Campbell, B. C.V. et al. (2019) Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.ABSTRACT Background: CT-perfusion (CTP) and MRI may assist patient selection for endovascular thrombectomy. We aimed to establish whether imaging assessments of ischaemic core and penumbra volumes were associated with functional outcomes and treatment effect.

In the largest published series of patients with CEAD, we observed significant differences between VAD and ICAD in terms of risk factors, baseline features, and functional outcome.

Campbell, B. C. V. et al. (2018) Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurology, 17(1), pp. 47-53. (doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30407-6) This is the author's final accepted version.There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/149670/ variables. An alternative approach using propensity-score stratification was also used. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modeling with a random effect for trial incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool.Findings: Of 1764 patients in 7 trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 who did not undergo the procedure and 2 with missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236/797 (30%) of endovascular patients were treated under GA. At baseline, GA patients were younger and had shorter time to randomisation but similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared to non-GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months versus standard care in both GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95%CI 1·09-2·11, p=0·014) and non-GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95%CI 1·75-3·10, p<0·001) patients. However, outcomes were significantly better for those treated under non-GA versus GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95%CI 1·14-2·04, p=0·004; propensitystratified cOR 1·44 95%CI 1·08-1·92, p=0·012). The risk of bias and variability among studies was assessed to be low.Interpretation: Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons. Funding:The HERMES collaboration was funded by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. Research in contextEvidence before this study between abolition of the thrombectomy treatment effect in MR CLEAN and no effect in THRACE. Three single-centre randomised trials of general anaesthesia versus conscious sedation found either no difference in functional outcome between groups or a slight benefit of general anaesthesia. Added value of this studyThese data from contemporary, high quality randomised trials form the largest study to date of the association between general anesthesia and the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care. We used two different approaches to adjust for baseline imbalances (multivariable logistic regression and propensity-score stratification). We found that GA for endovascular thrombectomy, as practiced in contemporary clinical care across a wide range of expert centres during the rand...

PCT seems to be an important environmental determinant of CeAD, but was not an independent outcome predictor. Because of the characteristics of most PCTs, the term mechanical trigger event rather than trauma may be more appropriate.

Background: Stroke outcomes are worse in patients admitted at nonworking hours (NWH), but whether this is also true in patients treated with intravenous (i.v.) thrombolysis has not been definitely proven. Objective: Our aim was to test the hypothesis that stroke patients treated by i.v. rt-PA at NWH have a worse outcome than those treated at working hours (WH). Methods: We compared outcomes at 7 days and at 3 months, between patients treated at NWH and at WH in the stroke unit of the Lille University Hospital. Results: Of 252 consecutive patients [median age: 69 years; 132 men (52.4%); median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score: 14; median onset-to-needle time: 150 min], 134 (53.2%) were treated at NWH. They did not differ for baseline characteristics and proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores 0–1 and 0–2 at 3 months. Patients treated at WH were more likely to die before 7 days (12.7 vs. 4.5%; adjusted odds ratio: 3.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.2–10.4) and at 3 months (21.6 vs. 11.4%; adjusted odds ratio: 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.02–4.7). The causes of death did not differ between NWH and WH. At NWH, there was no difference in baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients treated by stroke- and nonstroke neurologists. Conclusion: The case fatality rates were unexpectedly higher at WH than at NWH. If this finding can be reproduced and is not a chance finding, we should identify explanations, especially organisational issues, chronobiological factors or summation of subtle – nonsignificant – baseline differences.

Indicators of abdominal adiposity, especially WHtR, are more strongly associated with stroke risk than BMI. These results emphasize the importance of measuring abdominal adiposity, especially in lean subjects.

Pre-hospital notification enhances thrombolysis rate and improves intra-hospital delays, but the impact of the notification to the neurologist by the emergency medical system (EMS) call centre remains unknown. Our objective was to compare pre-hospital and in-hospital delays in stroke patients treated by intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), with and without pre-hospital notification. We compared baseline characteristics and in-hospital delays in stroke patients treated by rt-PA with a high-level notification (call to EMS and EMS-neurologist discussion), a low-level notification (call to EMS without EMS-neurologist discussion ) and no pre-hospital notification. Of 302 consecutive patients [165 women, 54.6 %; median age 74 years, interquartile range (IQR) 59-83], patients with high-level, low-level and no notification differed for the severity at admission (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, respectively, of: 12, IQR 7-17; 9, IQR 6-15, and 8, IQR 6-14, p = 0.029). Patients with high-level notification had shorter (1) admission-to-completion of imaging times (27 min, IQR 14-35) than patients with low-level notification (35 min, IQR 17-54) or no notification (36 min, IQR 30-58) (p < 0.01); (2) door-to-needle times (49 min, IQR 39-62 vs. 57 min, IQR 39-81 vs. 63 min, IQR 51-97; p = 0.003); and (3) onset-to-needle times (140 min, IQR 110-175 vs. 155 min, IQR 106-230 vs. 182 min, IQR 131-234; p < 0.001). They did not differ for onset-to-admission time and imaging-to-needle time. Pre-hospital notification by the EMS reduces intra-hospital delays in patients eligible for rt-PA, but the benefit is higher in the case of discussion between the EMS and the neurologist before admission.

Patients with in-hospital strokes (IHS) may be eligible for recanalization therapies. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes in patients with IHS and community-onset strokes (COS) treated by recanalization therapy. We analysed data prospectively collected in consecutive patients treated by thrombolysis, thrombectomy, or both for cerebral ischemia at the Lille University Hospital. We compared four outcomes measures at 3 months in patients with IHS and COS: (1) modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-1, (2) mRS 0-2, (3) death, and (4) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (ECASS 2 definition). Of 1209 patients, 64 (5.3%) had IHS, with an increasing proportion over time (p = 0.001). Their median onset-to-needle time was 128 min vs. 145 in COS (p < 0.001). They were more likely to have had a recent TIA [odds ratio (OR) 30.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.5-78.7], to have been treated by vitamin K antagonist before (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4-12.0) and to undergo mechanical thrombectomy (45 vs. 10%, p < 0.001). They were less likely to have a pre-stroke mRS 0-1 (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.09-0.50). After adjustment, IHS was not associated with any of the four outcome measures. Patients with IHS are treated 17 min earlier than patients with COS, but, taking into account that they were already in the hospital, delays are still too long. Their outcome does not differ from that of patients with COS, suggesting room for improvement if delays can be reduced. IHS being frequent, pre-specified pathways should be organised.