A pirólise rápida do ácido oleico foi estudada sobre catalisadores com 10% Ni suportados em sílica e alumina. Os catalisadores foram impregnados com 10% m/m de ácido oleico. Os precursores secos e os catalisadores contendo ácido oleico foram caracterizados por análise termogravimétrica. Os catalisadores calcinados foram analisados por difração de raios X (XRD) e redução à temperatura programada (TPR). As amostras com ácido oleico adsorvido foram submetidos à pirólise rápida a 650 °C. A pirólise de ácido oleico puro levou a 10% de conversão, enquanto a pirólise catalítica resultou em praticamente completa conversão. O catalisador NiO/alumina produziu mais hidrocarbonetos do que o NiO/sílica. Os principais produtos obtidos com NiO/sílica foram 1-alcenos, enquanto que os principais produtos obtidos com NiO/alumina foram isômeros de alcenos e aromáticos, e pequenas quantidades de compostos oxigenados, principalmente álcoois. A pirólise rápida de ácido oleico adsorvido em catalisadoras representa um método útil para distinguir as propriedades dos catalisadores e suas diferentes atividades.Flash pyrolysis of oleic acid was studied over 10 wt.% nickel catalysts supported on silica and alumina. The catalysts were impregnated with 10 wt.% oleic acid. The dried precursors and the catalysts containing oleic acid were characterized by thermogravimetric analysis. The calcined catalysts were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and temperature programmed reduction (TPR). Samples containing adsorbed oleic acid were submitted to flash pyrolysis up to 650 °C. Whereas pyrolysis of oleic acid without catalyst converted only about 10%, the pyrolysis of oleic acid adsorbed on catalysts allowed practically a complete conversion. NiO/alumina yielded a higher amount of liquid hydrocarbons than NiO/silica. The main products obtained with NiO/silica were 1-alkenes, whereas the main products obtained with NiO/alumina were alkene isomers and aromatics. Small amounts of oxygenated compounds were also observed, principally alcohols. The flash pyrolysis of oleic acid adsorbed on different catalyst surfaces appears as a useful way to distinguish activity trends of different catalyst samples.
One way to take advantage from out of speci cation biodiesel and waste from biodiesel tank bottom drainage is to co-process them in a uidized catalytic cracking (FCC) unit. The present work deals with the cracking of oleic acid methyl ester (OAME) as a biodiesel model, under conditions close to that of FCC process over ZSM-5 and Y zeolites, either in protonated or sodium forms, for the production of deoxygenated compounds. Catalytic fast cracking of OAME pre-adsorbed on the catalyst surface was performed, with a catalyst:OAME mass ratio of 10:1 in a micro-pyrolysis system at 650°C, coupled to a GC/MS for on line analysis of the products. Results show that the cracking of OAME without a catalyst favored the formation of linear alkenes and polyenes. Fast cracking of OAME over HZSM-5 and HY acidic zeolites led to the production of aromatics, due to hydrogen transfer. Cracking over NaY and HY zeolites produced remarkable amounts of rami ed saturated hydrocarbons. The formation of alkylated hydrocarbons was not signi cant over ZSM-5 zeolite probably due to a small pore size of this zeolite.NaY catalyst favored the production of hydrocarbons in the range of kerosene (C8-C12). Low acidic zeolites favored the production of non-aromatic hydrocarbons. Product distribution was affected by catalyst shape selectivity and acidity. These results show that residues from the biodiesel chain can be directly co-processed in FCC units to obtain high value hydrocarbons, mainly in the jet fuel and gasoline ranges.
Statement Of NoveltyThis work shows that oleic acid methyl ester as a model of residues from off-spec biodiesel and waste from biodiesel tank bottom drainage can be directly co-processed in a FCC unit, using ZSM-5 and Y zeolites as catalysts in H-and Na-form. The use of such residues in FCC process can promote the production o high value hydrocarbons, mainly in the jet fuel and gasoline ranges. These results may be of great interest to the growing market for renewable jet fuel since the aviation industry is committed to reduce CO2 emissions towards zero net carbon emissions. To the best of our knowledge, such a systematic study has not been reported yet.
One way to take advantage from out of specification biodiesel and waste from biodiesel tank bottom drainage is to co-process them in a fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) unit. The present work deals with the cracking of oleic acid methyl ester (OAME) as a biodiesel model, under conditions close to that of FCC process over ZSM-5 and Y zeolites, either in protonated or sodium forms, for the production of deoxygenated compounds. Catalytic fast cracking of OAME pre-adsorbed on the catalyst surface was performed, with a catalyst:OAME mass ratio of 10:1 in a micro-pyrolysis system at 650°C, coupled to a GC/MS for on line analysis of the products. Results show that the cracking of OAME without a catalyst favored the formation of linear alkenes and polyenes. Fast cracking of OAME over HZSM-5 and HY acidic zeolites led to the production of aromatics, due to hydrogen transfer. Cracking over NaY and HY zeolites produced remarkable amounts of ramified saturated hydrocarbons. The formation of alkylated hydrocarbons was not significant over ZSM-5 zeolite probably due to a small pore size of this zeolite. NaY catalyst favored the production of hydrocarbons in the range of kerosene (C8-C12). Low acidic zeolites favored the production of non-aromatic hydrocarbons. Product distribution was affected by catalyst shape selectivity and acidity. These results show that residues from the biodiesel chain can be directly co-processed in FCC units to obtain high value hydrocarbons, mainly in the jet fuel and gasoline ranges.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.