Summary Background Ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease. However, a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to ustekinumab. The current evidence to support the effectiveness of dose‐optimisation for ustekinumab nonresponse is limited. Aim To assess the effectiveness of dose escalation of ustekinumab. Methods This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We included active Crohn's disease patients who received a standard‐dose intravenous induction and at least one subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg dose. All enrolled patients received dose escalation by either shortening the interval between the doses to every 4 or 6 weeks, intravenous reinduction or a combination of strategies. The primary outcome of the study was clinical response at week 16 after dose escalation. Results A total of 142 patients (22 centres/14 countries) were included. The patients were dose‐escalated after a median treatment duration of 30 weeks. At week 16 from escalation, 73/142 (51.4%) responded to treatment, including 55/142 (38.7%) in clinical remission. Corticosteroid‐free remission was achieved in 6/34 (17.6%) patients on corticosteroids at the time of escalation; 118/142 (83%) continued treatment beyond week 16. Follow‐up data beyond week 16 were available for 74/118 (62.7%) patients. On the last follow‐up, 51/98 (52%) patients with available data responded to treatment, including 41/98 (42%) in clinical remission. Conclusions Intensification of ustekinumab maintenance dosage was effective in over 50% of the patients. This strategy should be considered in patients who are nonresponsive to every 8 weeks ustekinumab maintenance dosing.

Background Hypogammaglobulinemia is a disorder characterized by low serum immunoglobulin levels and had high prevalence of gastrointestinal manifestations. In some cases, clinical and endoscopic features are indistinguishable from those of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods This was a multicenter case series performed as a part of the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) Collaborative Network of Exceptionally Rare case reports (CONFER) project. Results This report includes 27 patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia and IBD-like features [20 males and 7 females, median age 45.6 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 35.2-59]. Crohn’s disease-like features were noted in 23 patients, four patients had ulcerative colitis-like features. The diagnosis of hypogammaglobulinemia preceded IBD-like features diagnosis in 20 patients (median of 7 years prior, IQR 2.6-20.6 years), and followed IBD-like features appearance in 7 cases (median of one year after, IQR 0.45-5.6 years).Hypogammaglobulinemia etiologies were common variable immunodeficiency (66.6%), agammaglobulinemia (7.4%), selective IgA-deficiency (11.1%), Goods syndrome (7.4%), IgG subclass deficiency with IgA deficiency (3.7%) and hyper-IgM (3.7%). In addition to antibiotics and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for hypogammaglobulinemia, 12 patients received IBD-related treatment including 5-ASA (2 patients), corticosteroids (1 patient), thiopurines (3 patients), anti-TNFs (4 patients) and vedolizumab (2 patients). By the end of the follow-up [44.5 months (IQR 18-81)], 21/27 (77%) patients were in clinical remission. Conclusion This case series describes IBD-like features in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia. The diagnosis of IBD-like features mainly occurred after that of hypogammaglobulinemia, with successful recovery in the majority of cases after appropriate treatment.

Background Endoscopic-post-operative-recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn’s disease (CD) after ileocecal resection (ICR) is a major concern. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early prophylaxis with biologics and to compare anti-TNF therapy to vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) in a real-world setting. Methods A retrospective multicenter study of CD-adults after curative ICR on early prophylaxis. ePOR was defined as a Rutgeerts score [RS]≥i2 or colonic-segmental-SES-CD≥6. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors, and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to compare the effectiveness between agents. Results Included 297 patients (53.9% males, age at diagnosis 24y[19-32], age at ICR-34y[26-43], 18.5% smokers, 27.6% biologic-naïve, 65.7% anti-TNF experienced, 28.6%≥2 biologics, and 17.2% previous surgery). Overall, 224, 39 and 34 patients received anti-TNF, VDZ or UST, respectively. Patients treated with VDZ and UST were more biologic experienced with higher rates of previous surgery. ePOR rates within 1-year were: 41.8%. ePOR rates by treatment groups: anti-TNF 40.2%, VDZ 33% and UST 61.8%. Risk factors for ePOR at 1-year: past-infliximab (adj.OR=1.73[95%CI:1.01-2.97]), past-adalimumab (adj.OR=2.32[95% CI:1.35-4.01) and surgical aspects. After IPTW, the risk of ePOR within 1-year of VDZ vs. anti-TNF or UST vs. anti-TNF was comparable (OR=0.55[95%CI:0.25-1.19], OR=1.86[95%CI:0.79-4.38]), respectively. Conclusion Prevention of ePOR within 1-year after surgery was successful in ~60% of patients. Patients treated with VDZ or UST consisted of a more refractory group. After controlling for confounders, no differences in ePOR risk were seen between anti-TNF prophylaxis and other groups.

No abstract

Background Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is rarely associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Long-term outcomes of AIP and IBD in patients with AIP-IBD coexistence and predictors of complicated AIP course are scarcely known. Methods An ECCO COllaborative Network For Exceptionally Rare case reports project (ECCO-CONFER) collected cases of AIP diagnosed in patients with IBD. Complicated AIP was defined as a composite of endocrine and/or exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and/or pancreatic cancer. We explored factors associated with complicated AIP in IBD. Results We included 96 patients (53% males, 79% ulcerative colitis, 72% type 2 AIP, age at AIP diagnosis 35±16 years). The majority of Crohn’s disease (CD) cases (78%) had colonic/ileocolonic involvement. In 59%, IBD preceded AIP diagnosis, whereas 18% were diagnosed simultaneously. Advanced therapy to control IBD was used in 61% and 17% underwent IBD-related surgery. 82% of patients were treated with steroids for AIP, the majority of which (91%) responded to a single course of treatment. During a mean follow-up of 7 years, AIP complications occurred in 25/96 (26%) individuals. In a multivariate model, younger age at AIP diagnosis (OR=1.05, P=0.008), family history of IBD (OR=0.1, P=0.03) and CD diagnosis (OR=0.2, P=0.04) were associated with uncomplicated AIP course. No IBD or AIP-related deaths occurred. Conclusions In this large international cohort of patients with concomitant AIP-IBD, most patients have type 2 AIP and colonic IBD. AIP course is relatively benign and long-term outcomes are favourable, however, one-quarter develop pancreatic complications. Age, familial history of IBD and CD may predict uncomplicated AIP course.

Background Ustekinumab (UST) is an effective agent for induction and maintenance of response and remission in Crohn’s disease (CD). In addition to randomised controlled trials, an abundance of real-world evidence is available as well, suggesting that a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to UST therapy. To date, there is very little evidence to support the effectiveness of dose-optimisation strategy to manage primary or secondary non-response to ustekinumab. Methods This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Clinical Committee of ECCO. We included active (HBI≥5; CDAI ≥220) CD patients that received a standard-dose IV induction and at least one SC UST dose of 90 mg. Patients with ostomy were excluded. All patients received dose escalation by either shortening the interval between the doses to q4/6 weeks, intravenous reinduction or a combination of intravenous and subcutaneous escalation. The primary aim of the study was a clinical response (defined as Δ HBI≥3 or Δ CDAI ≥ 70 points) at week 16 after dose escalation. Clinical remission was defined as HBI<5 or CDAI <150. Results Of 140 patients, 83 (59.3%) were females, median age at treatment onset 36 (26–50) years, median duration of disease 9 (5–18) years from 21 centres in 13 countries (12 Europe, 1 Canada) were included. The patients were dose-escalated after a median treatment duration of 30 (20–45) weeks. Thirty-four (24,3%) were previously escalated from q12 to q8 maintenance regimen. Eighty-nine (63.5%) of the patients were escalated from q8 to q4 regimen, 20 (14.3%) – from q8 to q6, 15 (10.7%) received intravenous reinduction and 16 (11.4%) – a combination of intravenous reinduction and subcutaneous dose interval shortening. At week 16 from escalation, 83 (59.3%) responded to treatment, of them 21 (15%) were in clinical remission. Thirty-three (23.6%) of the patients were on systemic corticosteroids upon escalation; 7/33 (21.2%) achieved corticosteroid-free remission at week 16. One hundred and nine patients (77.8%) continued treatment beyond week 16. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 75/150 (53.6%) of the patients (median duration of follow-up: 35 (32–54) weeks) from dose escalation. At the last follow-up, 53/75 (70.7%) continued to respond to treatment, including 42 (56%) in clinical remission; 25/75 (33%) discontinued treatment at last follow-up. Conclusion This large multicentre retrospective study demonstrates that intensification of ustekinumab maintenance dosage may be effective in up to 60% of the patients. This strategy should be considered in patients that are non-responsive to q8 ustekinumab maintenance dosing.

Background: Multiple studies have described the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) failing anti- Tumor necrosis factors (TNFs); however, the effectiveness of VDZ or UST as a third-class biologic has not yet been described. Aims and Methods: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of VDZ and UST as a third-class biologic in patients with CD. Results: Two-hundred and four patients were included; 156/204 (76%) patients received VDZ as a second- and UST as a third-class therapy (group A); the remaining 48/204 (24%) patients received UST as a second- and VDZ as a third-class therapy (group B). At week 16–22, 87/156 (55.5%) patients and 27/48 (56.2%) in groups A and B, respectively, responded to treatment (p = 0.9); 41/156 (26.2%) and 15/48 (31.2%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5). At week 52; 89/103 (86%) patients and 25/29 (86.2%) of the patients with available data had responded to third-class treatment in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.9); 31/103 (30%) and 47/29 (24.1%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5). Conclusion: Third-class biological therapy was effective in more than half of the patients with CD. No differences in effectiveness were detected between the use of VDZ and UST as a third-class agent.

Background Ustekinumab (UST) is increasingly used in Belgium for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD). The aim of the current study was to describe the real-life experience with UST in our tertiary centre. Methods A retrospective study was performed in patients with CD who were started on UST between December 2017 and August 2019. All patients received an initial intravenous (IV) dose of 6 mg/kg body-weight, followed by 8-weekly 90 mg subcutaneous UST. The clinical and endoscopic response was assessed by the physician after induction and during the maintenance phase. Results In total, 67 patients were included, of which the majority was refractory to anti-TNF and/or vedolizumab (Table 1). The median duration of treatment was 15 months (IQR 7–25). The clinical and endoscopic response is shown in Table 2. UST was discontinued in 16 patients (23.9%) after a median of 27.5 weeks (IQR 12.3–52.8). Reasons for discontinuation were a loss of response (LOR), including 5 patients who were in need of surgery (n = 10), primary non response (n = 3), malignancy (n = 1), adverse event (n = 1) and patients’ wish (n = 1). In 29 patients (43.3%) optimisation of UST was necessary due to partial response (n = 13) or due to LOR (n = 16). The optimisation consisted of an IV re-induction in 2 patients, shortening of the dosage interval in 16 patients and a combination of both in 11 patients. The effect of optimisation could be assessed in 22 patients: 10 patients regained a good clinical response and 5 patients attained clinical remission after optimisation. In 7 patients UST was stopped despite optimisation, most often due to persistent LOR. Conclusion In this tertiary population of refractory CD patients, treatment with UST resulted in a clinical response in more than 70% of patients. Of note, 43.3% needed optimisation, with a good clinical response in almost half of the cases. The endoscopic response in this preliminary analysis was modest.