Actitud y habilidades del médico residente de pediatría en la enseñanza de los médicos internos de pregrado, experiencia en hospitales públicos y privados al noroeste de México
El Campus Virtual de Salud Pública es la plataforma educativa de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud, concebida como herramienta para la cooperación técnica. Los objetivos de este artículo son caracterizar la oferta de formación del Campus Virtual de Salud Pública identificando las propuestas de cursos virtuales; caracterizar a los participantes de los cursos; describir los procesos de actualización tecnológica y sus avances en términos de accesibilidad; e identificar su relación con las principales líneas de cooperación de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud. El Campus Virtual de Salud Pública ha desarrollado 210 cursos con tutoría y 226 de autoaprendizaje desde 2007, relacionados con las políticas de la Organización. Se verificó un uso heterogéneo del campus en las distintas temáticas de la cooperación. La cantidad de cursos autoadministrados realizados durante la pandemia superó la cifra total acumulada en años previos. Los participantes provienen principalmente de Latinoamérica. Un 67,5% son mujeres, con edades entre 26 y 45 años. Un 57,1% posee educación universitaria, principalmente en enfermería o medicina. La mitad trabaja en hospitales y un 35,8% en el primer nivel. Más de un 90% de los participantes evaluaron favorablemente los temas abordados, recursos de conocimiento y características del aula virtual. Como dificultades, señalan escasa disponibilidad de tiempo y bajo acceso a internet. Como ventajas, destacan autonomía de horarios y acceso a diversas fuentes de información. Las herramientas de evaluación disponibles no son suficientes para reconocer el impacto de los programas educativos. Se plantean los desafíos de profundizar en la accesibilidad y calidad de las propuestas educativas, fortalecer la relación con los temas de cooperación y mejorar la evaluación de los cursos y el conocimiento sobre los usuarios.
Introduction: The Calgary Family Medicine (FM) Residency Program implemented a competency-based curriculum in 2012 (Triple C). To meet the College of Family Physicians' accreditation standards, the Program also implemented a new assessment program. Field notes (FNs) were introduced to record feedback and to provide data for decisions around Resident competence and progress. Validation of inferences from data collected in field notes is sparse, particularly in relation to how the data can be extrapolated to competence and professional practice. This study investigates the quality and trustworthiness of FNs when their content is used to make decisions about a Resident's competence. Methods: Assessment data from over 3100 FNs, 99 inprogram progress decisions, and scores on the the SOOs and SAMPs components of the College of CFPC Certification Examination in FM were analysed for 16 randomly selected Residents who had successfully completed the Urban FM Residency Program in Calgary under the Triple C Curriculum. Six independent raters (FM community preceptors) were recruited to review copies of the same sets of FNs that were originally used by in-program preceptors to assess Resident progress. 2 independent blinded raters were randomly assigned to each set of FNs. Raters were asked to use FN data to decide on Resident progress, and indicate their level of confidence in their decisions. This was compared with Peer Review under the responsibility of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. the actual in-program progress decision previously made for each Resident. Quality of FNs was assessed using a Formative Feedback Evaluation Tool (FFET), and were scored 1-5. Results: The quality of the FN data was found to be suboptimal (mean 2.27). The consistency of raters' progress decisions was high (89%). Correlation analyses indicated a significant weak positive relationship between quality of FNs and raters' confidence, r(196) = .201, p = .005; a significant moderate positive linear relationship between number of FNs and raters' confidence, r(196) = .30, p < .001; and a significant moderate positive linear relationship between total number of FNs received by a resident and the residents z-scores in the SAMPS component of the CFPC exam, r(14) = .55, p = .026 Conclusion: The results provide evidence supporting the validity of assessment decisions based on Field Note data. The quality and number as well as the quality of the FNs appears important in supporting the trustworthiness of summative progress decisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.