Abstract:The paper presents complex analyses of geophysical site investigation results. The electrical resistivity method was used to investigate the potential pollutant migration pathways within areas of existing and former landfill sites. For the purpose of the present study, there were four municipal waste landfills and one industrial landfill chosen for further comprehensive analyses. The landfill bottom was isolated using geomembrane liner. However, ground water monitoring results revealed that the base was not leakage-free. Another two landfills were established in the past, when no containment systems were legally required. The geoelectrical investigation was the final part of an overall analytical assessment of the contaminated sites. The study was aimed at pollution spatial migration analyses and the interpretation of results, for further design of the reclamation and restoration plans. A clear correlation between pollution indicators such as salt compounds and electrical resistivity, allow aerial analyses and the precise determination of contaminated zones. The research results presented in the paper have been recently obtained and concern a period from 2010 to 2015.
Nowoursynowska 159, Abstract. Soil electrical conductivity measurements are uniquely useful for environmental impact assessment. Both surface and downhole methods may be used to monitor groundwater and soil quality. This paper presents a site investigation that was conducted to characterize soil and groundwater quality in the Imielin countryside in Poland, where traditional and precision farming have been applied. Two methods for estimating the salinity of soils were used: electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and the EC-Probe for direct measurement of ground salinity. Based on electrical conductivity measurements, several maps of electrical conductivity zones were produced to assess groundwater and soil quality on agricultural land. Moreover, the empirical relationship between total dissolved solids (TDS) in water vs. soil electrical conductivity (EC), moisture and fine particle content was obtained. The two different techniques that were used in this study to measure the electrical conductivity of soil showed comparable test results and demonstrated that the investigated area is not contaminated.
Standard test methods may not be suitable or sufficient for determining the geotechnical conditions of a structure’s subsoil and the effects of the designed structures on the environment. Geophysical test methods, validated with other methods, may prove useful. In recent years they have found many new applications in engineering practice, both geotechnical and environmental. The advantages of geophysical methods include the non-destructive and non-invasive nature of the tests, their low costs and quick results, as well as compatibility with different materials, including soils, solid rocks, wastes and anthropogenic formations. The paper presents the analysis of laboratory and field investigations including research in a modified oedometer, resistivity chamber, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and resistivity cone penetration test (RCPT). Laboratory tests allowed for the assessment of the degree of saturation and porosity of sandy and clayey soils. The tests were carried out on saturated and unsaturated soil samples and allowed for the determination of some relationships between electrical conductivity and porosity. The proposed equations were used to assess parameters in in situ studies using RCPT tests and showed good agreement with reference values based on undisturbed soil samples. ERT tests confirmed the usefulness of electrical measurements in the quality assurance of subsoil and hydrotechnical structures. The tests showed weakening zones in the levee body, discontinuity of the vertical sealing system on the modernized section of the embankment, and location of the top of clay deposits.
Various types of trenchless methods are extensively used to create engineering barriers for the purpose of achieving relatively low hydraulic conductivity of the subsoil and hydrotechnical structures. The most commonly used technologies of the grouting curtain creating are the DSM (Deep Soil Mixing), WIPS (Vibro Injcted Thin Wall), low-pressure injection and jet-grouting. Vertical barriers are widely used in environmental control systems to restrict the lateral spreading of liquid or gaseous contaminants and for seepage control through and beneath a levees. The barrier walls are constructed in a single or two phases using a slurry composed mainly of bentonite, cementitious materials and water. Often to solve complex geotechnical problems the technologies are combined (e.g. combining DSM and jet grouting). In the paper some examples of practical application of chosen types of technology dedicated different problems solving are presented. The results of geotechnical investigations of hydraulic permeability, shear strength and depth control of cut-off wall are given. The tests were carried out using BAT system, Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) and drillings. The presented test results should help define the technical and financial criteria that should be used to compare grouting based methods and other techniques applicable to the same geotechnical special works. These recommendations should permit an adequate application of grouting techniques and contribute to finding solutions for the delicate problem of ground sealing, notably when proceeding with hydrotechnical or environmental structures placed below water table.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.