2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,476
1
58

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,231 publications
(1,545 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
10
1,476
1
58
Order By: Relevance
“…systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg) is a common problem, complicating nearly 10% of pregnancies . The spectrum of HDP is categorized as follows: chronic hypertension (elevated blood pressure before 20 weeks of pregnancy or persisting beyond 12 weeks after birth); gestational hypertension (new‐onset hypertension at or beyond 20 weeks of pregnancy); pre‐eclampsia (gestational hypertension coupled with proteinuria and/or end‐organ dysfunction); superimposed pre‐eclampsia with chronic hypertension …”
Section: Placental Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg) is a common problem, complicating nearly 10% of pregnancies . The spectrum of HDP is categorized as follows: chronic hypertension (elevated blood pressure before 20 weeks of pregnancy or persisting beyond 12 weeks after birth); gestational hypertension (new‐onset hypertension at or beyond 20 weeks of pregnancy); pre‐eclampsia (gestational hypertension coupled with proteinuria and/or end‐organ dysfunction); superimposed pre‐eclampsia with chronic hypertension …”
Section: Placental Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, preeclampsia may present with or without severe features (Brown et al, 2018). However, preeclampsia may present with or without severe features (Brown et al, 2018).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still controversy with some studies concluding that, on the contrary, it is not a proper diagnostic test, because of poor sensitivity and specificity or poor correlation with the 24HP due to the variety of results of the PCR over a 24‐hour period . Other studies determined that a PCR can be used but only as a “rule‐out” test (as the AUC is too low when comparing the PCR to the 24HP) or to assess the magnitude of proteinuria, especially in severe pre‐eclampsia, even if the rate of the PCR does not seem to be predictive of adverse pregnancy outcome …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%