Background: In support of the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) completed a toxicological review of trichloroethylene (TCE) in September 2011, which was the result of an effort spanning > 20 years.Objectives: We summarized the key findings and scientific issues regarding the human health effects of TCE in the U.S. EPA’s toxicological review.Methods: In this assessment we synthesized and characterized thousands of epidemiologic, experimental animal, and mechanistic studies, and addressed several key scientific issues through modeling of TCE toxicokinetics, meta-analyses of epidemiologic studies, and analyses of mechanistic data.Discussion: Toxicokinetic modeling aided in characterizing the toxicological role of the complex metabolism and multiple metabolites of TCE. Meta-analyses of the epidemiologic data strongly supported the conclusions that TCE causes kidney cancer in humans and that TCE may also cause liver cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Mechanistic analyses support a key role for mutagenicity in TCE-induced kidney carcinogenicity. Recent evidence from studies in both humans and experimental animals point to the involvement of TCE exposure in autoimmune disease and hypersensitivity. Recent avian and in vitro mechanistic studies provided biological plausibility that TCE plays a role in developmental cardiac toxicity, the subject of substantial debate due to mixed results from epidemiologic and rodent studies.Conclusions: TCE is carcinogenic to humans by all routes of exposure and poses a potential human health hazard for noncancer toxicity to the central nervous system, kidney, liver, immune system, male reproductive system, and the developing embryo/fetus.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of maturation and aging on cardiac output, the distribution of cardiac output, tissue blood flow (determined by using the radioactive-microsphere technique), and body composition in conscious juvenile (2-mo-old), adult (6-mo-old), and aged (24-mo-old) male Fischer-344 rats. Cardiac output was lower in juvenile rats (51 +/- 4 ml/min) than in adult (106 +/- 5 ml/min) or aged (119 +/- 10 ml/min) rats, but cardiac index was not different among groups. The proportion of cardiac output going to most tissues did not change with increasing age. However, the fraction of cardiac output to brain and spinal cord tissue and to skeletal muscle was greater in juvenile rats than that in the two adult groups. In addition, aged rats had a greater percent cardiac output to adipose tissue and a lower percent cardiac output to cutaneous and reproductive tissues than that in juvenile and adult rats. Differences in age also had little effect on mass-specific perfusion rates in most tissues. However, juvenile rats had lower flows to the pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, thyroid and parathyroid glands, and kidneys than did adult rats, and aged rats had lower flows to the white portion of rectus femoris muscle, spleen, thyroid and parathyroid glands, and prostate gland than did adult rats. Body mass of juvenile rats was composed of a lower percent adipose mass and a greater fraction of brain and spinal cord, heart, kidney, liver, and skeletal muscle than that of the adult and aged animals. Relative to the young adult rats, the body mass of aged animals had a greater percent adipose tissue mass and a lower percent skeletal muscle and skin mass. These data demonstrate that maturation and aging have a significant effect on the distribution of cardiac output but relatively little influence on mass-specific tissue perfusion rates in conscious rats. The old-age-related alterations in cardiac output distribution to adipose and cutaneous tissues appear to be associated with the increases in percent body fat and the decreases in the fraction of skin mass, respectively, whereas the decrease in the portion of cardiac output directed to reproductive tissue of aged rats appears to be related to a decrease in mass-specific blood flow to the prostate gland.
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) has dose-dependent tissue distribution because of induction of CYP1A2, a TCDD-binding protein, in the liver. Induction requires transcriptional activation of the CYP1A2 gene product by TCDD and the Ah receptor. An empirical model for dose-dependent distribution (Carrier et al., 1995, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 131, 253-266) included two simple descriptors: one for the maximum liver sequestration (Fmax) and the other for body burden leading to half maximum sequestration (Kd). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models include specific parameters for protein receptors, protein binding, tissue solubility, and protein induction. We have applied a PBPK model to define two macroscopic constants related to these dose-response curves, i.e., the inflection point, and the maximum values of these curves. The dose-response curves generated from the PBPK model were for the proportion sequestered in liver and the liver to fat concentration ratio. Our analysis assessed the specific biological factors in the PBPK model that governed the values of these two macroscopic constants. For the fraction in liver, the Hill coefficient (a shape exponent describing the relationship between the Ah receptor-TCDD complex with the DNA receptor) resulted in the largest shift in inflection when using PBPK model parameters specific for TCDD. For the liver to fat ratio, the inflection point was most affected by the number of available Ah receptors. Conventional normalized sensitivity coefficients for the liver-to-fat ratio at the maximum were highest for the fat-to-blood partition coefficient, CYP1A2 binding affinity, and maximum extent of induction of CYP1A2. A similar pattern was observed for the liver fraction, except that the sensitivity coefficients were much smaller. The behavior of different TCDD congeners was evaluated by altering the value of key parameters. Our results demonstrate that the inflection point is more related to characteristics of DNA binding/induction steps of the Ah receptor-DNA complex than by the CYP1A2 affinity of TCDD or concentrations of CYP1A2. Surprisingly, the maximum is more sensitive to changes in CYP1A2 concentrations and affinity for TCDD. In addition, the analysis showed that the liver-to-fat ratio is a more useful experimental measure than is proportion in liver because the ratio responds with similar sensitivity over a much wider range of input parameters.
Background: The Ramazzini Institute (RI) has completed nearly 400 cancer bioassays on > 200 compounds. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and others have suggested that study design and protocol differences between the RI and other laboratories by may contribute to controversy regarding cancer hazard findings, principally findings on lymphoma/leukemia diagnoses.Objective: We aimed to evaluate RI study design, protocol differences, and accuracy of tumor diagnoses for their impact on carcinogenic hazard characterization.Methods: We analyzed the findings from a recent Pathology Working Group (PWG) review of RI procedures and tumor diagnoses, evaluated consistency of RI and other laboratory findings for chemicals identified by the RI as positive for lymphoma/leukemia, and examined evidence for a number of other issues raised regarding RI bioassays. The RI cancer bioassay design and protocols were evaluated in the context of relevant risk assessment guidance from international authorities.Discussion: Although the PWG identified close agreement with RI diagnoses for most tumor types, it did not find close agreement for lymphoma/leukemia of the respiratory tract or for neoplasms of the inner ear and cranium. Here we discuss a) the implications of the PWG findings, particularly lymphoma diagnostic issues; b) differences between RI studies and those from other laboratories that are relevant to evaluating RI cancer bioassays; and c) future work that may help resolve some concerns.Conclusions: We concluded that a) issues related to respiratory tract infections have complicated diagnoses at that site (i.e., lymphoma/leukemia), as well as for neoplasms of the inner ear and cranium, and b) there is consistency and value in RI studies for identification of other chemical-related neoplasia.Citation: Gift JS, Caldwell JC, Jinot J, Evans MV, Cote I, Vandenberg JJ. 2013. Scientific considerations for evaluating cancer bioassays conducted by the Ramazzini Institute. Environ Health Perspect 121:1253–1263; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306661
Strategies are needed for assessing the risks of exposures to airborne toxicants that vary over concentrations and durations. The goal of this project was to describe the relationship between the concentration and duration of exposure to inhaled trichloroethylene (TCE), a representative volatile organic chemical, tissue dose as predicted by a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model, and neurotoxicity. Three measures of neurotoxicity were studied: hearing loss, signal detection behavior, and visual function. The null hypothesis was that exposure scenarios having an equivalent product of concentration and duration would produce equal toxic effects, according to the classic linear form of Haber's Rule (C x t = k), where C represents the concentration, t, the time (duration) of exposure, and k, a constant toxic effect. All experiments used adult male, Long-Evans rats. Acute and repeated exposure to TCE increased hearing thresholds, and acute exposure to TCE impaired signal detection behavior and visual function. Examination of all three measures of neurotoxicity showed that if Haber's Rule were used to predict outcomes across exposure durations, the risk would be overestimated when extrapolating from shorter to longer duration exposures, and underestimated when extrapolating from longer to shorter duration exposures. For the acute effects of TCE on behavior and visual function, the estimated concentration of TCE in blood at the time of testing correlated well with outcomes, whereas cumulative exposure, measured as the area under the blood TCE concentration curve, did not. We conclude that models incorporating dosimetry can account for differing exposure scenarios and will therefore improve risk assessments over models considering only parameters of external exposure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.