is discussed. The methods are applied to a real structure in the Swiss Alps, illustrating the benefits of the risk-based, probabilistic approach.</p>

&lt;p&gt;Measurements of snow avalanche impact pressures are performed at the Vall&amp;#233;e de la Sionne test site since winter 1999. In these years of operation, we recorded the impact pressure of around 60 avalanches characterized by different flow regimes and dimensions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pressure measurements were performed, simultaneously, on three different structures which are spatially distributed with a maximum distance of 30 m, in the run-out zone of the Vall&amp;#233;e de la Sionne test site. The structure widths range from 0.25 to 1 m. On these structures pressure sensors ranging from small cells with 0.10 to 0.25 m in diameter to large pressure plates with area of 1m&lt;sup&gt;2 &lt;/sup&gt;are mounted at different heights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A systematic analysis of all 60 avalanche data sets shows that the pressure measured at the different obstacles varies considerably, even within the same avalanche, both in space and time. Part of these differences can be attributed to different drag coefficients and dependence on obstacle size, but a large part of these differences can only be explained by the spatial variability of the flow properties and the temporal variability of the physical processes governing the interaction of the avalanche and the structures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this contribution we show how spatial and temporal impact pressure variabilities correlate to avalanche dimension and flow regimes and we discuss the implication of such variations for structural design and hazard mapping.&lt;/p&gt;