Pollen presentation theory (PPT) allows for a re-examination of some classic themes in pollination biology. Here, we outline its implications in the context of bee-and birdadapted species of Penstemon and Keckiella (Scrophulariaceae). PPT models the optimal schedule of pollen presentation, based on the frequency of visits by pollinators, and the capacities of those pollinators to remove and deposit pollen. High visitation rates, high removal and low deposition all favor plants that present pollen in many small doses. Dosing is achieved through gradual opening of anthers and through anthers opening only narrowly. We hypothesize that bees have higher rates of removal and lower rates of deposition than birds; therefore, bee-pollinated species should have anthers that open more gradually and less completely than bird-pollinated species. Before presenting preliminary results that affirm this prediction, we critically discuss the characterization of species by pollination syndrome. PPT sheds new light on why plants may specialize on particular pollinators. Stebbins' most effective pollinator can be recast as the pollinator that deposits more of the pollen that it removes, thereby making other visitors into conditional parasites. Pollinator shifts might occur when a pollinator with low removal and high deposition becomes abundant; the plants would then be selected to discourage their previous pollinators who are now parasites. Bird-pollination may favor anthers that open quickly and widely, thereby making bees wasteful parasites. Bee-pollination may favor anthers that open slowly and narrowly, thereby making birds ineffective pollinators. In paired comparisons of closely related species, the hummingbird-visited species were redder, had narrower or longer floral tubes, more exserted anthers and stigmas, less pronounced landing platforms, more inclined orientation, produced more nectar of a lower concentration, and had anthers that dehisce faster and more extensively. Extending pollen presentation theory to syndromesThis paper attempts to link classical themes in floral evolution to a new body of theory, using examples from the large genus Penstemon and its segregate genus Keckiella. Adaptation of flowers to pollinators traditionally has been considered in terms of characters such as corolla shape, color, and the placement of sexual organs, but 'pollen presentation theory' (PPT) (Percival 1955) suggests that the scheduling and control of pollen release to visitors should also reflect selection for successful pollination. We first outline the most relevant insights from PPT then review the classical notion of pollination syndromes, to which we add new characters derived from PPT. Turning to organisms, we consider seven pairs of plant species that probably represent independent evolutionary transitions between bee pollination and hummingbird pollination. We gauge the conformity of each P O L L E N P R E S E N TAT I O N A N
During meiosis II in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the cytoplasmic face of the spindle pole body changes from a site of microtubule initiation to a site of de novo membrane formation. These membranes are required to package the haploid meiotic products into spores. This functional change in the spindle pole body involves the expansion and modification of its cytoplasmic face, termed the outer plaque. We report here that SPO21 is required for this modification. The Spo21 protein localizes to the spindle pole in meiotic cells. In the absence of SPO21 the structure of the outer plaque is abnormal, and prospore membranes do not form. Further, decreased dosage of SPO21 leaves only two of the four spindle pole bodies competent to generate membranes. Mutation of CNM67, encoding a known component of the mitotic outer plaque, also results in a meiotic outer plaque defect but does not block membrane formation, suggesting that Spo21p may play a direct role in initiating membrane formation.
SEC9 and SPO20 encode SNARE proteins related to the mammalian SNAP-25 family. Sec9p associates with the SNAREs Sso1/2p and Snc1/2p to promote the fusion of vesicles with the plasma membrane. Spo20p functions with the same two partner SNAREs to mediate the fusion of vesicles with the prospore membrane during sporogenesis. A chimeric molecule, in which the helices of Sec9p that bind to Sso1/ 2p and Snc1/2p are replaced with the homologous regions of Spo20p, will not support vesicle fusion in vegetative cells. The phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate-5-kinase MSS4 was isolated as a high-copy suppressor that permits this chimera to rescue the temperature-sensitive growth of a sec9-4 mutant. Suppression by MSS4 is specific to molecules that contain the Spo20p helical domains. This suppression requires an intact copy of SPO14, encoding phospholipase D. Overexpression of MSS4 leads to a recruitment of the Spo14 protein to the plasma membrane and this may be the basis for MSS4 action. Consistent with this, deletion of KES1, a gene that behaves as a negative regulator of SPO14, also promotes the function of SPO20 in vegetative cells. These results indicate that elevated levels of phosphatidic acid in the membrane may be required specifically for the function of SNARE complexes containing Spo20p.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.