No abstract

Adrenal incidentalomas are being discovered with increasing frequency, and their discovery poses a challenge to clinicians. Despite the 2002 National Institutes of Health consensus statement, there are still discrepancies in the most recent guidelines from organizations representing endocrinology, endocrine surgery, urology and radiology. We review recent guidelines across the specialties involved in diagnosing and treating adrenal incidentalomas, and discuss points of agreement as well as controversy among guidelines. Materials and Methods: PubMedÒ, ScopusÒ, EmbaseÔ and Web of ScienceÔ databases were searched systematically in November 2019 in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement to identify the most recently updated committee produced clinical guidelines in each of the 4 specialties. Five articles met the inclusion criteria. Results: There is little debate among the reviewed guidelines as to the initial evaluation of an adrenal incidentaloma. All patients with a newly discovered adrenal incidentaloma should receive an unenhanced computerized tomogram and hormone screen. The most significant points of divergence among the guidelines regard reimaging an initially benign appearing mass, repeat hormone testing and management of an adrenal incidentaloma that is not easily characterized as benign or malignant on computerized tomography. The guidelines range from actively recommending against any repeat imaging and hormone screening to recommending a repeat scan as early as in 3 to 6 months and annual hormonal screening for several years. Conclusions: After reviewing the guidelines and the evidence used to support them we posit that best practices lie at their convergence and have presented our management recommendations on how to navigate the guidelines when they are discrepant.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction Top surgery (mastectomy and masculinization of the chest) is a key gender affirming operation for many female-to-male transgender patients. Positioning of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is a crucial part of this procedure. To date, there are no standards as to where to place the new NAC based on the patient's anatomy, to achieve the most aesthetically pleasing result. Objective The objectives of this study were to review the literature and analyze the anatomical averages for NAC shape, width, and height as well as vertical and horizontal placement and to compile the recommendations and proposed equations of NAC placement based on chest wall measurements, chest wall landmarks, and body habitus. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted in the spring of 2018. Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria, with objective measurements of, and guidelines for, positioning the male NAC in men that had not been preselected for being aesthetically perfect. Results The average diameter for a round NAC was 25.9 mm (SD, 2.5 mm), and the width and height of the oval-shaped NAC were found to be 25.3 mm (SD, 2.6 mm) and 20.1 mm (SD, 0.75 mm), respectively. The average sternal notch to nipple distance was found to be 19.3 cm (SD, 1.7 cm). The average internipple distance was 22.3 cm (SD, 1.6 cm). Conclusions The data are inconclusive about the effects of anatomical measurements on NAC vertical and horizontal position, but areola diameter is reasonably consistent. There are a wide variety of guidelines and algorithms offered for determining these measurements.

No abstract