The incidence of clinically significant complications after protocol biopsy of a stable renal transplant is low. Direct benefits to the patients concerned (irrespective of the benefit that may accrue in clinical trials) were not formally assessed but seem likely to outweigh the risk of the procedure. We believe that it is ethically justifiable to ask renal transplant recipients to undergo protocol biopsies in clinical trials and routine care.

C4d staining of renal allografts is regarded as an in situ marker of active humoral rejection. Few data are available about the incidence of C4d deposition in protocol biopsies compared to indication biopsies. To evaluate whether center-specific factors influence the incidence of C4d detection, we performed a multicenter study. From three European centers, 551 protocol and 377 indication biopsies were reclassified according to the updated Banff criteria and stained for C4d. C4d results were recorded as diffuse or focal positive and statistically correlated to clinical parameters, morphology and graft survival. In the protocol biopsies, a diffuse C4d stain was found in 2.0%, and a focal stain in 2.4%. In indication biopsies, 12.2% were diffusely and 8.5% focally C4d positive (protocol:indication p < 0.0001). The incidence of C4d deposition varied significantly between centers, attributable to variable numbers of presensitized patients with more C4d positive indication and protocol biopsies. Diffuse and focal C4d stain correlated with morphology of humoral rejection in protocol as well as in indication biopsies. Protocol biopsies show a significantly lower incidence of C4d deposition than indication biopsies. Subclinical C4d detection in protocol biopsies had no significant impact on allograft survival in our series.

No abstract

Background After transplantation, cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) derived from the donor organ (ddcfDNA) can be detected in the recipient’s circulation. We aimed to investigate the role of plasma ddcfDNA as biomarker for acute kidney rejection. Methods From 107 kidney transplant recipients, plasma samples were collected longitudinally after transplantation (Day 1 to 3 months) within a multicentre set-up. Cell-free DNA from the donor was quantified in plasma as a fraction of the total cell-free DNA by next generation sequencing using a targeted, multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based method for the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Results Increases of the ddcfDNA% above a threshold value of 0.88% were significantly associated with the occurrence of episodes of acute rejection (P = 0.017), acute tubular necrosis (P = 0.011) and acute pyelonephritis (P = 0.032). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an equal area under the curve of the ddcfDNA% and serum creatinine of 0.64 for the diagnosis of acute rejection. Conclusions Although increases in plasma ddcfDNA% are associated with graft injury, plasma ddcfDNA does not outperform the diagnostic capacity of the serum creatinine in the diagnosis of acute rejection.

BackgroundAfter transplantation, cell-free DNA derived from the donor organ (ddcfDNA) can be detected in the recipient’s circulation. We aimed to quantify ddcfDNA levels in plasma of kidney transplant recipients thereby investigating the kinetics of this biomarker after transplantation and determining biological variables that influence ddcfDNA kinetics in stable and non-stable patients.Materials and methodsFrom 107 kidney transplant recipients, plasma samples were collected longitudinally after transplantation (day 1–3 months) within a multicenter set-up. Cell-free DNA from the donor was quantified in plasma as a fraction of the total cell-free DNA by next generation sequencing using a targeted, multiplex PCR-based method for the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. A subgroup of stable renal transplant recipients was identified to determine a ddcfDNA threshold value.ResultsIn stable transplant recipients, plasma ddcfDNA% decreased to a mean (SD) ddcfDNA% of 0.46% (± 0.21%) which was reached 9.85 (± 5.6) days after transplantation. A ddcfDNA threshold value of 0.88% (mean + 2SD) was determined in kidney transplant recipients. Recipients that did not reach this threshold ddcfDNA value within 10 days after transplantation showed a higher ddcfDNA% on the first day after transplantation and demonstrated a higher individual baseline ddcfDNA%.ConclusionIn conclusion, plasma ddcfDNA fractions decreased exponentially within 10 days after transplantation to a ddcfDNA threshold value of 0.88% or less. To investigate the role of ddcfDNA for rejection monitoring of the graft, future research is needed to determine causes of ddcfDNA% increases above this threshold value.

Use of the developed multiple linear regression equation and Bayesian estimator, both based on only three blood sampling times within 2 hours following a dose of mycophenolate mofetil, allowed an accurate prediction of a patient's MPA AUC(12) for therapeutic drug monitoring and dose individualization. These findings should be validated in a randomized prospective trial.

Summary Large‐scale clinical trials using C2 monitoring of cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion (Neoral) in renal transplant recipients have demonstrated low acute rejection rates and good tolerability with a low adverse event profile in a variety of settings: with or without routine induction therapy; in combination with mycophenolate mofetil; with standard‐exposure or low‐exposure Neoral; and in patients with immediate or delayed graft function. In liver transplantation, C2 monitoring significantly reduces the severity and incidence of acute rejection compared with C0 monitoring, without adverse consequences in terms of renal function or tolerability. Different C2 targets are appropriate depending on adjunctive immune suppression, level of immunologic risk, CsA tolerability, risk of renal toxicity and time since transplantation. CsA absorption may increase substantially in most patients during the first 1–2 weeks post‐transplant, and this should be taken into account to avoid overshooting C2 target range. A patient with a low C2 value may be either a low or a delayed absorber of CsA, or be a normal absorber who is receiving too low a dose of Neoral. C2 monitoring alone is insufficient to differentiate between these types of patients, and measurement of additional timepoints is recommended. Adopting C2 monitoring in maintenance transplant patients identifies those who are overexposed to CsA. In summary, randomized, prospective, multicenter studies and single‐center trials have evaluated Neoral C2 monitoring within a range of regimens in different organ types, providing a robust evidence base for the benefits of this sensitive monitoring technique.

Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation is a determinant risk factor for the functional and morphologic outcome of cadaveric renal allografts at 1 1/2 years.