2022
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn’s Disease After Curative Ileocecal Resection with Early Prophylaxis by Anti-TNF, Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab: A Real-World Multicentre European Study

Abstract: Background Endoscopic-post-operative-recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn’s disease (CD) after ileocecal resection (ICR) is a major concern. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early prophylaxis with biologics and to compare anti-TNF therapy to vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) in a real-world setting. Methods A retrospective multicenter study of CD-adults after curative ICR on early prophylaxis. ePOR was defined as a Rutge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other retrospective studies looked at the utility of ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the post-operative setting. A retrospective multicenter study found rates of endoscopic post-operative recurrence, defined as Rutgeerts score of >i1 or colonic-segmental-SES-CD of >5 within 1 year, as 33% for vedolizumab and 61.8% for ustekinumab; the authors also found that patients treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab tended to have more experience with prior biologics and surgery [ 80 ]. A small retrospective study defining endoscopic recurrence as Rutgeerts score of >i1 at 6 months found that after inversed probability of treatment weighting, endoscopic recurrence was lower with ustekinumab compared with AZA (28.0% vs 54.5%, P = 0.029) [ 81 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other retrospective studies looked at the utility of ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the post-operative setting. A retrospective multicenter study found rates of endoscopic post-operative recurrence, defined as Rutgeerts score of >i1 or colonic-segmental-SES-CD of >5 within 1 year, as 33% for vedolizumab and 61.8% for ustekinumab; the authors also found that patients treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab tended to have more experience with prior biologics and surgery [ 80 ]. A small retrospective study defining endoscopic recurrence as Rutgeerts score of >i1 at 6 months found that after inversed probability of treatment weighting, endoscopic recurrence was lower with ustekinumab compared with AZA (28.0% vs 54.5%, P = 0.029) [ 81 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 25 , 26 Recent data have also shown that both vedolizumab and ustekinumab may be used in this setting with results comparable to anti‐TNFs. 10 , 27 In our “prophylaxis group”, no difference was found in endoscopic recurrence rates between patients administered with anti‐TNF agents and those with other immunomodulators, although it is difficult to draw conclusions in the absence of adequate power for this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“… 4 The postoperative recurrence (POR) of CD is more likely to occur in the presence of any of the known clinical risk factors, such as smoking, prior intestinal surgery, penetrating disease at index surgery, perianal location, and extensive small bowel resection (>50 cm). 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 On the other hand, it has been shown that early treatment with thiopurines or anti‐TNF 10 as well as the use of Kono‐S anastomosis 11 play some protective role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В частности, рассмотрены как различные возрастные группы, так и подкожный и внутривенный пути введения, а также 4-, 8-и 12-недельный режимы введения. Отдельно рассмотрены возможности применения устекинумаба у беременных [8], педиатрических пациентов [9], у лиц, перенесших хирургическое вмешательство по поводу болезни Крона [10][11][12], а также лиц, имеющих внекишечные проявления заболевания [13]. В качестве критериев эффективности выступали как клинические проявления, так и эндоскопические и лабораторные показатели.…”
Section: Bowel Diseaseunclassified