Most studies on corporate branding and image have focused on the influence of external com

Employees ' deep identification with an organization ' s identity has been shown toenhance commitment to the organization, jobrelated motivation and satisfaction, and organization-relevant citizenship behavior. Nonetheless, few studies have looked at how corporate identity influences -or is influenced by -employee participation in corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs. This qualitative, exploratory study examines this relationship by looking at DHL Asia-Pacific employees ' participation in the company ' s disaster response to the 2004 Asian tsunami. It shows that employee ' s participation in the disaster-response program -one of the pillars of DHL ' s CSR strategy -simultaneously feeds off and reinforces their experience of corporate identity. Over time, the interactions between participation in CSR and corporate identity form a self-reinforcing loop. The paper notes that close alignment between CSR strategy and corporate identity and internal communication are critical to the success of CSR programs. It concludes by noting the study ' s limitations and offering suggestions for future research.

This study explores the implications of the digital network society for public health communication and management through an empirical study on communication related to the transboundary haze crisis in Singapore. Using the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF), the authors applied sentiment and thematic analysis on haze-related posts on an online discussion forum (HardwareZone) and a social networking site (Facebook), and to haze-related articles in The Straits Times (a newspaper). The study shows that the medium matters in social amplification of risk: Facebook had an effect on the amplification of emotions, while HardwareZone and The Straits Times did not. In addition, the results show that spikes in online risk amplification were strongly influenced by unprecedented events. They also suggest that anger expressed online may be linked to a sense of futility. Implications for practice and recommendations for future research are provided in the conclusion.

No abstract

What creates corporate reputations and how should organizations respond? Corporate reputation is a growing research field in disciplines as diverse as communication, management, marketing, industrial and organizational psychology, and sociology. As a formal area of academic study, it is relatively young with roots in the 1980s and the emergence of specialized reputation rankings for industries, products/services, and performance dimensions and for regions. Such rankings resulted in competition between organizations and the alignment of organizational activities to qualify and improve standings in the rankings. In addition, today's changing stakeholder expectations, the growth of advocacy, demand for more disclosures and greater transparency, and globalized, mediatized environments create new challenges, pitfalls, and opportunities for organizations. Successfully engaging, dealing with, and working through reputational challenges requires an understanding of options and tools for organizational decision-making and stakeholder engagement.

Several researchers-most notably Lennart Sjoberg and his colleagues-have proposed that the moral aspects of risk provide a better explanation of risk perception than the psychometric paradigm or Cultural Theory, neither of which accounts for moral concerns. This study is possibly the first to assess empirically the perception of the risks and benefits of a transgenic food crop-transgenic Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) eggplant-by farmers in a developing country such as India. It also aims to assess if the moral aspects of risk figure in Indian farmers' perception of Bt eggplant and if economic benefits outweigh perceived risks. To answer the research questions, a scenario was used to elicit perceptions of Bt eggplant among 100 eggplant farmers in the state of Maharashtra in India. The findings indicate that economic benefits, safety concerns, and accountability are most salient to Indian farmers' perception of the risks and benefits of Bt eggplant. Significantly, none of the farmers mentioned moral concerns as an issue. The findings also make clear that economic benefits outweigh perceived risks. This study concludes that economic benefits are more salient than moral concerns to Indian farmers' perception Bt eggplant. It also proposes that an alternative theoretical model incorporating economic benefits, safety concerns, and accountability as key variables should be developed and tested for end users in the developing world.

No abstract

No abstract