The fundamental attribution error (FAE) was conceptualized in terms of implicit beliefs linking dispositions to features of constrained action. Essays, positionally congruent with their writer's attitude, were judged (by writers and observers) to be stronger, easier to write, and more likely to evoke a correspondent attribution than were incongruent essays. Additional evidence suggested that these judgments reflected a bias directed at confirming expectations generated by the specified attitude. The reverse of this process-inferring an attitude on the basis of an essay featurewas examined using a contrast-effect procedure to induce the perception of identical essays as strong or weak. The resulting FAE was exaggerated in the strong-but completely attenuated in the weak-essay condition. The results clarify the basis for viewing constrained behavior as having diagnostic value.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.