No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

These recommendations from the ISSHP are based upon available literature and expert opinion. It is intended that this be a 'living' document, to be updated when needed as more research becomes available to influence good clinical practice. Unfortunately there is a relative lack of high quality randomised trials in the field of Hypertension in Pregnancy compared with studies in essential hypertension outside of pregnancy and ISSHP encourages greater funding and uptake of collaborative research in this field. Accordingly, the quality of evidence for the recommendations in this document has not been graded, though relevant references and explanations are provided for each recommendation. The document will be a 'living' guideline and we hope to be able to grade recommendations in the future.Guidelines and recommendations for management of hypertension in pregnancy are typically written for implementation in an ideal setting. It is acknowledged that in many parts of the world, it will not be possible to adopt all of these recommendations; for this reason, options for management in less-resourced settings are discussed separately in relation to diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. This document has been endorsed by the International Society of Obstetric Medicine (ISOM) and the Japanese Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (JSSHP). 5 KEY POINTS: All units managing hypertensive pregnant women should maintain and review uniform departmental management protocols and conduct regular audits of maternal & fetal outcomes.The cause(s) of pre-eclampsia and the optimal clinical management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy remain uncertain; therefore, we recommend that every hypertensive pregnant woman be offered an opportunity to participate in research, clinical trials and follow-up studies. Classification1. Hypertension in pregnancy may be chronic (pre-dating pregnancy or diagnosed before 20 weeks of pregnancy) or de novo (either pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension).2. Chronic hypertension is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes and is best managed by tightly controlling maternal blood pressure (BP 110-140/85 mmHg), monitoring fetal growth and repeatedly assessing for the development of pre-eclampsia and maternal complications. This can be done in an outpatient setting.3. White-coat hypertension refers to elevated office/ clinic (≥140/90mmHg) blood pressure but normal blood pressure measured at home or work (<135/85mmHg); it is not an entirely benign condition and conveys an increased risk for pre-eclampsia. 6 4. Masked hypertension is another form of hypertension, more difficult to diagnose, characterised by blood pressure that is normal at a clinic or office visit but elevated at other times, most typically diagnosed by 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) or automated home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). 5.Gestational hypertension is hypertension arising de novo after 20 weeks' gestation in the absence of proteinuria and without biochemical or haematological abnormalities. It...

Background and objectives Survival, symptom burden, and quality of life (QOL) are uncertain for elderly patients with advanced CKD managed without dialysis. We examined these outcomes in patients managed with renal supportive care without dialysis (RSC-NFD) and those planned for or commencing dialysis.Design, setting, participants, & measurements In this prospective observational study, symptoms were measured using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale and the Palliative care Outcomes Scale -Symptoms (renal) inventory and QOL was measured using the Short Form-36 survey. This study comprised 273 predialysis patients who had usual nephrology care and 122 nondialysis pathway patients who also attended a renal supportive care clinic adding the skills of a palliative medicine team. A further 72 patients commenced dialysis during this period without attending either clinic.Results Nondialysis patients were older than the predialysis group (82 versus 67 years; P,0.001) but had similar eGFR at the first clinic visit (16 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; P=0.92). Of the predialysis patients, 92 (34%) commenced dialysis. Compared with the RSC-NFD group, the death rate was lower in the predialysis group who did not require dialysis (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.41] and in those requiring dialysis (0.30; 0.13 to 0.67) but not in dialysis patients who had not attended the predialysis clinic (0.60; 0.35 to 1.03). Median survival in RSC-NFD patients was 16 (interquartile range, 9, 37) months and 32% survived .12 months after eGFR fell below 10 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . For the whole group, age, serum albumin, and eGFR ,15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 were associated with poorer survival. Of the nondialysis patients, 57% had stable or improved symptoms over 12 months and 58% had stable or improved QOL.Conclusions Elderly patients who choose not to have dialysis as part of shared decision making survive a median of 16 months and about one-third survive 12 months past a time when dialysis might have otherwise been indicated. Utilizing the skills of palliative medicine helps provide reasonable symptom control and QOL without dialysis.

No abstract

No abstract