O Serviço de Atendimento Móvel de Urgência (SAMU) foi o primeiro componente da Política Nacional de Atenção às Urgências implantado no país no começo dos anos 2000. O artigo analisou o processo de implantação da urgência pré-hospitalar móvel no Brasil. Os métodos incluíram análise documental, entrevistas com coordenadores estaduais de urgência e um painel de especialistas. Utilizou-se o referencial teórico da análise da conduta estratégica da Teoria da Estruturação de Giddens. Os resultados evidenciaram uma implantação do SAMU desigual entre estados e regiões, identificando seis padrões de implantação considerando-se a capacidade dos estados de expandir a cobertura populacional e de regionalizar. As dificuldades estruturais incluíram a fixação de médicos, centrais de regulação mal equipadas e escassez de ambulâncias. Norte e Nordeste foram as regiões mais atingidas. O SAMU está configurado como estratégia estruturante da rede de urgências, mas seu desempenho sofreu o impacto da pouca participação da atenção primária na rede de urgências e principalmente da falta de leitos hospitalares.

OBJECTIVETo analyze the process of implementation of emergency care units in Brazil.METHODSWe have carried out a documentary analysis, with interviews with twenty-four state urgency coordinators and a panel of experts. We have analyzed issues related to policy background and trajectory, players involved in the implementation, expansion process, advances, limits, and implementation difficulties, and state coordination capacity. We have used the theoretical framework of the analysis of the strategic conduct of the Giddens theory of structuration.RESULTSEmergency care units have been implemented after 2007, initially in the Southeast region, and 446 emergency care units were present in all Brazilian regions in 2016. Currently, 620 emergency care units are under construction, which indicates expectation of expansion. Federal funding was a strong driver for the implementation. The states have planned their emergency care units, but the existence of direct negotiation between municipalities and the Union has contributed with the significant number of emergency care units that have been built but that do not work. In relation to the urgency network, there is tension with the hospital because of the lack of beds in the country, which generates hospitalizations in the emergency care unit. The management of emergency care units is predominantly municipal, and most of the emergency care units are located outside the capitals and classified as Size III. The main challenges identified were: under-funding and difficulty in recruiting physicians.CONCLUSIONSThe emergency care unit has the merit of having technological resources and being architecturally differentiated, but it will only succeed within an urgency network. Federal induction has generated contradictory responses, since not all states consider the emergency care unit a priority. The strengthening of the state management has been identified as a challenge for the implementation of the urgency network.

BackgroundThe regulation of emergency care has featured prominently in Brazil’s federal health agenda since the 2000s. The aim of this study was to review up to the present day the implementation of the National Emergency Care Policy.MethodsThe methods employed were documental review, analysis of official data and 11 interviews conducted with federal, state and local managers. The results were analyzed using Giddens’ Structuration Theory, relating the cognitive abilities of the agents to their action strategies, in view of the structural dimensions, rules and resources provided by the federal administration.ResultsFederal policy for emergency care in Brazil can be divided into three stages: from 1998 to 2003, the initial regulation; from 2004 to 2008, the expansion of the Mobile Emergency Medical Services (SAMU, in Brazil); and from 2009 onwards, the implementation of stationary pre-hospital care facilities, known as Emergency Care Units (UPA). The structuration elements identified for the emergency care policy were the public health system guidelines, legislation, standards and federal financing. Significant restrictions were found such as lack of hospital beds and intensive care treatment, gaps in the information system for producing evidence for management, ineffective Management Committees, as well as a low degree of commitment among physicians to the services.ConclusionConsidering the financial constraints imposed on the SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System), emergency care was identified as a political priority with financial support. The individual actions by emergency care workers and governmental agents typified the first period of the policy, structuring the basis and producing changes in the circumstances of action. Federal strategies can be equated to the rules and resources provided to support the implementation process of the policy.

No município do Rio de Janeiro, a implantação das Unidades de Pronto Atendimento 24h (UPA) foi o fio condutor da política de saúde e modelo para estruturação da rede de urgência e emergência (RUE). Este estudo analisou a integração das UPAs na rede assistencial do município. Foram realizadas nove entrevistas, com gestores centrais e locais, analisadas à luz da Teoria da Estruturação de Giddens. Resultados mostraram pouca integração das UPAs, por deficiências estruturais da rede de serviços e fragmentação gerencial, pela ausência de governança unificada. Apesar do investimento político e financeiro, essa estratégia não logrou contornar os problemas de integração entre as unidades de saúde e, ainda, ressaltou a baixa prioridade governamental para a atenção básica. Assim, as UPAs pouco contribuíram para o desenvolvimento de redes de atenção à saúde e para a reorientação do modelo assistencial.