RESULTS. From an estimated 340 residency programs around NYC, recruitment yielded 91 responses, representing 24 specialties and 2306 residents. In 45.1% of programs, at least 1 resident with confirmed COVID-19 was reported. One hundred one resident physicians were confirmed COVID-19-positive, with an additional 163 residents presumed positive for COVID-19 based on symptoms but awaiting or unable to obtain testing. Two COVID-19-positive residents were hospitalized, with 1 in intensive care. Among specialties with more than 100 residents represented, negative binomial regression indicated that infection risk differed by specialty (P = 0.039). In 80% of programs, quarantining a resident was reported. Ninety of 91 programs reported reuse or extended mask use, and 43 programs reported that personal protective equipment (PPE) was suboptimal. Sixty-five programs (74.7%) redeployed residents elsewhere to support COVID-19 efforts. CONCLUSION. Many resident physicians around NYC have been affected by COVID-19 through direct infection, quarantine, or redeployment. Lack of access to testing and concern regarding suboptimal PPE are common among residency programs. Infection risk may differ by specialty.

No abstract

Background From March 2-April 12, 2020, New York City (NYC) experienced exponential growth of the COVID-19 pandemic due to novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Little is known regarding how physicians have been affected. We aimed to characterize COVID-19 impact on NYC resident physicians. Methods IRB-exempt and expedited cross-sectional analysis through survey to NYC residency program directors (PDs) April 3-12, 2020, encompassing events from March 2-April 12, 2020. Findings From an estimated 340 residency programs around NYC, recruitment yielded 91 responses, representing 24 specialties and 2,306 residents. 45.1% of programs reported at least one resident with confirmed COVID-19: 101 resident physicians were confirmed COVID-19-positive, with additional 163 residents presumed positive for COVID-19 based on symptoms but awaiting or unable to obtain testing. 56.5% of programs had a resident waiting for, or unable to obtain, COVID-19 testing. Two COVID-19-positive residents were hospitalized, with one in intensive care. Among specialties with >100 residents represented, negative binomial regression indicated that infection risk differed by specialty (p=0.039). Although most programs (80%) reported quarantining a resident, with 16.8% of residents experiencing quarantine, 14.9% of COVID-19-positive residents were not quarantined. 90 programs, encompassing 99.2% of the resident physicians, reported reuse or extended mask use, and 43 programs, encompassing 60.4% of residents, felt that personal protective equipment (PPE) was suboptimal. 65 programs (74.7%) have redeployed residents elsewhere to support COVID-19 efforts. Interpretation Many resident physicians around NYC have been affected by COVID-19 through direct infection, quarantine, or redeployment. Lack of access to testing and concern regarding suboptimal PPE are common among residency programs. Infection risk may differ by specialty. Funding AHA, MPB, RWSC, CGM, LRDG, and JDH are supported by NEI Core Grant P30EY019007, and unrestricted grant from RPB. ACP and JS are supported by Parker Family Chair. SXX is supported by University of Pennsylvania.

Purpose: To report new multimodal imaging features that enhance our understanding of the inflammatory and ischemic nature of acute idiopathic maculopathy (AIM) and to correlate structural and functional changes due to a reversible initial choroidal ischemia over a clinical course of 3.5 months.Methods: A 31-year-old man presented with acute central vision loss in his right eye due to coxsackievirus-associated AIM. Serial multimodal retinal imaging including confocal true color fundus photography, blue-light fundus autofluorescence (BAF), near-infrared reflectance (NIR), spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept-source optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT + SS-OCT), and en face SS-OCT angiography (SS-OCTA) were performed over a 3.5-month follow-up. Eidon true color confocal scanner camera (Centervue, Padova, Italy) was used for color and BAF imaging. Near-infrared reflectance and SD-OCT images were obtained with the Heidelberg Spectralis OCT (HRA2 + OCT; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). For SS-OCT and en face SS-OCT and SS-OCTA images, the PLEX Elite 9,000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA) was used. Central alterations in choriocapillaris flow were analyzed with SS-OCTA using the University of Washington choriocapillaris (CC) flow deficit quantification algorithm available through the ARI Network. Flow deficit area and density values were analyzed and compared between the first and last examinations. Corresponding en face OCT imaging was used to distinguish true flow defects from artifacts secondary to shadowing.Results: In the acute stage of AIM, a bacillary layer detachment appearing as a yellowgrayish foveal elevation surrounded by a hypopigmented parafoveal ring was evident in a Bull's eye configuration, corresponding to a hyperreflective ring upon NIR and a hyperautofluorescent ring with BAF. SD + SS-OCT showed mostly intraretinal fluid consistent with a bacillary layer detachment in conjunction with a thickened inner choroid. At presentation, SS-OCTA demonstrated a marked reduction of choriocapillaris flow signal. At 1 week, early resolution of retinal fluid was followed by restoration of the ellipsoid zone at 5 weeks, while restoration of the interdigitation zone and reduction in retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch membrane complex thickening occurred more slowly. Swept-source OCT angiography showed a gradual, but incomplete, recovery of inner choroidal flow signal at 3.5-month follow-up.Conclusion: Acutely, AIM may present with a photoreceptor splitting foveal bacillary layer detachment associated with a marked reduction in inner choroidal flow signal on SS-OCTA. Thereafter, restoration of the outer retinal layers and gradual normalization of choroidal flow signal appear to support the often-benign nature of the disease.

(AAO) indicated that urgent or emergent vitreoretinal surgical procedures should continue during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Although decreases in the frequency of critical procedures have been reported outside the field of ophthalmology, analyses are limited by volume, geography, and time. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the frequency of ophthalmic surgical procedures deemed urgent or emergent by the AAO changed across the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Vitreoretinal practices from 17 institutions throughout the US participated in this multicenter cross-sectional study. The frequency of 11 billed vitreoretinal Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes across respective weeks was obtained from each practice between January 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020. Data were clustered into intravitreal injections (code 67028), lasers and cryotherapy (codes 67141, 67145, and 67228), retinal detachment (RD) repairs (codes 67107, 67108, 67110, and 67113), and other vitrectomies (codes 67036, 67039, and 67040). Institutions were categorized by region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West Coast), practice setting (academic [tax-exempt] or private [non-tax-exempt]), and date of respective statewide stay-at-home orders. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Nationwide changes in the frequency of billing for urgent or emergent vitreoretinal surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS A total of 526 536 CPT codes were ascertained: 483 313 injections, 19 257 lasers or cryotherapy, 14 949 RD repairs, and 9017 other vitrectomies. Relative to 2019, a weekly institutional decrease in injections was observed from March 30 to May 2, 2020, with a maximal 38.6% decrease (from a mean [SD] of 437.8 [436.3] to 273.8 [269.0] injections) from April 6 to 12, 2020 (95% CI, −259 to −69 injections; P = .002). A weekly decrease was also identified that spanned a longer interval, at least until study conclusion (March 16 to May 31, 2020), for lasers and cryotherapy, with a maximal 79.6% decrease (from a mean [SD] of 6.6 [7.7] to 1.5 [2.0] procedures) from April 6 to 12, 2020 (95% CI, −6.8 to −3.3 procedures; P < .001), for RD repairs, with a maximal 59.4% decrease (from a mean [SD] of 3.5 [4.0] to 1.6 [2.2] repairs) from April 13 to 19, 2020 (95% CI, −2.7 to −1.4 repairs; P < .001), and for other vitrectomies, with a maximal 84.3% decrease (from a mean [SD] of 3.0 [3.1] to 0.4 [0.8] other vitrectomies) from April 6 to 12, 2020 (95% CI, −3.3 to −1.8 other vitrectomies; P < .001). No differences were identified by region, setting, or state-level stay-at-home order adjustment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although the AAO endorsed the continued performance of urgent or emergent vitreoretinal surgical procedures, the frequency of such procedures throughout the country experienced a substantial decrease that may persist after the COVID-19 pandemic's initial exponential growth phase. This decrease appears independent of region, setting, and state-level stay-at-home orders. It is unknown to what ex...

No abstract

Younger infants may be even more susceptible to damage from vitreomacular traction by rotational and/or acceleration-deceleration forces. Identifying cherry hemorrhages may aid abusive head trauma diagnosis. Survivor abusive head trauma pathology demonstrates unique, irreversible macular and optic nerve damage.

Purpose: To characterize structural and angiographic findings in macular telangiectasia Type 2 (MacTel 2) and examine associations with visual acuity. Methods: MacTel 2 patients with complete ophthalmologic examination, including fundus photography, autofluorescence, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and projection-resolved optical coherence tomography angiography, were retrospectively evaluated. Results: There were 43 eyes of 22 patients with a mean age 63.9 (±10.3) years. Six patients had diabetes. Twenty-one eyes (48.8%) had retinal–choroidal anastomoses (RCAs) without any evidence of neovascularization extending laterally in a plane above or below the retinal pigment epithelium. None of the eyes had hemorrhage, lipid, or signs of subretinal exudation. When present, an average of 55 (±33.7) individual RCAs were clustered primarily in temporal juxtafoveal region of involved eyes. Right-angle veins were seen in all 21 eyes with RCAs, and hyperpigmentation was present in 18 (P < 0.001 for both). A conical collection of hyperreflective material spanning from Bruch membrane past external limiting membrane of ≥200-μm basal diameter was found in 21 eyes and labeled outer retinal hyperreflective lesion. Retinal–choroidal anastomoses occurred in clusters, often within the outer retinal hyperreflective lesion. This lesion colocalized with focal thinning of the outer nuclear layer and was surrounded by a larger defect in the ellipsoid zone. The presence of diabetes (P = 0.015), outer retinal hyperreflective lesion (P = 0.006), RCA (P = 0.005), and ellipsoid zone defect extent (P < 0.001) were associated with decreased visual acuity. Conclusion: Retinal–choroidal anastomoses occur in eyes with MacTel 2 without signs of exudation. Retinal–choroidal anastomoses occur in numerous clusters particularly in the temporal juxtafoveal macula. Diabetes, ellipsoid zone defect extent, RCAs, and the outer retinal hyperreflective lesion predict poorer vision in MacTel 2.