Background: Limited empirical evidence exists for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment-asprevention. The Surveillance and Treatment of Prisoners with hepatitis C (SToP-C) study assessed HCV treatment-as-prevention in four Australian prisons.Methods: SToP-C is a non-randomised trial, including a pre/post analysis within a prospective longitudinal cohort of people incarcerated in two maximum-(male) and two medium-security prisons (one male, one female). All prison inmates at least 18 years were eligible for enrolment.Participants were enrolled from late-2014 to 2019. Following HCV testing, participants were monitored for risk behaviors and HCV, among three sub-populations: 1) uninfected (HCV antibody negative); 2) previously infected (HCV antibody positive, HCV RNA negative); 3) infected (HCV antibody and HCV RNA positive). Uninfected and previously infected (at-risk) participants were followed every 3-6 months for HCV primary infection and re-infection, respectively. Infected participants were assessed for treatment, initially standard of care treatment (by prison health services), followed by direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment scale-up from mid-2017 (12 weeks sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, through SToP-C). Participants were followed until study closure in November 2019. The primary study outcome was HCV incidence compared between pre-and post-treatment scale-up periods among participants at risk of HCV primary infection or re-infection. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02064049) Findings: Of 3,691 participants enrolled, 719 (19%) had detectable HCV RNA and 2,965 were at-risk of primary infection (n=2,240) or re-infection (n=725) at baseline. DAA treatment was initiated in 349/499 eligible participants during the treatment scale-up period. Among at-risk population with longitudinal follow-up (n=1,643; median age 33 years; 82% male), 31% reported injecting drug use in prison. HCV incidence declined by 48%, from 8.31 to 4.35/100 person-years between pre-and post-treatment scale-up periods [Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR): 4 0.52, 95%CI: 0.36, 0.78]. Incidence of primary infection declined from 6.64 to 2.85/100 personyears (IRR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.25, 0.74), while incidence of re-infection declined from 12.36 to 7.27/100 person-years (IRR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.35, 1.00). Among participants reporting injecting drug use in the current imprisonment, incidence of primary infection declined from 39.08 to 14.03/100 person-years (IRR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.16, 0.80), and incidence of re-infection declined from 15.26 to 9.34/100 person-years (IRR: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.34, 1.09). Adjusted analysis indicated a significant reduction in HCV risk between pre-and post-treatment scale-up periods (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.76).Interpretation: DAA treatment scale-up was associated with reduced HCV incidence in prison, indicative of HCV treatment-as-prevention. The findings support broad DAA treatment scale-up among incarcerated populations.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Injection drug use (IDU) following treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) may lead to reinfection, particularly if access to harm reduction services is suboptimal. This study assessed HCV reinfection risk following direct-acting antiviral therapy within Australian prisons that had opioid agonist therapy (OAT) programs but did not have needle and syringe programs (NSP). Methods The Surveillance and Treatment of Prisoners with hepatitis C (SToP-C) study enrolled people incarcerated in four prisons between 2014-2019. Participants treated for HCV were followed every 3-6 months to identify reinfection (confirmed by sequencing). Reinfection incidence and associated factors were evaluated. Findings Among 388 participants receiving treatment, 161 had available post-treatment follow-up and were included in analysis (92% male; median age 33 years; 67% IDU in prison; median follow-up 9 months). Among those with recent (in the past month) IDU (n=71), 90% had receptive needle/syringe sharing. During 145 person-years (PY) of follow-up, 18 cases of reinfection were identified. Reinfection incidence was 12.5/100 PY (95%CI: 7.9-19.8) overall, increasing to 28.7/100 PY; (95%CI 16.3-50.6) among those with recent IDU and needle/syringe sharing. In adjusted analysis, recent IDU with needle/syringe sharing was associated with increased reinfection risk (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 14.62; 95%CI 1.84-116.28; p=0.011) and longer HCV testing interval with decreased risk (i.e., chance of detection; AHR 0.41 per each month increase; 95%CI 0.26-0.64; p<0.001). Conclusion A high rate of HCV reinfection was observed within prison. Post-treatment surveillance and retreatment are essential to limit the impact of reinfection. High-coverage OAT and NSP should be considered within prisons.

No abstract

IntroductionOpioid agonist treatment is effective for opioid dependence and newer extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR) injections represent a significant development. The Community Long-Acting Buprenorphine (CoLAB) study aims to evaluate client outcomes among people with opioid dependence receiving 48 weeks of BUP-XR treatment, and examines the implementation of BUP-XR in diverse community healthcare settings in Australia.Methods and analysisThe CoLAB study is a prospective single-arm, multicentre, open-label trial of monthly BUP-XR injections in people with opioid dependence. Participants are being recruited from a network of general practitioner and specialist drug treatment services located in the states of New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia in Australia. Following a minimum 7 days on 8–32 mg of sublingual buprenorphine (±naloxone), participants will receive monthly subcutaneous BUP-XR injections administered by a healthcare practitioner at intervals of 28 days (−2/+14 days). The primary endpoint is participant retention in treatment at 48 weeks after treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints will evaluate dosing schedule variations, craving, withdrawal, substance use, health and well-being, and client-reported treatment experience. Qualitative and costing substudies will examine implementation barriers and facilitators at the client and provider level.Ethics and disseminationThe study has received ethics approval from the St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref. HREC/18/SVH/221). The findings will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at national and international scientific conferences, and in relevant community organisation publications and forums.Trial registration numberNCT03809143Protocol identifierCoLAB1801, V.4.0 dated 01 August 2019

No abstract

No abstract