Citrus fruits have potential health-promoting properties and their essential oils have long been used in several applications. Due to biological effects described to some citrus species in this study our objectives were to analyze and compare the phytochemical composition and evaluate the anti-inflammatory effect of essential oils (EO) obtained from four different Citrus species. Mice were treated with EO obtained from C. limon, C. latifolia, C. aurantifolia or C. limonia (10 to 100 mg/kg, p.o.) and their anti-inflammatory effects were evaluated in chemical induced inflammation (formalin-induced licking response) and carrageenan-induced inflammation in the subcutaneous air pouch model. A possible antinociceptive effect was evaluated in the hot plate model. Phytochemical analyses indicated the presence of geranial, limonene, γ-terpinene and others. EOs from C. limon, C. aurantifolia and C. limonia exhibited anti-inflammatory effects by reducing cell migration, cytokine production and protein extravasation induced by carrageenan. These effects were also obtained with similar amounts of pure limonene. It was also observed that C. aurantifolia induced myelotoxicity in mice. Anti-inflammatory effect of C. limon and C. limonia is probably due to their large quantities of limonene, while the myelotoxicity observed with C. aurantifolia is most likely due to the high concentration of citral. Our results indicate that these EOs from C. limon, C. aurantifolia and C. limonia have a significant anti-inflammatory effect; however, care should be taken with C. aurantifolia.
Ethnopharmacological relevance: Mexican people employed infusion of leaves of Choisya ternata Kunth for their antispasmodic and "simulative properties".
Aim of the study:In the present study the detailed GC and GC-MS analyses of the essential oil of Choisya ternata Kunth (Rutaceae) were performed. The presence of a minor constituent isopropyl N-methylanthranilate (1) was revealed among other identified volatiles. A synthesis of 1 was undertaken in order to corroborate this find and obtain gram quantities that would allow the testing of its biological activity (peripheral and central antinociceptive activity).
Material and methods:The oils were investigated by GC and GC-MS. Synthesized compounds were spectrally characterized (UV-Vis, IR, 1D and 2D NMR, MS). The obtained synthetic samples of compounds were assayed for peripheral and central antinociceptive activity in two models (effects on acetic acid induced writhing in mice and the hot plate test for nociception). showed the lowest activity (with the methyl ester at 3 mg/kg still better than acetylsalicylic acid, at 200 mg/kg, in the first, or comparable with morphine, at 5 mg/kg, in the second test).
Conclusion:This study once again revealed that detailed investigations of plant species with ethnopharmacologically documented activity may yield new natural compounds -a new alkaloid (ternanthranin), a volatile simple anthranilate that can be considered responsible for the antinociceptive activity of the crude plant extracts.
Results obtained demonstrated that Couroupita guianensis CEE and its fractions have antinociceptive activity that is mediated, at least in part, by opioid and cholinergic systems and nitric oxide pathway.
The results obtained indicated that EE and DF have antinociceptive activity that is mediated, at least in part, by opioid and cholinergic systems. This effect can be attributed to the presence of apigenin, a flavonoid in the dichloromethane fraction.
The results show that Couroupita guianensis fractions have anti-inflammatory effect, partly due to a reduction on cell migration and a inhibition on cytokines and inflammatory mediators production.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.