We report on the use of several proximal tubular cell (PTC) surface markets and corresponding antibodies in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and their ability to identify and flow sort cells of defined proximal tubular origin (S1S2S3) or of defined proximal subsegmental origin (S1S2 only/S3 only). We tested monoclonal/polyclonal antibodies directed against five different surface peptidases [leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (NEP), dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV), aminopeptidase A (APA) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (gamma-GT)], the S3 segment-specific marker intestinal type alkaline phosphatase (iAP) and an S1S2 marker (TN20-antigen), originally proposed as a surface marker for interstitial fibroblasts. Segmental (proximal tubular vs. distal tubular) and proximal subsegmental (S1S2 vs. S3) expression of all five surface peptidases and TN20 antigen were first assessed by comparing immunohistochemical staining on normal human kidney tissue with staining for well-known segment-specific differentiation markers (intestinal type alkaline phosphatase, Tamm-Horsfall protein) on adjacent sections. All five peptidases were found to be expressed to a certain degree in all subsegments (S1 S2 and S3) of the proximal nephron, whereas expression was never seen in the more distal parts of the nephron. Flow cytometry was performed on cells obtained following gradient purification of collagenase-digested human renal tissue. Labeling cells for expression of LAP, NEP or DPPIV resulted in high yields of specifically labeled PTC (S1S2S3 origin). Labeling with anti-LAP resulted in the clearest distinction between positive and negative cell subpopulations, and therefore LAP was considered the best PTC marker for use in FACS. iAP histochemical staining on sorted cells showed that flow sorting with monoclonal antibody (moAb) 250 (anti-intestinal type alkaline phosphatase) allowed sorting of S3 cells with > 90% purity. Likewise, moAb TN20 enabled us to obtain a highly purified S1S2 population as confirmed by the absence of iAP on sorted cells.

Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation is a determinant risk factor for the functional and morphologic outcome of cadaveric renal allografts at 1 1/2 years.

Our study presents a procedure for isolating and culturing pure populations of human DT cells and CD system cells as separate populations, using antibodies to the best available markers in FACS.

In the present article, we show that flow cytometric immunodissection of cells immediately following their preparation from a tumor nephrectomy specimen is an accurate way of obtaining pure human primary cultures of proximal convoluted tubule origin, proximal straight tubule origin, distal tubular origin and/or collecting duct origin. By studying the expression of a panel of cell surface markers in these purified cultures, we could identify a number of markers that retain their lineage specificity in vitro. Using these appropriate stable markers, flow cytometry provides a simple yet accurate way of determining cell composition in previously unsorted (mixed type) tubular epithelial cultures in terms of proximal versus distal tubule/collecting duct subpopulations. Both subpopulations in mixed type cultures are shown to retain functional characteristics of their in vivo counterparts (glucose uptake, hormonal stimulation of adenylate cyclase) as well as cell type-specific response patterns (such as inducibility of cell adhesion and histocompatibility molecules), indicating the usefulness of studying cell responses in vitro in a cell-type-dependent way. Finally we illustrate that multi-parameter flow cytometry is a powerful tool for assessing constitutive characteristics of and/or responses by the distinct cell subpopulations present in mixed type cultures.

Background Kidney biopsy registries all over the world benefit research, teaching and health policy. Comparison, aggregation and exchange of data is however greatly dependent on how registration and coding of kidney biopsy diagnoses are performed. This paper gives an overview over kidney biopsy registries, explores how these registries code kidney disease and identifies needs for improvement of coding practice. Methods A literature search was undertaken to identify biopsy registries for medical kidney diseases. These data were supplemented with information from personal contacts and from registry websites. A questionnaire was sent to all identified registries, investigating age of registries, scope, method of coding, possible mapping to international terminologies as well as self-reported problems and suggestions for improvement. Results Sixteen regional or national kidney biopsy registries were identified, of which 11 were older than 10 years. Most registries were located either in Europe (10/16) or in Asia (4/16). Registries most often use a proprietary coding system (12/16). Only a few of these coding systems were mapped to SNOMED CT (1), older SNOMED versions (2) or ERA-EDTA PRD (3). Lack of maintenance and updates of the coding system was the most commonly reported problem. Conclusions There were large gaps in the global coverage of kidney biopsy registries. Limited use of international coding systems among existing registries hampers interoperability and exchange of data. The study underlines that the use of a common and uniform coding system is necessary to fully realize the potential of kidney biopsy registries.