Scaffold attachment factor B1 (SAFB1) is an integral component of the nuclear matrix of vertebrate cells. It binds to DNA on scaffold/matrix attachment region elements, as well as to RNA and a multitude of different proteins, affecting basic cellular activities such as transcription, splicing and DNA damage repair. In the present study, we show that enhancer of rudimentary homologue (ERH) is a new molecular partner of SAFB1 and its 70% homologous paralogue, scaffold attachment factor B2 (SAFB2). ERH interacts directly in the nucleus with the C-terminal Arg-Gly-rich region of SAFB1/2 and co-localizes with it in the insoluble nuclear fraction. ERH, a small ubiquitous protein with striking homology among species and a unique structure, has also been implicated in fundamental cellular mechanisms. Our functional analyses suggest that the SAFB/ERH interaction does not affect SAFB1/2 function in transcription (e.g. as oestrogen receptor α co-repressors), although it reverses the inhibition exerted by SAFB1/2 on the splicing kinase SR protein kinase 1 (SRPK1), which also binds on the C-terminus of SAFB1/2. Accordingly, ERH silencing decreases lamin B receptor and SR protein phosphorylation, which are major SRPK1 substrates, further substantiating the role of SAFB1 and SAFB2 in the co-ordination of nuclear function.
Among the polymorphisms investigated, ACE D allele had the strongest association with abnormal myocardial perfusion.
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS), besides being a major regulator of blood pressure, is also involved in tumor angiogenesis. Emerging evidence suggests a correlation between the use of pharmacologic RAS inhibitors and a delay in urothelial bladder cancer (BC) progression. However, it is unknown whether RAS gene variants may predispose to the development of BC. This study examined the association of RAS single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) including AT1R rs5186, AT2R rs11091046, REN rs12750834, ANG rs4762, and ANG rs699 with the risk of developing non-invasive BC. Peripheral blood samples from 73 patients with T1 urothelial BC (66 men, seven women) and an equal number of healthy subjects (control group) were collected. The TT genotype of the REN rs12750834 SNP (OR: 2.8 [1.3–6.05], p = 0.008) and to a lesser extent the presence of the T allele (OR: 2.3 [1.2–4.48], p = 0.01) conferred a higher risk of BC. The highest risk for BC within SNP carriers of the RAS system was associated with the presence of the CC genotype (OR: 17.6 [7.5–41.35], p < 0.001) and C allele (OR: 17.7 [8.8–35.9], p < 0.001) of the ANG rs699 SNP. The presence of the AT2R rs11091046 SNP, particularly the AA genotype, was associated with a protective effect against developing BC (OR: 0.268 [0.126–057], p < 0.001). In conclusion, these results support the clinical utility of RAS gene SNPs AT2R rs11091046, REN rs12750834, and ANG rs699 in the genetic cancer risk assessment of patients and families with BC.
Background: Hypoxia is recognized as a key feature of cancer growth and is involved in various cellular processes, including proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune surveillance. Besides hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α), which is the main mediator of hypoxia effects and can also be activated under normoxic conditions, little is known about its counterpart, HIF-2. This study focused on investigating the clinical and molecular landscape of HIF-2-altered urothelial carcinoma (UC). Methods: Publicly available next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from muscle-invasive UC cell lines and patient tumor samples from the MSK/TCGA 2020 cohort (n = 476) were interrogated for the level of expression (mRNA, protein) and presence of mutations, copy number variations, structural variants in the EPAS1 gene encoding HIF-2, and findings among various clinical (stage, grade, progression-free and overall survival) and molecular (tumor mutational burden, enriched gene expression) parameters were compared between altered and unaltered tumors. Results: 19% (7/37) of UC cell lines and 7% (27/380) of patients with muscle-invasive UC display high EPAS1 mRNA and protein expression or/and EPAS1 alterations. EPAS1-altered tumors are associated with higher stage, grade, and lymph node metastasis as well as with shorter PFS (14 vs. 51 months, q = 0.01) and OS (15 vs. 55 months, q = 0.01). EPAS1 mRNA expression is directly correlated with that of its target-genes, including VEGF, FLT1, KDR, DLL4, CDH5, ANGPT1 (q < 0.001). While there is a slightly higher tumor mutational burden in EPAS1-altered tumors (9.9 vs. 4.9 mut/Mb), they are enriched in and associated with genes promoting immune evasion, including ARID5B, SPINT1, AAK1, CLIC3, SORT1, SASH1, and FGFR3, respectively (q < 0.001). Conclusions: HIF-2-altered UC has an aggressive clinical and a distinct genomic and immunogenomic profile enriched in angiogenesis- and immune evasion-preventing genes.
Introduction: ADAMTS13 (A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease with ThromboSpondin type 1 repeats) activity remains a key tool in differential diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). However, ADAMTS13 testing is not readily available in many hospitals. Recently, PLASMIC and PLASIC scores have been developed to facilitate rapid recognition of TTP. We aimed to evaluate their usefulness compared to ADAMTS13 testing in a real-world cohort of TMA patients. Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients with samples referred to our Center for ADAMTS13 measurement due to TMA over the last 2 years. Samples were collected either at first diagnosis or relapse before initiation of treatment. ADAMTS13 activity was measured with a commercially available and validated ELISA kit (Technozym, Diapharma). Clinical data were retrospectively collected from referring centers. Management was based on treating physicians' decisions. TTP was defined as severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (activity≤10%); while secondary TMAs were diagnosed in patients with cancer, connective tissue disorders or hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients (transplant-associated TMA). Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) remained a diagnosis of exclusion in patients with ADAMTS13>10%. PLASMIC was calculated based on seven variables: platelets, hemolysis, cancer, transplant, MCV, INR, creatinine; while MCV was not included in PLASIC, as previously described. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of scores. Multivariate binary or logistic regression models were performed when appropriate. Results: We studied 50 TMA patients. Combined clinical and laboratory data conferred the following TMA classification: TTP in 36 patients (72%), transplant-associated TMA in 7 (14%), other secondary TMA in 5 and aHUS in 2. PLASMIC score was intermediate in 2 and high in another 4 patients without TTP. The PLASIC score was high in 5 patients without TTP, leading to less false positive results compared to PLASMIC (p<0.001). These patients suffered from secondary TMAs. In the ROC curve analysis, both PLASMIC and PLASIC significantly predicted TTP diagnosis (p<0.001 and area under the curve/AUC 0.891 and 0.892, Figure 1). In patients without secondary TMAs, PLASMIC and PLASIC had an excellent performance (p<0.001 and AUC 1). Plasma exchange was commenced in the majority of patients (42/50, 84%). Among TTP patients, the majority (77%) received rituximab as salvage or prophylactic treatment. Rituximab administration was associated with platelet (p=0.003) and ADAMTS13 (p=0.015) levels at diagnosis. The complement inhibitor eculizumab was administered in 3 patients with TA-TMA, who achieved TMA resolution. With a median follow-up of 2.9 years (range 0.3-26.3), overall survival was significantly lower in patients with secondary TMAs (p<0.001). PLASMIC or PLASIC score were not associated with clinical outcomes in our cohort. Conclusion: PLASMIC and PLASIC scores are excellent tools in TMA patients without secondary causes. While PLASMIC and PLASIC scores conferred similar outcomes, the PLASIC score requires six instead of seven variables, is classified as low/high omitting the intermediate category and leads to less false positive results. Further validation of the PLASIC score might confirm its clinical value. In addition, the role of ADAMTS13 levels in guiding rituximab administration needs to be further investigated. When an underlying etiology is detected, ADAMTS13 testing is necessary to exclude TTP and facilitate further therapeutic decisions. Figure 1 Disclosures Panayiotidis: Bayer: Other: Support of clinical trial.
The [BIC] model bears a very good agreement with the [SIG] model while being simpler and easier to apply at the bedside. [BIC] could be used as an alternative tool for the diagnosis of unmeasured ion acidosis.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA repair genes may predispose to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). This study focused on three specific SNPs in a population with high exposure to environmental carcinogens including tobacco and alcohol. A case-control study design was used to assess for presence of XPC PAT +/−, XRCC3 Thr241Met, and ERCC2 Lys751Gln DNA repair gene SNPs in peripheral blood from patients with UCB and healthy individuals. One hundred patients and equal number of healthy subjects were enrolled. The XPC PAT +/+ genotype was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of UCB (OR = 2.16; 95%CI: 1.14–4; p = 0.01). The −/+ and +/+ XPC PAT genotypes were more frequently present in patients with multiple versus single tumors (p = 0.01). No association was detected between ERCC2 Lys751Gln genotypes/alleles, and risk for developing UCB. Presence of the XRCC3 TT genotype (OR = 0.14; 95%CI:0.07–0.25; p < 0.01) and of the T allele overall (OR = 0.26; 95%CI:0.16–0.41; p < 0.01) conferred a protective effect against developing UCB. The XPC PAT −/+ and XRCC3 Thr241Met SNPs are associated with predisposition to UCB. The XPC PAT −/+ SNP is also an indicator of bladder tumor multiplicity, which might require a more individualized surveillance and treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.