2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of omalizumab in severe asthmatics across ages: A real life Italian experience

Abstract: Background Asthma in the elderly seems to be more severe compared to asthma in younger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
3
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
16
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our prior review provided strong evidence for the short-term (16 weeks to 1 year) effectiveness of omalizumab, and emergent yet still tentative evidence that the effectiveness may extend up to 2 to 4 years. This present review firmly establishes the short-term effectiveness of omalizumab at 16 weeks and 1 year, and provides strong evidence of its long-term effectiveness: seven studies reported outcomes at 2 years [37,39,43,45,60,70,76], seven studies at 3 years or more [36,47,58,63,64,66,70,73], one study at 4 years [36], and one study with a mean follow-up of 60.7 months followed patients for as long as 121 months [66]. Thus, our review provides strong evidence on the major outcomes of interest for up to 2 to 4 years; and emergent evidence reaching well beyond 4 years.…”
Section: Expert Commentarysupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our prior review provided strong evidence for the short-term (16 weeks to 1 year) effectiveness of omalizumab, and emergent yet still tentative evidence that the effectiveness may extend up to 2 to 4 years. This present review firmly establishes the short-term effectiveness of omalizumab at 16 weeks and 1 year, and provides strong evidence of its long-term effectiveness: seven studies reported outcomes at 2 years [37,39,43,45,60,70,76], seven studies at 3 years or more [36,47,58,63,64,66,70,73], one study at 4 years [36], and one study with a mean follow-up of 60.7 months followed patients for as long as 121 months [66]. Thus, our review provides strong evidence on the major outcomes of interest for up to 2 to 4 years; and emergent evidence reaching well beyond 4 years.…”
Section: Expert Commentarysupporting
confidence: 65%
“…To minimize bias, non-significant results reported in the original publication were included in our pooled estimates. Table 1 summarizes the 42 studies stratified by 30 adult-only studies [24,26,27,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] (n = 3558) and 12 adult/ adolescent studies [25,38,39,56,57,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] (n = 5819). These 42 studies comprised a total of 9377 patients from 35 countries: 25 in Europe (incl.…”
Section: Other Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, montelukast among elderly patients with severe asthma was shown to be moderately efficacious in improving asthma control days and reducing rescue medication use . Some older patients with asthma have demonstrated clinical improvement after treatment with anti‐IgE (omalizumab) therapy, although the response may be less than in younger patients …”
Section: Pharmacologic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 132 Omalizumab improves all asthma outcomes independently of age, although the magnitude of the effects observed in the elderly seems to be lower than in other age groups. 133 Post hoc analyses of the anti-IgE agent omalizumab indicate similar efficacy in both younger and older adults. Anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-13 therapy appear to show even more pronounced effects as targeted treatments in late-onset disease and in asthmatic patients 65 years or older, but evidence is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%