Bisphenol A (BPA) is a monomer used mainly in the synthesis of polycarbonates and epoxy resins. Percutaneous absorption is the second source of exposure, after inhalation, in the work environment. However, studies on this route of absorption are lacking or incomplete. In this study, percutaneous BPA absorption was measured in vivo and ex vivo in the rat, and ex vivo in humans. An approximately 12-fold difference in permeability between rat skin and human skin was found, with permeability being higher in the rat. In addition, inter- and intra-individual variability of up to tenfold was observed in humans. No accumulation of BPA in the skin was found during exposure. The skin clearance rate following exposure was estimated at 0.4 μg/cm²/h. Ex vivo and in vivo percutaneous absorption fluxes of BPA in the rat were in the same range (about 2.0 μg/cm²/h), suggesting that extrapolation to the in vivo situation in humans may be possible. The European tolerable daily intake (TDI) of BPA is 50 μg/kg body weight. However, many research projects have highlighted the significant effects of BPA in rodents at doses lower than 10 μg/kg/day. A 1-h occupational exposure over 2,000 cm² (forearms and hands) may lead to a BPA absorption of 4 μg/kg/day. This is 8% of the European TDI and is very close to the value at which effects have been observed in animals. This absorption must therefore be taken into account when evaluating risks of BPA exposure, at least until more relevant results on the toxicity of BPA in humans are available.

This article is available online at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org

No abstract

No abstract

In addition to inhalation, dermal absorption is a route of exposure to be considered when assessing occupational risks. To investigate dermal penetration of chemicals, human skin samples are regarded as the gold standard. As human samples can be difficult to obtain, many experiments are performed with rat skins, and the results extrapolated to describe human percutaneous absorption. Here, we examined the characteristics of rat skin samples and compared absorption to that measured with in vitro human skin. The thickness of the stratum corneum layer in rat skin samples was found to be uniform when samples were excised from the animals' backs once they were at least 7-weeks-old. Overall, dorsal skin samples from mature rats could be reliably used to measure the flux of hydrophilic liquid molecules, such as N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, and N,N-dimethylformamide. In contrast, with a solid lipophilic substance, bisphenol A, dissolved in acetone, the flux obtained with rat skin samples was 3-fold higher than that measured with human skin. Consequently, it does not appear relevant to use rat skin in place of human skin to measure absorption of solid lipophilic substances.