2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of a single-arm implementation trial of extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine depot injections in people with opioid dependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the longer the duration of BUP-XR treatment, the better the outcomes 1 year after treatment cessation, with a higher likelihood of sustained opioid abstinence after 12 months of treatment compared to ≤ 2 months of treatment (75.3% vs. 24.1%; p = 0.001) (Ling et al, 2020b). Similarly, improvements in employment, quality of life and treatment satisfaction were observed in a recent 12-month prospective openlabel study of BUP-XR in Australia (Farrell et al, 2022). In that study, the odds of use of all illicit substances except cannabis decreased significantly with time retained in treatment, together with a significant reduction in the odds of moderate-severe depression and a significant decline in pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Also, the longer the duration of BUP-XR treatment, the better the outcomes 1 year after treatment cessation, with a higher likelihood of sustained opioid abstinence after 12 months of treatment compared to ≤ 2 months of treatment (75.3% vs. 24.1%; p = 0.001) (Ling et al, 2020b). Similarly, improvements in employment, quality of life and treatment satisfaction were observed in a recent 12-month prospective openlabel study of BUP-XR in Australia (Farrell et al, 2022). In that study, the odds of use of all illicit substances except cannabis decreased significantly with time retained in treatment, together with a significant reduction in the odds of moderate-severe depression and a significant decline in pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The study received ethical approval from St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/ SVH/221) and was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03809143). In total, 100 people entered the CoLAB study and 75 were retained in BUP-XR treatment until the end of the study period (Farrell et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by an Externally Sponsored Collaborative Research grant from Indivior PLC. Indivior contributed to the study design and analysis plan of the clinical parent study (Farrell et al, 2022) but not this qualitative study; Indivior had no role in collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The Centre for Social Research in Health at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) is supported by a grant from the Australian Government Department of Health.…”
Section: Declaration Of Conflicting Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These improvements were sustained over the study period, suggesting that BUP-XR facilitates long-term engagement of life activities that reflect recovery ( Ling et al., 2020 ). A recent 12-month prospective open-label trial in Australia also showed that retention following BUP-XR treatment at 24 and 48 weeks was 86% and 75%, respectively ( Farrell et al., 2022 ). The odds of use of all illicit substances except for cannabis use decreased significantly with time retained in treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%