PURPOSE Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy that is almost always fatal and lacks effective systemic treatment options for patients with BRAF-wild type disease. As part of a phase I/II study in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors, patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma were treated with spartalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor. METHODS We enrolled patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in a phase II cohort of the study. Patients received 400 mg spartalizumab intravenously, once every 4 weeks. The overall response rate was determined according to RECIST v1.1. RESULTS Forty-two patients were enrolled. Adverse events were consistent with those previously observed with PD-1 blockade. Most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (12%), pruritus (12%), fatigue (7%), and pyrexia (7%). The overall response rate was 19%, including three patients with a complete response and five with a partial response. Most patients had baseline tumor biopsies positive for PD-L1 expression (n = 28/40 evaluable), and response rates were higher in PD-L1–positive (8/28; 29%) versus PD-L1–negative (0/12; 0%) patients. The highest rate of response was observed in the subset of patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% (6/17; 35%). Responses were seen in both BRAF-nonmutant and BRAF-mutant patients and were durable, with a 1-year survival of 52.1% in the PD-L1–positive population. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to show responsiveness of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma to PD-1 blockade.

Purpose: Well-differentiated (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated (DDLPS) liposarcoma are characterized by co-amplification of the murine double minute-2 (MDM2) and cyclin-dependent kinase-4 (CDK4) oncogenes. Siremadlin, a p53–MDM2 inhibitor, was combined with ribociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in patients with locally advanced/metastatic WDLPS or DDLPS who had radiologically progressed on, or despite, prior systemic therapy. Patients and Methods: In this proof-of-concept, phase Ib, dose-escalation study, patients received siremadlin and ribociclib across different regimens until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, and/or treatment discontinuation: Regimen A [4-week cycle: siremadlin once daily (QD) and ribociclib QD (2 weeks on, 2 weeks off)], Regimen B [3-week cycle: siremadlin once every 3 weeks; ribociclib QD (2 weeks on, 1 week off)], and Regimen C [4-week cycle: siremadlin once every 4 weeks; ribociclib QD (2 weeks on, 2 weeks off)]. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of siremadlin plus ribociclib in one or more regimens. Results: As of October 16, 2019 (last patient last visit), 74 patients had enrolled. Median duration of exposure was 13 (range, 1–174) weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 10 patients, most of which were Grade 3/4 hematologic events. The RDE was siremadlin 120 mg every 3 weeks plus ribociclib 200 mg QD (Regimen B). Three patients achieved a partial response, and 38 achieved stable disease. One patient (Regimen C) died as a result of treatment-related hematotoxicity. Conclusions: Siremadlin plus ribociclib demonstrated manageable toxicity and early signs of antitumor activity in patients with advanced WDLPS or DDLPS.

Background: Well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS/DDLPS) is characterized by a consistent coamplification of human double minute 2 homolog (HDM2) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) which inactivates the tumor suppressor pathways p53 and Rb, respectively. HDM201 is a selective inhibitor of the p53-HDM2 interaction and ribociclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Preclinical studies suggested a synergy in in vitro and in vivo models of WDLPS/DDLPS and both agents have demonstrated single-agent clinical activity in solid tumors. We aim to determine the optimal dose and regimen of HDM201 + ribociclib and to assess the preliminary antitumor activity of this combination in patients (pts) with liposarcoma. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, Phase Ib ongoing study, pts with locally advanced or metastatic liposarcoma that had unequivocally progressed on, or despite prior systemic therapy were treated orally with HDM201 + ribociclib. Three treatment regimens were explored: Regimen (Reg) 1 (HDM201 + ribociclib daily for the first 2 wks [QD 1st 2 wks] in a 4-wk cycle), Reg 4 (HDM201 every 3 wks + ribociclib QD 1st 2 wks in a 3-wk cycle), and Reg 5 (HDM201 every 4 wks + ribociclib QD 1st 2 wks in a 4-wk cycle). Results: As of Nov 21, 2017, 74 pts received HDM201 + ribociclib (Reg 1 n=26; Reg 4 n=29; Reg 5 n=19); 12 pts (6 each in Reg 4 and 5) were still receiving treatment. Ten pts (Reg 1 n=3; Reg 4 n=6; Reg 5 n=1) discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs) and 2 pts (1 each in Reg 4 and 5) died. The most common AE of any grade, regardless of cause, reported across regimens (Reg 1; Reg 4; Reg 5) was nausea (81%; 76%; 63%) which was mainly Grade 1/2 and not dose limiting. Common Grade 3/4 AEs regardless of cause included neutropenia (39%; 52%; 42%), thrombocytopenia (35%; 45%; 42%), anemia (27%; 17%; 21%), leukopenia (27%; 28%; 37%), and lymphopenia (15%; 14%; 21%). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 16 pts (2; 9; 5) and all except 1 (prolonged QT) were hematologic (including neutropenia [n=5], thrombocytopenia [n=4], febrile neutropenia, and anemia [n=2 each]). Partial responses were observed in 3 (4%) pts (2 in Reg 4; 1 in Reg 5). Stable disease was achieved by 36 (49%) pts (11 in Reg 1; 16 in Reg 4; 9 in Reg 5). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-8.2 mo) in Reg 1, 4.8 mo (95% CI: 3.9 mo-not reached) in Reg 4, and 2.1 mo (95% CI: 1.4 mo-not reached) in Reg 5. Conclusions: HDM201 + ribociclib demonstrated a manageable safety profile and preliminary efficacy in pts with locally advanced or metastatic WDLPS/DDLPS, with hematologic toxicities being dose limiting. The median PFS in Reg 4 compares favorably with single-agent CDK4 inhibitors and, alongside a tolerable safety profile, suggests further exploration of this regimen may be warranted in Phase II studies of HDM201 + ribociclib in this patient population. Citation Format: Albiruni Abdul Razak, Sebastian Bauer, Jean-Yves Blay, Richard Quek, Cristina Suárez, Chia-Chi Lin, Marie L. Hütter-Krönke, Ricardo Cubedo, Stephane Ferretti, Christophe Meille, Ensar Halilovic, Giorgia Clementi, Maria Santos-Rosa, Nelson Guerreiro, Astrid Jullion, Claire Fabre, Antoine Italiano. Results of a dose- and regimen-finding Phase Ib study of HDM201 in combination with ribociclib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic liposarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT009.

no Abstract

O utcome of patients with primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia remains unsatisfactory. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (3 mg/m² intravenously on day 1), all-trans retinoic acid (45 mg/m² orally on days 4-6 and 15 mg/m² orally on days 7-28), high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m²/12 h intravenously on days 1-3) and mitoxantrone (12 mg/m² intravenously on days 2-3) in 93 patients aged 18-60 years refractory to one cycle of induction therapy. Primary end point of the study was response to therapy; secondary end points included evaluation of toxicities, in particular, rate of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery was achieved in 47 (51%) and partial remission in 10 (11%) patients resulting in an overall response rate of 61.5%; 33 (35.5%) patients had refractory disease and 3 patients (3%) died. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation was performed in 71 (76%) patients; 6 of the 71 (8.5%) patients developed moderate or severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after transplantation. Four-year overall survival rate was 32% (95% confidence interval 24%-43%). Patients responding to salvage therapy and undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=51) had a 4-year survival rate of 49% (95% confidence intervaI 37%-64%). Patients with fms-like tyrosine kinase internal tandem duplication positive acute myeloid leukemia had a poor outcome despite transplantation. In conclusion, the described regimen is an effective and tolerable salvage therapy for patients who are primary refractory to one cycle of conventional intensive induction therapy. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00143975) Salvage therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone in combination with all-trans retinoic acid and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute myeloid leukemia refractory to first induction therapy

not abstract, please contact Dr. Hentzelt, Publication manager Karger

No abstract

IntroductionVaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is approved and recommended for immunocompromised patients such as patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Since infections represent a relevant cause of transplant related mortality we analyzed the advent of immunization to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a bicentric population of allogeneic transplanted patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data of allo-SCT recipients in two German transplantation centers for safety and serologic response after two and three SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Patients received mRNA vaccines or vector-based vaccines. All patients were monitored for antibodies against SARS-CoV2-spike protein (anti-S-IgG) with an IgG ELISA assay or an EIA Assay after two and three doses of vaccination.ResultsA total of 243 allo-SCT patients underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The median age was 59 years (range 22-81). While 85% of patients received two doses of mRNA vaccines, 10% had vector-based vaccines and 5% received a mixed vaccination. The two vaccine doses were well tolerated with only 3% patients developing a reactivation of graft versus host disease (GvHD). Overall, 72% of patients showed a humoral response after two vaccinations. In the multivariate analysis age at time of allo-SCT (p=0.0065), ongoing immunosuppressive therapy (p= 0.029) and lack of immune reconstitution (CD4-T-cell counts <200/μl, p< 0.001) were associated with no response. Sex, intensity of conditioning and the use of ATG showed no influence on seroconversion. Finally, 44 out of 69 patients that did not respond after the second dose received a booster and 57% (25/44) showed a seroconversion.DiscussionWe showed in our bicentric allo-SCT patient cohort, that a humoral response could be achieve after the regular approved schedule, especially for those patients who underwent immune reconstitution and were free from immunosuppressive drugs. In over 50% of the initial non-responders after 2-dose vaccination, a seroconversion can be achieved by boostering with a third dose.