Background Asthma in the elderly seems to be more severe compared to asthma in younger

PurposeOur study tried to find a relationship between baseline FEF25-75% and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and whether a greater FEF25-75% impairment may be a marker of a more severe hyperresponsiveness in subjects with normal FEV1 and FEV1/FVC and suggestive asthma symptoms. Besides, we tried to asses a FEF25-75% cut-off value to identify hyper-reactive subjects.Methods4,172 subjects (2,042 M; mean age: 38.3±14.9; mean FEV1 % predicted: 100.5±12.7 and FEV1/FVC: 85.4±6.8) were examined after performing a methacholine (Mch) test. All subjects reported a symptom onset within 3 years before the test. Subjects with PD20<400 or >400 µg were arbitrarily considered affected by moderate/severe and borderline AHR, respectively.ResultsPD20 values were 213 (IQR:86-557), 340 (IQR:157-872) and 433 (IQR:196-1032) µg in subjects with baseline FEF25-75≤50%, FEF25-75 between 50 and 70% and FEF25-75>70% respectively (P<0.0001). Only in moderate/severe hyper-reactive subjects (excluded borderlines), PD20 was lower in the FEF25-75≤50% subgroup than in the 1 with FEF25-75>70%. The hyperreactive subjects percentage, was higher in those with FEF25-75≤50% and lower in those with FEF25-75>70% (P<0.0001). FEF25-75<50% (compared to FEF25-75>70%) was a higher AHR risk factor, especially in subjects with moderate/severe AHR (OR: 2.18 [IQR:1.41-3.37]; P<0.0001). Thresholds yielding the highest combined sensitivity/specificity for FEF25-75% were 75.19 (area under curve [AUC]: 0.653) and 74.95 (AUC:0.688) in subjects with PD20<2,400 and <400 µg respectively. FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC measured in subjects with different FEF25-75≤50%, FEF25-75>50 and ≤70% or FEF25-75>70% levels were similar both in normoreactive and hyperreactive subjects.ConclusionsAt asthma onset, reduced baseline FEF25-75 values with normal FEV1 and FEV1/FVC may predict AHR. Detectable predictive cut-off values do not exist because even normoreactive subjects can show lower FEF25-75 values. Furthermore, a greater FEF25-75 reduction may be associated to a more severe AHR, suggesting a possible FEF25-75 role in the management of asthma when FEV1 and FEV1/FVC are normal.

Mesalazine therapy for ulcerative colitis has been reported to be effective and safe. Rare cases of mesalazine-induced renal, pancreatic, myo-pericardial, pleuro-pulmonary and haematological toxicity have been described separately. We report a case characterized by the simultaneous presence of fever, pericarditis, peripheral eosinophilia, eosinophilic pneumonia, anaemia and haematuria (together with proteinuria and leukocyturia) due to mesalazine treatment in a patient with ulcerative colitis. No clinical response had been obtained with corticosteroids and various antibacterial agents. When mesalazine treatment was suspended, all symptoms rapidly and totally disappeared, confirming the direct responsibility of this drug in causing these adverse events. We conclude that mesalazine can induce multi-organ hypersensitivity, which must always be considered as a possible adverse effect during treatment with this drug. To resolve this adverse event it is essential to discontinue mesalazine treatment.

BackgroundLiterature is still arguing about a possible relationship between airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and body mass index (BMI). This study aimed at evaluating the influence of BMI on AHR and pulmonary function in children and adolescents that performed a methacholine test for suggestive asthma symptoms.Methods799 consecutive children/adolescents (535 M; mean age: 15 ± 3 yrs; median FEV1% predicted: 101.94% [93.46-111.95] and FEV1/FVC predicted: 91.07 [86.17-95.38]), were considered and divided into underweight, normal, overweight and obese. Different AHR levels were considered as moderate/severe (PD20 ≤ 400 μg) and borderline (PD20 > 400 μg).Results536 children/adolescents resulted hyperreactive with a median PD20 of 366 μg [IQR:168–1010.5]; 317 patients were affected by moderate/severe AHR, whereas 219 showed borderline hyperresponsiveness. Obese subjects aged > 13 years showed a lower (p = 0.026) median PD20 (187μg [IQR:110–519]) compared to overweight (377 μg [IQR:204–774]) and normal-weight individuals’ values (370.5 μg [IQR:189–877]). On the contrary, median PD20 observed in obese children aged ≤ 13 years (761 μg [IQR:731–1212]) was higher (p = 0.052) compared to normal-weight children’s PD20 (193 μg [IQR:81–542]) and to obese adolescents’ values (aged > 13 years) (p = 0.019). Obesity was a significant AHR risk factor (OR:2.853[1.037-7.855]; p = 0.042) in moderate/severe AHR adolescents. Females showed a higher AHR risk (OR:1.696[1.046-2.751] p = 0.032) compared to males. A significant relationship was found between BMI and functional parameters (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC) only in hyperreactive females.ConclusionsObesity seems to influence AHR negatively in female but not in male adolescents and children. In fact, AHR is higher in obese teenagers, in particular in those with moderate/severe hyperresponsiveness, and may be mediated by obesity-associated changes in baseline lung function.

BackgroundEpidemiological data indicate that obesity is a risk factor for asthma, but scientific literature is still debating the association between changes in body mass index (BMI) and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR).MethodsThis study aimed at evaluating the influence of BMI on AHR, in outpatients with symptoms suggestive of asthma.4,217 consecutive adult subjects (2,439 M; mean age: 38.2±14.9 yrs; median FEV1 % predicted: 100 [IQR:91.88-107.97] and FEV1/FVC % predicted: 85.77% [IQR:81.1-90.05]), performed a methacholine challenge test for suspected asthma. Subjects with PD20 < 200 or 200 < PD20 < 800 or PD20 > 800 were considered affected by severe, moderate or mild AHR, respectively.ResultsA total of 2,520 subjects (60% of all cases) had a PD20 < 3,200 μg, with a median PD20 of 366 μg [IQR:168–1010.5]; 759, 997 and 764 patients were affected by mild, moderate and severe AHR, respectively. BMI was not associated with increasing AHR in males. On the contrary, obese females were at risk for AHR only when those with moderate AHR were considered (OR: 1.772 [1.250-2.512], p = 0.001). A significant reduction of FEV1/FVC for unit of BMI increase was found in moderate AHR, both in males (β = −0.255; p =0.023) and in females (β = −0.451; p =0.017).ConclusionsOur findings indicate that obesity influences AHR only in females with a moderate AHR level. This influence may be mediated by obesity-associated changes in baseline lung function.

Background: Epidemiological data indicate that obesity is a risk factor for asthma, but scientific literature is still debating the association between changes in body mass index (BMI) and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Methods: This study aimed at evaluating the influence of BMI on AHR, in outpatients with symptoms suggestive of asthma. 4,217 consecutive adult subjects (2,439 M; mean age: 38.2±14.9 yrs; median FEV1 % predicted: 100 [IQR:91.88-107.97] and FEV1/FVC % predicted: 85.77% [IQR:81.1-90.05]), performed a methacholine challenge test for suspected asthma. Subjects with PD20 < 200 or 200 < PD20 < 800 or PD20 > 800 were considered affected by severe, moderate or mild AHR, respectively. Results: A total of 2,520 subjects (60% of all cases) had a PD20 < 3,200 μg, with a median PD20 of 366 μg [IQR:168–1010.5]; 759, 997 and 764 patients were affected by mild, moderate and severe AHR, respectively. BMI was not associated with increasing AHR in males. On the contrary, obese females were at risk for AHR only when those with moderate AHR were considered (OR: 1.772 [1.250-2.512], p = 0.001). A significant reduction of FEV1/FVC for unit of BMI increase was found in moderate AHR, both in males (β = −0.255; p =0.023) and in females (β = −0.451; p =0.017). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that obesity influences AHR only in females with a moderate AHR level. This influence may be mediated by obesity-associated changes in baseline lung function.

Objective: This study analysed whether the persistence of both reversible airway obstruction (RAO) and elevated BE counts was associated to reduced asthma control and accelerated lung function decline in treated severe asthmatics. Methods: About 202 severe asthmatics were studied after 12-120 months of step-5 treatment associated to anti-IgE therapy. Following treatments, reversibility tests, after inhaling 400 mcg of Salbutamol, were performed. FEV 1 > 12% or ≤12% changes differentiated RAO+ from RAO− subjects. Blood eosinophil (BE) counts after treatment were considered. Results: Pre-/post-treatment bronchodilator FEV 1 % and ACT were lower (61% [50-71], 74.4% [62.5-83.7] and 20[18-22]), whereas BE were higher (380 cells/µl [170-590]) in RAO+ compared to RAO− subjects (77% [64-88], p = 0.0001, 81.8% [66.1-94.3], p = 0.0001, 21[18-23], p = 0.045 and 230 cells/µl [80-360], p = 0.003). A negative relationship between SABA-induced FEV 1 % changes and pre-bronchodilator FEV 1 % (β = −0.551%; p = 0.0001) and ACT (β = −0.059; p = 0.038) was found. Conversely, post-treatment BE levels were positively related (β = 145.565 cells/µl; p = 0.003) to FEV 1 > 12% increases. A rising trend of pre-/post-bronchodilator FEV 1 % in time was observed in RAO− subjects with BE < 300 cells/µl. Conversely, we highlighted significant declining tendencies of pre/post-bronchodilator FEV 1 % in RAO+ patients with BE > 300 cells/µl reaching lower values after more than 36 months of step-5 treatment (59.6% [39.9-72.1] vs 74[66.5-89.2] of RAO+ individuals with BE < 300 cells/µl [p = 0.026] and 81.6% [66.1-91.8] of RAO-subjects with BE > 300 cells/µl [p = 0.009]). Conclusion: Persistent SABA-induced FEV 1 > 12%, especially when associated to BE > 300 cells/ml, may be a marker of accelerated lung function decline in severe asthmatics despite maximal step-5 treatment. The highest bronchodilation associated to the lowest BE levels should be the main goal of asthma treatment to prevent such decline.

Mesalazine therapy for ulcerative colitis has been reported to be effective and safe. Rare cases of mesalazine-induced renal, pancreatic, myo-pericardial, pleuro-pulmonary and haematological toxicity have been described separately. We report a case characterized by the simultaneous presence of fever, pericarditis, peripheral eosinophilia, eosinophilic pneumonia, anaemia and haematuria (together with proteinuria and leukocyturia) due to mesalazine treatment in a patient with ulcerative colitis. No clinical response had been obtained with corticosteroids and various antibacterial agents. When mesalazine treatment was suspended, all symptoms rapidly and totally disappeared, confirming the direct responsibility of this drug in causing these adverse events. We conclude that mesalazine can induce multi-organ hypersensitivity, which must always be considered as a possible adverse effect during treatment with this drug. To resolve this adverse event it is essential to discontinue mesalazine treatment.