Nutricia Bagó provided the place to carry out meetings and helped to develop the charts. Nutricia Bagó did not have any participation in the writing of this article and did not interfere with the editorial management. None of the authors has a business relationship with Nutricia Bagó, except for their participation in conferences organized by the company and other events organized by other companies.

AimThe enumeration of intraepithelial lymphocytes subsets (total, γδ, and CD3– IELs) by flow cytometry (FCM), named as IEL lymphogram, constitutes a useful tool for celiac disease (CD) diagnosis. The aim of this study was to quantify IELs by FCM and their diagnostic value to differentiate active, silent and potential CD.MethodsProspective study of 60 active and 20 silent CD patients, and 161 controls in which duodenal biopsy and IEL quantification by FCM was performed.ResultsActive and silent CD patients had significant higher levels of both total and γδ IELs than absent CD patients (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, P = 0.012 and P < 0.011; respectively). Active and silent CD patients had significant lower levels of CD3– IELs than absent CD patients (P < 0.047 and P < 0.009, respectively). Moreover, they were lower in silent than in active CD patients (P = 0.002). Changes of IELs subsets were more marked in children than adults active CD. The optimal IEL lymphogram cut off values for active CD diagnosis were: ≥10, ≥15 and ≤9 %, and with better performance characteristics for silent CD: ≥ 11, ≥10 and ≤5 %.ConclusionThe evaluation of IELs subsets by FCM is useful to confirm diagnosis of active and silent CD.

Prevalencia de enfermedad celíaca: estudio multicéntrico en población pediátrica de cinco distritos urbanos de la ArgentinaPrevalence of celiac disease: multicentric trial among pediatric population from five urban districts in Argentina RESUMEN Introducción. Hasta la fecha del estudio no se hallaron estudios poblacionales publicados sobre prevalencia de enfermedad celíaca en la población pediátrica argentina. Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de la enfermedad celíaca en población pediátrica a partir de una muestra de base hospitalaria de cinco distritos urbanos. Método. Diseño descriptivo de corte transversal. Bajo consentimiento informado, participaron 2219 niños, de 3 a 16 años, que realizaban estudios de laboratorio para exámenes prequirúrgi-cos o certificados de aptitud física deportiva del Conurbano bonaerense, y ciudades de Buenos Aires, Santa Fe, Córdoba y Salta. Se incluyeron niños con diagnóstico previo y certero de enfermedad celíaca dentro de esa población. Se determinaron anticuerpos antitransglutaminasa y, en las muestras positivas, anticuerpo antiendomisio. Se propuso biopsia de intestino delgado a quienes presentaron ambas serologías positivas. Resultados: 29 serologías fueron positivas. Se realizaron 22 biopsias de duodeno, 21 fueron compatibles con enfermedad celíaca y 7 presentaron diagnóstico previo. La prevalencia fue de 1,26% (1:79) IC 95% 0,84-1,81, con predominio del sexo femenino (p <0,039). El 90% de los niños celíacos hallados fueron mayores de 6 años. Las formas clínicas silentes predominaron, pero hubo un 33% de casos sintomáticos. Conclusión. Los resultados en la población estudiada muestran una prevalencia mayor que la esperada. El hallazgo de formas sintomáticas (33%) sugiere emprender acciones de difusión del conocimiento de la enfermedad y ampliar la indicación de serología para obtener diagnóstico precoz. Palabras clave: enfermedad celíaca, prevalencia, Argentina, antitransglutaminasa tisular.

No abstract

Objective. To compare the performance of IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA anti-tTG), IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (IgA EMA), and IgA/IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides (IgA/IgG anti-DGP) for the diagnosis of celiac disease. Methods. Descriptive study in patients with celiac disease. Anti-DGP (IgA/IgG), IgA EMA, IgA anti-tTG antibodies were measured and an intestinal biopsy was done. Sex: female (61 %). Median age: 78.4 months old. Results. A total of 136 children were included; 108 had high IgA anti-DGP titers; 124, increased IgG anti-DGP titers; 128, positive IgA EMA titers; and 130, increased IgA anti-tTG titers. High IgG anti-DGP titers were observed in 4/6 patients with negative IgA anti-tTG antibodies. The combination of IgG anti-DGP + IgA anti-tTG antibodies showed a positive correlation in 134 patients and the IgG anti-DGP + EMA combination was positive in 133 children. Conclusion. IgA EMA, IgA anti-tTG, and IgG anti-DGP antibodies exhibited an adequate specificity and sensitivity. The IgG anti-DGP/anti-tTG combination showed a 98-99 % sensitivity and a 100 % specificity. The anti-tTG and IgG anti-DGP option yields excellent results, with a low cost and independence from the observer.