No abstract

The particle fabrication technique PRINT® was used to fabricate monodisperse size and shape specific poly(lactide-co-glycolide) particles loaded with the chemotherapeutic Docetaxel. The pharmacokinetics of two cylindrical shaped particles with diameter=80nm; height=320nm (PRINT-Doc-80×320) and d=200nm; h=200nm (PRINT-Doc-200×200) were compared to Docetaxel in mice bearing human ovarian carcinoma SKOV-3 flank xenografts. The Docetaxel plasma exposure was ~20-fold higher for both particles compared to docetaxel. Additionally, the volume of distribution (Vd) of Docetaxel in PRINT formulations was ~18-fold (PRINT-Doc-80×320) and ~33-fold (PRINT-Doc-200×200) lower than Docetaxel. The prolonged duration of Docetaxel in plasma when dosed with PRINT formulations subsequently lead to increased tumor exposure of Docetaxel from 0-168 hours (~53% higher for PRINT-Doc-80×320 and ~76% higher for PRINT-Doc-200×200 particles). PRINT-Doc-80×320 had lower exposures in the liver, spleen and lung compared with PRINT-Doc-200×200. Thus, the use of particles with smaller feature size may be preferred to decrease clearance by organs of the mononuclear phagocyte system.

Purpose A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of liposomal and small molecule (SM) anticancer agents. Methods Inter-patient PK variability of 9 liposomal and SM formulations of the same drug were evaluated. PK variability was measured as coefficient of variance (CV%) of area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and the fold-difference between AUCmax and AUCmin (AUC range). Results CV% of AUC and AUC ranges were 2.7-fold (P<0.001) and 16.7-fold (P=0.13) greater, respectively, for liposomal compared with SM drugs. There was an inverse linear relationship between the clearance (CL) of liposomal agents and PK variability with a lower CL associated with greater PK variability (R2 = 0.39). PK variability of liposomal agents was greater when evaluated from 0–336 h compared with 0–24 h. Conclusion PK variability of liposomes is significantly greater than SM. The factors associated with the PK variability of liposomal agents needs to be evaluated.

Purpose: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tissue disposition of macromolecular camptothecin (CPT) drug conjugate, XMT-1001, and irinotecan (CPT-11) in mice bearing HT-29 xenograft tumors. Experimental Design: The antitumor efficacy of XMT-1001 was evaluated in the mouse HT-29 human colon carcinoma xenograft model. XMT-1001 was administered intravenously to female athymic nude (nu/nu) mice bearing established HT-29 xenograft tumors (n = 10) at 15, 30, and 60 mg CPT equivalents/kg on weekly or biweekly schedules. The tumor growth inhibition and tumor growth delay endpoints were used for efficacy evaluation. In the pharmacokinetic study, XMT-1001 was administered intravenously at a pharmacologically relevant dose of 60 mg CPT equivalents/kg × 1 via tail vein or an equimolar dose of CPT-11 at 100 mg/kg i.p. × 1. Mice (n = 3 per time point) were euthanized from 0.083 to 336 hours after XMT-1001 administration and from 0.083 to 24 hours after CPT-11. Plasma, tumor, and tissues were collected from all animals. A liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry assay was used to measure XMT-1001, conjugate release products, CPT-20-O-(N-succinimido-glycinate; CPT-SI) and CPT-20-O-(N-succinamidoyl-glycinate; CPT-SA), and CPT. Results: After XMT-1001 administration, the majority of the plasma exposure is accounted for by conjugated CPT. XMT-1001 exhibited a prolonged exposure of conjugated drug, active conjugate primary release products, CPT-SI and CPT-SA, and active CPT, which was associated with greater antitumor response compared with CPT-11. Conclusions: XMT-1001 provides an extended systemic and tumor exposure of conjugated drug and shows improved antitumor effect compared with CPT-11. Clin Cancer Res; 18(9); 2591–602. ©2012 AACR.

TSC is a phenotypic probe for PLD pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and may be used to individualize PLD therapy in ovarian cancer and for other nanoparticles in development.

No abstract

Background: Carrier-mediated agents (CMA) are classified as nanoparticles, nanosomes (nanoparticle sized liposomes) and conjugates. Anticancer CMA offer many unique advantages over their traditional small molecule (SM) counterparts, including improved solubility, longer duration of exposure, tumor-selective delivery, increased antitumor response and reduced toxicity. The interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) associated with nanoparticles are greater than that observed with SM. The starting dose for phase I studies of SM and CMA anticancer agents is based on the toxicity profile of the most sensitive species (e.g. rat or canine). However, the optimal animal model for toxicologic and pharmacologic studies of CMA is unclear. Our preliminary data suggests that dogs are highly sensitive to nanoparticles and thus may not be an appropriate animal model in determining the starting dose of CMA for phase I clinical trials. We evaluated preclinical toxicology data and how this affected the design and progression of phase I studies of CMA compared to SM anticancer agents. Methods: In preclinical studies, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in rats and dogs was evaluated for CMA and their respective SM. In phase I clinical trials of CMA and their respective SM in patients with advanced solid tumors, the basis for starting dose, the number of dose escalations, number of patients and the ratio of MTD to starting dose was determined. Results: Starting dose in phase I studies of CMA was based on dogs. Conclusions: The degree of dose escalation from starting dose to MTD was significantly greater for CMA compared to SM drugs. This was also associated with a significantly greater number of dose levels, patients, and time required to complete phase I studies of CMA compared to SM. These findings necessitate the need to identify the most appropriate preclinical animal model to use to evaluate CMA toxicity in phase I studies. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 371. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-371

Introduction: Liposomal formulations offer advantages over small molecules including increased solubility, selective targeting potential and prolonged drug exposure. Compared with conventional formulations, these agents often have greater PK and pharmacodynamic variability, which is attributed to the role of the mononuclear phagocyte system in the clearance of liposomes. Inter-patient variability in drug exposure, represented by area under the curve (AUC), of encapsulated drug can be 20- to 100-fold. However, some nanoparticle and liposomal agents report lower inter-patient PK variability. Study design and sampling schema may affect the documentation of PK variability, due to the prolonged systemic exposure of encapsulated drug. Thus, we evaluated the reported PK variability of PEGylated CKD-602 (S-CKD602) and non-liposomal CKD-602 (NL-CKD-602) using a short (0-24 h) and long (0-336 h) sampling schema. Methods: S-CKD602 and NL-CKD-602 were administered at doses ranging from 0.5 to 2.1 mg/m2 in phase I studies of patients with advanced solid tumors. Blood samples were obtained from baseline to 336 h for S-CKD602 and from baseline to 24 h for NL-CKD-602. Plasma concentration of total (lactone + hydroxy acid) encapsulated CKD-602 from S-CKD602 and total CKD-602 from NL-CKD-602 were measured by LC-MS/MS. AUC from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) and 0 to 336 h (AUC0-336) were calculated. The coefficient of variance % (CV%) in AUC0-24 and AUC0-336 at each dose level were calculated for S-CKD602 and NL-CKD-602. Results: Conclusion: The inter-patient variability of exposure of S-CKD602 is 2.5- to 3.4-fold greater than that of NL- CKD-602. Current PK study designs limited to 24 h underestimate the inter-patient variability of exposure of S-CKD602. PK study design of liposomal agents requires an extended PK sampling schema to accurately describe its PK disposition. A limited sampling strategy that may be applied for all nanoparticles is under development to address this issue. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1295. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1295