Frequency of Urgent or Emergent Vitreoretinal Surgical Procedures in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

(AAO) indicated that urgent or emergent vitreoretinal surgical procedures should continue during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Although decreases in the frequency of critical procedures have been reported outside the field of ophthalmology, analyses are limited by volume, geography, and time. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the frequency of ophthalmic surgical procedures deemed urgent or emergent by the AAO changed across the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Vitreoretinal practices from 17 institutions throughout the US participated in this multicenter cross-sectional study. The frequency of 11 billed vitreoretinal Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes across respective weeks was obtained from each practice between January 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020. Data were clustered into intravitreal injections (code 67028), lasers and cryotherapy (codes 67141, 67145, and 67228), retinal detachment (RD) repairs (codes 67107, 67108, 67110, and 67113), and other vitrectomies (codes 67036, 67039, and 67040). Institutions were categorized by region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West Coast), practice setting (academic [tax-exempt] or private [non-tax-exempt]), and date of respective statewide stay-at-home orders. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Nationwide changes in the frequency of billing for urgent or emergent vitreoretinal surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS A total of 526 536 CPT codes were ascertained: 483 313 injections, 19 257 lasers or cryotherapy, 14 949 RD repairs, and 9017 other vitrectomies. Relative to 2019, a weekly institutional decrease in injections was observed from March 30 to May 2, 2020, with a maximal 38.6% decrease (from a mean [SD] of 437.8 [436.3] to 273.8 [269.0] injections) from April 6 to 12, 2020 (95% CI, −259 to −69 injections; P = .002). A weekly decrease was also identified that spanned a longer interval, at least until study conclusion (March 16 to May 31, 2020), for lasers and cryotherapy, with a maximal 79.6% decrease (from a mean [SD] of 6.6 [7.7] to 1.5 [2.0] procedures) from April 6 to 12, 2020 (95% CI, −6.8 to −3.3 procedures; P < .001), for RD repairs, with a maximal 59.4% decrease (from a mean [SD] of 3.5 [4.0] to 1.6 [2.2] repairs) from April 13 to 19, 2020 (95% CI, −2.7 to −1.4 repairs; P < .001), and for other vitrectomies, with a maximal 84.3% decrease (from a mean [SD] of 3.0 [3.1] to 0.4 [0.8] other vitrectomies) from April 6 to 12, 2020 (95% CI, −3.3 to −1.8 other vitrectomies; P < .001). No differences were identified by region, setting, or state-level stay-at-home order adjustment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although the AAO endorsed the continued performance of urgent or emergent vitreoretinal surgical procedures, the frequency of such procedures throughout the country experienced a substantial decrease that may persist after the COVID-19 pandemic's initial exponential growth phase. This decrease appears independent of region, setting, and state-level stay-at-home orders. It is unknown to what ex...

The Impact of COVID-19 on Diabetic Retinopathy Monitoring and Treatment

“…More rigorous studies on a population level are needed to fully evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on DR-related outcomes and whether the associated negative outcomes are permanent. Moreover, a multicenter analysis of pandemic-associated changes in retinal procedures and surgeries demonstrated a decrease in the number of laser procedures, vitrectomies for retinal detachment repair, and vitrectomies for other indications [20]. Further work will be needed to determine the impact of the pandemic on PDR-specific laser procedures and vitrectomies.…”

“…In a multicenter cross-sectional study across 17 institutions in the USA, billing data for vitreoretinal procedures from January 1, 2019 and May 21, 2020 were queried, yielding an aggregate of 526,536 procedures [20]. The average weekly intravitreal injections per institution for all indications were significantly lower in April 2020 compared to April 2019.…”

Vitreoretinal surgery amid coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic restrictions

“…They also reported that important decrease in the numbers of vitreoretinal surgeries although the American Academia of Ophthalmology endorsed the continued performance of emergent/urgent vitreoretinal surgical procedures. 11 In this study, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was the most common indication for vitreoretinal surgeries with a rate of 55.7% amid COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in Turkey and followed by diabetic retinal complications. Silicon oil-related complications, crystalline lens/intraocular lens drop, and endophthalmitis were the other indications for vitreoretinal surgery.…”

“…Breazzano et al 11 reported that retinal detachment repair was a more common vitreoretinal surgery indication amid the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA when compared with the other vitreoretinal surgery indications. They also reported that important decrease in the numbers of vitreoretinal surgeries although the American Academia of Ophthalmology endorsed the continued performance of emergent/urgent vitreoretinal surgical procedures.…”

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on surgical procedures for retinal detachment in France: a national database study

“… 22 In a recent large US nationwide study, Breazzano et al reported similar results, with a decrease in the rate of ophthalmological procedures as much as 84.3% for some vitrectomies. 23 These authors found that this trend did not concern vitreoretinal surgery activity only but also intravitreal injection activity, which showed a 38.6% decrease. A recent nationwide study reported a 47.1% decrease during the first 5 weeks of France’s lockdown period.…”