BackgroundThis pilot study conducted at the Peninsula Medical School is one of very few studies to compare the use of video podcasts to traditional learning resources for medical students.MethodsWe developed written handouts and video podcasts for three common ear, nose, and throat conditions; epistaxis, otitis media, and tonsillitis. Forty-one second-year students were recruited via email. Students completed a 60-item true or false statement test written by the senior author (20 questions per subject). Students were subsequently randomized to podcast or handouts. Students were able to access their resource via their unique university login on the university homepage and were given 3 weeks to use their resource. They then completed the same 60-item test.ResultsBoth podcasts and handouts demonstrated a statistically significant increase in student scores (podcasts mean increase in scores 4.7, P=0.004, 95% confidence interval =0.07). Handout mean increase in scores 5.3, P=0.015, 95% confidence interval =0.11). However, there was no significant difference (P=0.07) between the two, with the handout group scoring fractionally higher (podcasts average post-exposure score =37.3 vs handout 37.8) with a larger average improvement. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire demonstrated that medical students enjoy using reusable learning objects such as podcasts and feel that they should be used more in their curriculum.ConclusionPodcasts are as good as traditional handouts in teaching second-year medical students three core ear, nose, and throat conditions and enhance their learning experience.
We describe the novel use of the TriTube â and Evone â ventilator (Ventinova, Eindhoven, Netherlands) to facilitate curative resection of a transglottic squamous cell carcinoma. A 43-year-old man presented with acute laryngeal and subglottic airway obstruction secondary to a stage 4 transglottic squamous cell carcinoma. The patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging followed by a diagnostic panendoscopy. It was decided that tumour resection was appropriate and a management plan was established by a multi disciplinary team. A total laryngectomy was performed. It was determined that failure of translaryngeal tracheal intubation could be rescued with emergency surgical front-of-neck airway. General anaesthesia was induced using a total intravenous anaesthesia technique, oxygenation was achieved with high-flow nasal oxygen and the airway was secured using the TriTube and flow-controlled ventilation was delivered throughout the procedure using the Evone ventilator. This avoided an awake or emergency tracheostomy, with the associated theoretical risk of tumour seeding, allowed for excellent gas exchange throughout and permitted the surgeons to maintain a closed system during much of the procedure, including during fashioning of the stoma. When traditional laryngectomy tubes are used, this process ordinarily involves multiple extubations and apnoeic periods. Furthermore, the small subglottic tube allowed intra-operative assessment of the extent of the subglottic tumour, facilitating curative en bloc resection.
Purpose To establish if day case superficial parotidectomy is feasible, safe and does not result in excess readmissions. Method A retrospective review was carried out of all patients listed for superficial parotidectomy with day case intent by a single surgeon between January 2016 and December 2019 inclusively. The reasons for failure of same day discharge were established. Postoperative complications and readmissions were recorded. Our approach for a superficial parotidectomy typically includes the use of a 10Fr suction drain which is removed at 4 h postoperatively if the output is less than 30 ml. Results Ninety-one consecutive superficial parotidectomies listed for day case surgery were eligible for inclusion. Seventeen patients failed to be discharged on the same day and were admitted giving a day case success rate of 81%. Most of these ( n = 9) occurred in the first year of adopting day case surgery. The most common reason to admit patients was a late finish ( n = 8, 47%). Six patients (25%) were admitted due to anaesthetic complications. One patient had a surgical complication requiring admission. Conclusion Our series demonstrates that day case superficial parotidectomy using a surgical drain is feasible, safe and does not result in an unacceptable readmission rate. In our experience, surgical complications are an uncommon cause for day case failure. The most common cause for day case failure was a late finish. Postoperative complications including bleeding, seroma/salivary collection and facial nerve palsy were in keeping with or better than those quoted in the literature.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.