Capillary zone electrophoresis with mass spectrometry (CE-MS) and UV detection (CE-UV) was applied to the quantitative determination of gamma-glutamyl-S-ethenyl-cysteine (GEC), a bioactive and unstable compound present in Vicia narbonensis L. seeds. This compound is responsible for, among other negative effects, palatability reduction and grain toxicity. In order to carry out the quantitative analysis of GEC, different conditions (such as composition, concentration and pH of the background electrolyte, and type and time of extraction) were studied. Also, adequate conditions for electrospray-mass spectrometry of this bioactive compound were investigated. The best extraction conditions of GEC from V. narbonensis L. seeds flour were obtained using ethanol-water (70:30 v/v) for 45 min. The use of a 20 m ammonium hydrogen carbonate at pH 7 provided adequate analytical conditions compatible with the unstable nature of GEC as well as with the requirements of CE-UV and CE-MS analysis. A comparative study was carried out between the different figures of merit of CE-UV and CE-MS for quantitative purposes. Both techniques provided similar limit of detection and can be applied with confidence within the same linear dynamic range. However, reproducibility and speed of analysis were better using CE-UV. The developed methods were readily applied to quantify GEC in seeds of 21 genotypes of V. narbonensis L. A good agreement between CE-MS and CE-UV results was observed corroborating the usefulness of both approaches for quantitative purposes.
Background
CC‐90011 is an oral, potent, selective, reversible inhibitor of lysine‐specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) that was well tolerated, with encouraging activity in patients who had advanced solid tumors or relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma. The authors present long‐term safety and efficacy and novel pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data from the first‐in‐human study of CC‐90011.
Methods
CC‐90011‐ST‐001 (http://clincaltrials.gov identifier NCT02875223; Eudract number 2015–005243‐13) is a phase 1, multicenter study in which patients received CC‐90011 once per week in 28‐day cycles. The objectives were to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and/or recommended phase 2 dose (primary) and to evaluate preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics (secondary).
Results
Sixty‐nine patients were enrolled, including 50 in the dose‐escalation arm and 19 in the dose‐expansion arm. Thrombocytopenia was the most common treatment‐related adverse event and was successfully managed with dose modifications. Clinical activity with prolonged, durable responses were observed, particularly in patients who had neuroendocrine neoplasms. In the dose‐escalation arm, one patient with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma achieved a complete response (ongoing in cycle 58). In the dose‐expansion arm, three patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms had stable disease after nine or more cycles, including one patient who was in cycle 46 of ongoing treatment. CC‐90011 decreased levels of secreted neuroendocrine peptides chromogranin A, progastrin‐releasing peptide, and RNA expression of the blood pharmacodynamic marker monocyte‐to‐macrophage differentiation–associated.
Conclusions
The safety profile of CC‐90011 suggested that its reversible mechanism of action may provide an advantage over other irreversible LSD1 inhibitors. The favorable tolerability profile, clinical activity, durable responses, and once‐per‐week dosing support further exploration of CC‐90011 as monotherapy and in combination with other treatments for patients with advanced solid tumors and other malignancies.
3015 Background: Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that control expression of genes involved in cell growth and oncogenesis. CC-90010 is an oral, potent and reversible BET inhibitor that showed promising activity in lymphoma and solid tumor cell lines and reduced tumor growth in xenograft models. Methods: CC-90010-ST-001 (NCT03220347; 2015-004371-79) is a phase I, first-in-human study of CC-90010 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors and R/R NHL. Three schedules and 11 dose levels were evaluated (Table). Primary objectives were to determine safety, maximum-tolerated dose and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives were the identification of early activity signals, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD). Results: As of 10 Dec 2018, 69 pts were enrolled, 67 with solid tumors and 2 with R/R NHL. Data shown are from all pts (N = 69). The median age was 57 y (range, 21–80), 38 (55%) were male, and the median number of prior systemic anticancer regimens was 3 (range, 1–9). The RP2Ds were dose cohorts 3A and 4B. Dose-limiting toxicities (n = 6) occurred in dose cohorts 3A, 3C, and 4B. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 17 pts (25%), most commonly (≥2 pts) thrombocytopenia (7%), platelet count decreased (4%), fatigue (3%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (3%). No deaths from toxicity occurred. Two pts (endometrial carcinoma and astrocytoma) had a partial response (PR); 1 occurred after the data cutoff. Seven pts had prolonged stable disease (SD) > 9 mo. Exposures and PD marker regulation increased with dose in each dosing schedule; terminal half-life was ~ 73 h. Conclusions: Most of the TRAEs observed were mild or moderate in severity, reversible, and manageable by dose adjustments and/or supportive care. Promising ongoing anticancer activity with prolonged SD and PRs were observed. The preliminary clinical data provide the rationale for dose expansion of CC-90010 in pts with selected advanced malignancies. Clinical trial information: NCT03220347. [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.