A single-laboratory validation (SLV) study was conducted on an LC/MS/MS method for the determination and confirmation of nicarbazin, expressed as 4,4-dinitrocarbanilide (DNC), in chicken tissues, including liver, kidney, muscle, skin with adhering fat, and eggs. Linearity was demonstrated with DNC standard curve solutions using a weighted (1/x) regression and confirmed with matrix-matched standards. Intertrial repeatability precision (relative standard deviation of repeatability; RSD(r) was from 2.5 to 11.3%, as determined in fortified tissues. The precision was verified with incurred tissue, and varied from 0.53 to 2.5%. Average recoveries ranged from 82% in egg to 98% in kidney. Although the average recoveries across all concentrations were within the acceptable range, the method was improved with the inclusion of an internal standard and the use of matrix-matched standards. Accuracy for the improved method in chicken liver varied from 93 to 99% across all concentrations (100-8000 ng/g) compared to recoveries below 80% at concentrations, between 100-400 ng/g in chicken liver for the original method. The limit of detection was estimated to be less than 3.0 ng/g in all tissue types, and the limit of quantitation was validated at 20 ng/g. Based on confirmatory ion ratios and peak retention times, the false-negative rate was estimated as 0.00% (95% confidence limits 0.00, 0.74%) from 484 fortified samples and 12 incurred residue samples analyzed using the U.S. and EU confirmation criteria. Small variations to the method parameters, with the exception of injection volume, did not have a significant effect on recoveries. Stability was determined for fortified tissues, extracts, and standard curve solutions. The data collected in this study satisfy the requirements of SLV studies established by the AOAC Stakeholder Panel for Veterinary Drug Residue and the method was awarded First Action Official Method status by the Expert Review Panel for Veterinary Drug Residues on May 7, 2013.
A liquid chromatographic (LC) assay is described for determining tilmicosin in bovine and porcine blood sera. Tilmicosin is isolated from the serum matrix and purified by solid-phase extraction with C18 sorbent. Sample is analyzed by LC using a gradient system with a phenyl reversed-phase column that separates tilmicosin from the matrix in 30 min. Tilmicosin is measured by UV absorbance at 280 nm. Validation of assay included evaluation of accuracy, precision, linearity, specificity, sensitivity, range, and sample stability. The method has a limit of quantitation of 0.1 ppm and a validated range of 0.1 to 10.0 ppm. Recoveries were 91–95% for bovine serum and 85–93% porcine serum. The limit of detection was 0.05 (μg/mL. Limits of detection and quantitation were based on 3 and 6 times the baseline noise of control serum samples, respectively. Relative standard deviations of precision samples (n = 6) were 2% or less for both sera. The method has better specificity and analysis time than previous microbiological methods for tilmicosin in sera.
A method is described for detection and quantitation of monensin in bovine tissues by liquid chromatography (LC) with postcolumn derivatization (PCD) with vanillin. Monensin is extracted from the tissues by homogenization with methanol–water and is isolated and concentrated by liquid–liquid partition and sorbent extraction with silica gel. Monensin is mixed postcolumn with vanillin under acidic conditions and heated, and the resulting products are measured by a variable-wavelength detector at 520 nm. The method has a limit of quantitation of 5 ppb monensin in milk and 25 ppb monensin in bovine muscle, liver, kidney, and fat. Standard recovery over the levels and matrixes tested ranged from 80 to 88%. The method is an improvement in specificity, accuracy, and analysis time over existing monensin residue methods for bovine tissues.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.