Kidney transplant recipients might be at higher risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). However, risk factors for relevant outcomes remain uncertain in this population. This is a multicentric kidney transplant cohort including 104 hospitalized patients between March 4 and April 17, 2020. Risk factors for death and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were investigated, and clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. The mean age was 60 years. Forty‐seven patients (54.8%) developed ARDS. Obesity was associated to ARDS development (OR 2.63; P = .04). Significant age differences were not found among patients developing and not developing ARDS (61.3 vs 57.8 years, P = .16). Seventy‐six (73%) patients were discharged, and 28 (27%) died. Death was more common among the elderly (55 and 70.8 years, P < .001) and those with preexisting pulmonary disease (OR 2.89, P = .009). At admission, higher baseline lactate dehydrogenase (257 vs 358 IU/mL, P = .001) or ARDS conferred higher risk of death (HR 2.09, P = .044). In our cohort, ARDS was equally present among young and old kidney recipients. However, the elderly might be at higher risk of death, along with those showing higher baseline LDH at admission.

Background Improving cytomegalovirus (CMV) immune-risk stratification in kidney transplantation is highly needed to establish guided preventive strategies. Methods This prospective, interventional, multicenter clinical trial assessed the value of monitoring pretransplant CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) using an interferon-γ release assay to predict CMV infection in kidney transplantation. One hundred sixty donor/recipient CMV-seropositive (D+/R+) patients, stratified by their baseline CMV (immediate-early protein 1)–specific CMI risk, were randomized to receive either preemptive or 3-month antiviral prophylaxis. Also, 15-day posttransplant CMI risk stratification and CMI specific to the 65 kDa phosphoprotein (pp65) CMV antigen were investigated. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in 80% of patients, whereas 20% received thymoglobulin induction therapy. Results Patients at high risk for CMV based on pretransplant CMI developed significantly higher CMV infection rates than those deemed to be at low risk with both preemptive (73.3% vs 44.4%; odds ratio [OR], 3.44 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.30–9.08]) and prophylaxis (33.3% vs 4.1%; OR, 11.75 [95% CI, 2.31–59.71]) approaches. The predictive capacity for CMV-specific CMI was only found in basiliximab-treated patients for both preemptive and prophylaxis therapy. Fifteen-day CMI risk stratification better predicted CMV infection (81.3% vs 9.1%; OR, 43.33 [95% CI, 7.89–237.96]). Conclusions Pretransplant CMV-specific CMI identifies D+/R+ kidney recipients at high risk of developing CMV infection if not receiving T-cell–depleting antibodies. Monitoring CMV-specific CMI soon after transplantation further defines the CMV infection prediction risk. Monitoring CMV-specific CMI may guide decision making regarding the type of CMV preventive strategy in kidney transplantation. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02550639.

The description of protective humoral and T cell immune responses specific against SARS‐CoV‐2 has been reported among immunocompetent (IC) individuals developing COVID‐19 infection. However, its characterization and determinants of poorer outcomes among the at‐risk solid organ transplant (SOT) patient population have not been thoroughly investigated. Cytokine‐producing T cell responses, such as IFN‐γ, IL‐2, IFN‐γ/IL‐2, IL‐6, IL‐21, and IL‐5, against main immunogenic SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens and IgM/IgG serological immunity were tracked in SOT (n = 28) during acute infection and at two consecutive time points over the following 40 days of convalescence and were compared to matched IC (n = 16) patients admitted with similar moderate/severe COVID‐19. We describe the development of a robust serological and functional T cell immune responses against SARS‐CoV‐2 among SOT patients, similar to IC patients during early convalescence. However, at the infection onset, SOT displayed lower IgG seroconversion rates (77% vs. 100%; p = .044), despite no differences on IgG titers, and a trend toward decreased SARS‐CoV‐2‐reactive T cell frequencies, especially against the membrane protein (7 [0–34] vs. 113 [15–245], p = .011, 2 [0–9] vs. 45 [5–74], p = .009, and 0 [0–2] vs. 13 [1–24], p = .020, IFN‐γ, IL‐2, and IFN‐γ/IL‐2 spots, respectively). In summary, our data suggest that despite a certain initial delay, SOT population achieve comparable functional immune responses than the general population after moderate/severe COVID‐19.

BackgroundFrailty is common in older patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD). Since gut microbiota (gMB) may contribute to frailty, we explored possible associations between gMB and frailty in CKD.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a silent and poorly known killer. The current concept of CKD is relatively young and uptake by the public, physicians and health authorities is not widespread. Physicians still mix up CKD with chronic kidney insufficiency or failure, For the wider public and health authorities, CKD evokes kidney replacement therapy (KRT). In Spain, the prevalence of KRT is 0.13%. Thus, health authorities may consider CKD a non-issue: very few persons eventually need KRT and, for those in whom kidneys fail, the problem is “solved” by dialysis or kidney transplantation. However, KRT is the tip of the iceberg in the burden of CKD. The main burden of CKD is accelerated aging and premature death. The cut-off points for kidney function and kidney damage indexes that define CKD also mark an increased risk for all-cause premature death. CKD is the most prevalent risk factor for lethal COVID-19 and the factor that most increases the risk of death in COVID-19, after old age. Men and women undergoing KRT still have an annual mortality which is 10- o 100-fold higher than similar age peers, and life expectancy is shortened by around 40 years for young persons on dialysis and by 15 years for young persons with a functioning kidney graft. CKD is expected to become the fifth global cause of death by 2040 and the second cause of death in Spain before the end of the century, a time when 1 in 4 Spaniards will have CKD. However, by 2022, CKD will become the only top-15 global predicted cause of death that is not supported by a dedicated well-funded CIBER network research structure in Spain. Realizing the underestimation of the CKD burden of disease by health authorities, the Decade of the Kidney initiative for 2020-2030 was launched by the American Association of Kidney Patients (AAKP) and the European Kidney Health Alliance (EKHA). Leading Spanish kidney researchers grouped in the kidney collaborative research network REDINREN have now applied for the RICORS call of collaborative research in Spain with the support of the Spanish Society of Nephrology, ALCER and ONT: RICORS2040 aims to prevent the dire predictions for the global 2040 burden of CKD from becoming true.

Introduction: Tacrolimus is the backbone immunosuppressant after solid organ transplantation. Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window with large intra- and inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability leading to frequent over- and under-immunosuppression. While routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) remains the standard of care, tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability may be influenced by circadian rhythms. Our aim was to analyze tacrolimus pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles on circadian rhythms comparing morning and night doses of a twice-daily tacrolimus formulation.Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis from a clinical trial to study the area under curve (AUC) and the area under effect (AUE) profiles of calcineurin inhibition after tacrolimus administration in twenty-five renal transplant patients. Over a period of 24 h, an intensive sampling (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 15, 20, and 24 h) was carried out. Whole blood and intracellular tacrolimus concentrations and calcineurin activity were measured by UHPLC-MS/MS.Results: Whole blood and intracellular AUC12–24 h and Cmax achieved after tacrolimus night dose was significantly lower than after morning dose administration (AUC0–12 h) (p &lt; 0.001 for both compartments). AUE0–12 h and AUE12–24 h were not statistically different after morning and night doses. Total tacrolimus daily exposure (AUC0–24 h), in whole blood and intracellular compartments, was over-estimated when assessed by doubling the morning AUC0–12 h data.Conclusion: The lower whole blood and intracellular tacrolimus concentrations after night dose might be influenced by a distinct circadian clock. This significantly lower tacrolimus exposure after night dose was not translated into a significant reduction of the pharmacodynamic effect. Our study may provide conceptual bases for better understanding the TDM of twice-daily tacrolimus formulation.

Noninvasive diagnosis of kidney allograft inflammation in transplant recipients with stable graft function (subclinical rejection) could permit more effective therapy and prevent later development of de novo anti-donor HLA antibodies and/or graft dysfunction. Here we tested whether quantifying post-transplant donor-specific alloreactive T cells by IFN-γ ELISPOT assay noninvasively detects subclinical T-cell mediated rejection and/or predicts development of anti-donor HLA antibodies. Using an initial cross-sectional cohort of 60 kidney transplant patients with six-month surveillance biopsies, we found that negative ELISPOT assays accurately ruled out the presence of subclinical T cell mediated rejection. These results were validated using a distinct prospective cohort of 101 patients where donor specific IFN-γ ELISPOT results at both three- and six-months post-transplant significantly differentiated patients with subclinical T cell mediated rejection at six-month, independent of other clinical variables (odds ratio 0.072, 95% confidence interval 0.008-0.653). The post-transplant donor-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT results independently associated with subsequent development of significant anti-donor HLA antibodies (0.085, 0.008-0.862) and with significantly worse two-year function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) compared to patients with a negative test. Thus, post-transplant immune monitoring by donor-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT can assess risk for developing subclinical T cell mediated rejection and anti-donor HLA antibodies, potentially limiting the need for surveillance biopsies. Our study provides a guide for individualizing immunosuppression to improve post-transplant outcomes.

Personalizing immunosuppression is a major objective in transplantation. Transplant recipients are heterogeneous regarding their immunological memory and primary alloimmune susceptibility. This biomarker‐guided trial investigated whether in low immunological‐risk kidney transplants without pretransplant DSA and donor‐specific T cells assessed by a standardized IFN‐γ ELISPOT, low immunosuppression (LI) with tacrolimus monotherapy would be non‐inferior regarding 6‐month BPAR than tacrolimus‐based standard of care (SOC). Due to low recruitment rates, the trial was terminated when 167 patients were enrolled. ELISPOT negatives (E−) were randomized to LI (n = 48) or SOC (n = 53), E+ received the same SOC. Six‐ and 12‐month BPAR rates were higher among LI than SOC/E− (4/35 [13%] vs. 1/43 [2%], p = .15 and 12/48 [25%] vs. 6/53 [11.3%], p = .073, respectively). E+ patients showed similarly high BPAR rates than LI at 6 and 12 months (12/55 [22%] and 13/66 [20%], respectively). These differences were stronger in per‐protocol analyses. Post‐hoc analysis revealed that poor class‐II eplet matching, especially DQ, discriminated E− patients, notably E−/LI, developing BPAR (4/28 [14%] low risk vs. 8/20 [40%] high risk, p = .043). Eplet mismatch also predicted anti‐class‐I (p = .05) and anti‐DQ (p < .001) de novo DSA. Adverse events were similar, but E−/LI developed fewer viral infections, particularly polyoma‐virus‐associated nephropathy (p = .021). Preformed T cell alloreactivity and HLA eplet mismatch assessment may refine current baseline immune‐risk stratification and guide immunosuppression decision‐making in kidney transplantation.