The present systematic review was performed to investigate if there is evidence justifying the prophylactic extraction of third molars, one of the most frequent procedures in oral surgery. A series of searches was carried out for randomized, clinical trials and systematic reviews in seven databases (MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, BIREME and Cochrane Library), with no restrictions regarding year or language. A supplemental manual search of the references of retrieved articles was also performed. The search strategy resulted in 260 papers. Both the data extracted and the quality of each paper were evaluated independently by two reviewers. After selection based on the preestablished eligibility criteria, four papers qualified for the final analysis. A medium degree of quality and methodological consistency was found in three studies, and low quality was found in one study. No studies showed a high degree of consistency. The most significant flaw was an inadequate sample size. The results of the present review indicate a lack of scientific evidence to justify the indication of the prophylactic extraction of third molars.

OBJETIVO: os rápidos e contínuos avanços nas Ciências da Computação resultaram no aumento significativo do emprego de novas tecnologias em todos os níveis da sociedade. Na Ortodontia, radiografias e fotografias digitais já são usadas de forma rotineira. A utilização de modelos de estudo digitais vem sendo anunciada como o novo componente da documentação ortodôntica computadorizada. Como acontece quando uma nova tecnologia se torna disponível, o uso de modelos ortodônticos digitais tem gerado controvérsias. Alguns ortodontistas questionam a aplicabilidade de imagens tridimensionais em substituição aos modelos tradicionais de gesso, pois não há na literatura número relevante de estudos que tenham testado adequadamente tal tecnologia. Diante disso, o objetivo desse estudo foi testar a confiabilidade do uso de modelos dentários digitais como exame complementar ao diagnóstico ortodôntico. METODOLOGIA: três examinadores mediram a largura dos dentes permanentes, quatro segmentos dos arcos superiores e inferiores, distâncias intercaninos, distâncias intermolares, trespasses horizontal e vertical em modelos de gesso e em seus correspondentes digitais de seis pacientes, utilizando um paquímetro digital e o programa eModel, respectivamente. RESULTADOS E CONCLUSÕES: diante dos resultados, observou-se que todas as medidas avaliadas foram estatisticamente semelhantes nos dois tipos de modelos testados, com exceção das médias encontradas para a largura do dente 45 (p<0,05). Entretanto essa diferença é considerada clinicamente aceitável. Comprova-se com esse estudo a confiabilidade do uso dos modelos dentários digitais como exame complementar ao diagnóstico ortodôntico. Além disso, a facilidade de armazenamento de informações, o menor risco de perda de dados durante sua manipulação e transporte, bem como a diminuição do tempo gasto para realizar as medições foram considerados vantagens do uso dessa nova tecnologia na Ortodontia.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the allergenic potential of orthodontic brackets, comparing the cutaneous sensitivity provoked by metals present in conventional metallic brackets to that provoked by brackets with a low concentration of nickel, known as "nickel-free". A sample was selected from 400 patients undergoing treatment in the orthodontic clinic of the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil), in the period from the beginning of 2002 to the end of 2003. A cutaneous sensitivity patch test containing 5% nickel sulphate was used in 58 patients (30 males and 28 females), aged between 11 and 30, which were using fixed appliances with Morelli brackets in both arches. In a second phase, 30 days later, a comparative test of cutaneous sensitivity was applied to the whole sample with two types of test specimens, in the form of a disc. Two alloys were tested: discs composed of the alloy used in the construction of conventional brackets and discs composed of a nickel-free alloy. The internal part of the forearm was chosen for testing, and 20 test specimens of each experiment (corresponding to the twenty brackets of a complete fixed appliance) were applied. Of the 58 patients evaluated, 16 patients were sensitive to the patch test with 5% nickel sulphate. Out of these 16 patients, 12 developed an allergic reaction to experiment 1 (test specimen with nickel), while in experiment 2, only 5 patients showed sensitivity to that sample. The McNemar test revealed that the nickel-free test specimens provoked less allergic reaction when compared with the conventional alloy (p=0.016).

The present systematic review was performed to investigate if there is evidence justifying the prophylactic extraction of third molars, one of the most frequent procedures in oral surgery. A series of searches was carried out for randomized, clinical trials and systematic reviews in seven databases (MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, BIREME and Cochrane Library), with no restrictions regarding year or language. A supplemental manual search of the references of retrieved articles was also performed. The search strategy resulted in 260 papers. Both the data extracted and the quality of each paper were evaluated independently by two reviewers. After selection based on the preestablished eligibility criteria, four papers qualified for the final analysis. A medium degree of quality and methodological consistency was found in three studies, and low quality was found in one study. No studies showed a high degree of consistency. The most significant flaw was an inadequate sample size. The results of the present review indicate a lack of scientific evidence to justify the indication of the prophylactic extraction of third molars.

No abstract

Ingestion of foreign bodies is a potential complication during orthodontic treatment. These types of accidents may cause serious consequences to the patient, especially if there is a pre-existing systemic condition, such as heart disease or respiratory problems.

No abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of different enamel conditionings on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure patterns of a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) used to bond ceramic brackets. Methods: 105 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were divided into 7 groups according to the enamel surface treatments: conditioners (35% phosphoric acid and 10% polyacrylic acid), type of adhesive (Transbond® and Fuji Ortho LC Capsule®), washing time and drying of the surface. Results: A significant p<0.05 was observed among the shear bond strength values obtained with seven different types of enamel preparation prior to bonding. The group that had the tooth surface conditioned with polyacrylic acid and enamel surface slightly dried before bracket placement showed no significant difference (p>0.05) to the group that had brackets bonded with composite resin. The two groups that had enamel prepared with polyacrylic acid and brackets bonded with GIC on a wet surface showed significantly lower shear bond strength than the control group (p<0.05). Conclusions: Moisture contamination decreased SBS, but not enough to preclude the use of RMGIC as an alternative to composite resin (CR) for direct bonding of ceramic brackets.